Jump to content

Breen

Member
  • Posts

    424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Breen

  1. INVALID

    Test is a direct breach of the SOP. You will be receiving a strike, and due to the 1 strike policy for JRs, removed from the branch. You may be retrained after 24 hours of the removal.

     

    honestly what did you expect would happen to 049-2 if you gave it horse tranquilizer?

  2. -support

    -not very mature when you get going or encounter conflict

    -i haven't really seen you do much recently since you got FD

    -can sometimes put yourself over others because of your rank

    -your wording makes it seem like you want the rank simply because it is an elite rank

     

  3. -support

    you obviously knew what you were doing when you said the n word FOUR separate times. In one clip you are trying to say you said something else. Your application is basically you just saying you miss playing on the server, not a good way to appeal a ban. plus you were already punished for this THREE separate times, and you did not learn from ANY of them. If it takes a perma ban to get you to realize what you did was wrong then your ban is well deserved.

    image.png.67acb0083d4c24aa7d2a72d9eabb8480.png

    You also lied about it when you were confronted. So you knew exactly what you were doing.

     


    image.png.f39af05a9a4aecb7ec74f9b733e1015f.png

     

  4. Overall Grade: Quality

    Lore: Your test followed lore well, not many people remember that SCP-939 produces AMN-C227. 

    Creativity: As stated above not many people know that SCP-939 produces AMN-C227, so testing a way to mass produce it is very creative. Your procedure was also creative, it wasn't just walking up to 939 and "/me takes lungs."

    Presentation: Test log is very well made, it is formatted very nicely and is easy to follow. I enjoy the captioned pictures you added at the end.

    Writing: Well written, no spelling or grammar errors, sentences are descriptive and vivid.
     

  5. Interesting test. Follows lore but strays off in a creative way. However it is quite short and the analysis/conclusion isn't connected to the observation very well. Also the colors seem unnecessary and are harsh on the eyes.

    Standard

  6. -Support

    -Messy application

    -A little immature

    -Not very good answers to last two questions

    -Haven't seen you much

    -IIRC fairly new to higher ranking researcher ranks

     

    (also you know you cant even touch the SOP until HCMD right)

×
×
  • Create New...