Levii

3/10 Really cool idea, Nice to see a test log where the hypothesis was wrong Lack of a description of events. Incomplete sentences. Overall general lack of effort put into it. Remember just because this one has a low grade doesn't mean you can't improve. If you'd like you can reach out to myself or any SR or LR to help you improve your test logs.

9/10 Great Log, well written 0 grammatical or spelling errors Not sure if 155 could burn itself up but it would definitely be capable of the connections being destroyed due to overheating, not sure if the whole thing could just melt

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HCPyNQuRSI_Io1X69Xx_a0RnNq2yuz9ToZSNJ8dOIz8/edit?usp=sharing

8/10 Really good and really well written For mass test logs you just write about your test not the tests of others The part of you talking about your test was a little short, would've loved to see more about it.

I need to say this because of all the people saying about the breaches. Command have received reports with no evidence as well as one time an admin cleared him. So I will ask that you do not take the "reports" into account.

-Support Very childish behavior, lack of activity, hasn't had a test log since december 4th, overall generally unfit to be command and I cannot give support at this time.

+Support You did kinda go inactive after the last time you applied so kinda worried it will happen again but I trust you. Good guy, been in research a while and knows what he's doing. Can be immature at times but knows when to knock it off and do what he has to.

+support this guy is fucking insane in his progression and his test logs. Does an absolutely amazing job and makes very detailed logs. In addition is a very mature person and very good fit for command

10/10 Cant find any flaws, great grammar, great in depth writing and lots of creativity involved in the test. amazing test.

8.5/10 Great log Great spelling/grammar Really short wish there was more but that's fine

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f0reIqVldgRmBm_Vfh8pQYG-A6K_pMBWXfR_VBR68Sc/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RoTMzoPHEbmdpP_cHSBtMOmQ1OJ1HV_qsbjruQpNYiA/edit?usp=sharing

Your in game name: RS Levii Wood (during incident Mela I) Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:149324474 The player's in game name: Usually Hockey, this case Mr. Mask Man The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:1:572040588 Date and Time This Incident Occurred: 10:25 AM 12/10/21 What did the player do: In the video it shows him killing a D class inside of armory and killing another SCP, medal was not recording my audio but I stated multiple times to him that he cannot kill inside of armory and that I was an SCP. Despite that he still killed me. Evidence (required): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/74935265/d1337I9Jtg3k?invite=cr-MSx4clcsMTk3NTU1NzEs What do you believe should happen to the player: He deliberately broke two rules while being told about those rules so I would think like a 12 hour or day long ban is sufficient but it's up to whoever handles this. Any extra information: BigMarsh was the D class killed in the scenario.

8.5/10 - Really good test log - Interesting inputs and results - Very good formating - Recurring spelling errors being "contenting" rather than "containing"

Also forgot to mention in my last comment forgot to put in your warns.

Try now I think I fixed it

+support good man

Pros - Decent kid Cons - lazy application - Lazy Test logs - Very childish at times and won't let people get a word in if he goes on a tangent Overall - Support HOWEVER for those of you who are claiming he breached SCPs yes research command has recieved reports with absolutely no evidence. I do not know about the 173 breach incident however the day where he was accused of breaching multiple SCPs such as 682 and 610 someone else admitted to it and got removed from research. I would greatly appreciate if you do not keep spreading these rumors. However criticizing his lack of effort is quite fair. If yall wish to keep the 173 breach incident that's fine but please do not say he breached multiple unless you have evidence to the contrary.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xwxo_7I5UjdT4FldS2JofmX7AcVOgQvXfpGu0X5a4KM/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13u4VZhw33V0zAYwxUKKlCAzvweHBtJTDjDG5X8fZW9w/edit?usp=sharing

+support

+support

7.5/10 Pros good writing nice detail decent formatting Cons I don't think vodka would cause that kind of reaction in a humanoid entity minor grammatical errors would like to see words spelled out instead of symbols in their place like "+" Overall decent log, could be improved upon.

+support, really good guy, knows what he's doing, little short app but I had a short app too and still got accepted and he will do good work and be active.

+support would be a great addition to analysts