James_

Nevermind

+Support for Chrotix he obviously prop minged. but -support for quaked he did nothing wrong

+Support for Chrotix he obviously prop minged. but -support for quaked he did nothing wrong

You should have noticed the situation when you teleported there immediately. You still administrated a sit of not only your family member, but one that you were preivously engaged in (obviously you died during it, and you were there because it might thave been the max time you can raid-- showing that it had still been an active situation since you left.) Thats all im going to say to maybe clear the confusion Sourg might have had.

well put

While all previously applicants are qualified, I believe Phil deserves the position a little more.

+Support This is very dustructive to the trust between staff and normal players. Not only did they get on staff to handle a situation they were previously involved in, they took their family members sit. Staff members should not be getting involved in general with their family members when it comes to administrating, let alone involve themself (directly) in a situation they were involved in. It allows for very evident and as seen in this video bias. Staff member should be punished accordingly. Nothing personal Sourg, I am Bappo as well, but this isn't acceptable. "5). Do not deal with sits involving yourself or your friends to avoid potential bias issue. In these instances you are required to have an uninvolved staff member take the sit, or file a player report." and for the other violation I saw, I couldn't find where it says specifically not to adminstrate a sit that is in regard to the situation you were previously engaged in. But it has been made clear that is a rule even if not specifically stated. Will change opinion depending on @Sourg response

I dont see any grounds for a warn for harassment, and this is a clear issue. While Freeze might have broke a rule, it was nothing compared to harassment. It is just player diss. In order for this to be the acclaimed "sexual harassment," you have to look at it for its actual meaning, not bending the rules to issue a harsher punishment. The denotative meaning when you tell someone to "suck your dick" is of course sexual harassment, though it is clear that the denotative meaning doesn't apply to this situation -- its a commonly used insult to tell someone to "suck your dick," and definitely not taken literally in a gaming environment. Especially a player of Freeze's stature I don't think he meant it in that regard. Its clearly not harassment, at most player diss.

Pretty disgusting bind to have. -Support

Seems very unprofessional of a staff member, hopefully SMT will look into this.