Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Rookieblue

Retired Staff
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,231

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Rookieblue

    Security Roll Call 6/11/23 -> 6/18/23

    in Archive

    Posted

    Name: Rookieblue

    Rank: Corporal

    Steam ID (Example: STEAM_0:1:174348602): STEAM_0:1:42428330

    Discord ID (Example: Gucci Bucket Hat#9588 OR "ceyx." if discord updated your username to the new format): Rookieblue#2667

    Current Sub-Branches you're in: None

    Why should you retain your rank (Command ONLY | 100+ words): N/A

    Any Notes, Questions, or Concerns?: N/A

    Warning Appeal STONKSMAN

    in Denied

    Posted

    - Support

    This is blatantly looking for loopholes and common sense.

    Additionally, I point out this paragraph:

    "Upon successfully connecting to Foundation systems SCP 079 is able to interact with various Foundation systems throughout the Foundation."

    The doors are systems in the Foundation, meaning they can't be accessed until 079 connects.

    • Like 2

    General Suggestion - MOTD rule change/clarification on 912 - Denied

    in Denied

    Posted

    - Support

    In lore, SCP 912 attacks anyone not wearing a specific police department's uniform, meaning that if it ran into a regular guard at the Foundation, it would attack that guard. For the purposes of the server, we've obviously changed the rule to allow SCP 912 to both listen to, and respect GENSEC and MTF authority. Changing the rule would further allow SCP 912 to be a sole benefit to Foundation forces, however it would reduce SCP 912's RP ability. This rule was intentionally written to force those players with weapons around SCP 912 to be careful, as those not specifically in GENSEC or MTF would be vulnerable to 912 attempting to arrest them.

    • Like 2
    • Dislike 1
    • Gaminglight Love 3

    Bucks Staff /ET restriction appeal

    in Denied

    Posted

    Prior to this incident Buck described, he was subject to this staff report: https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/74500-buck-staff-report/

     

    During my investigation into this staff report, I discovered numerous incident where Buck engaged in abuse of his staff powers by using powers off duty, moving people with his physgun while off duty without the consent of the players, and generally causing problems. Buck was issued two staff strikes during this incident, and I verbally warned Buck personally that any further abuse of his staff powers would result in being removed from the staff team.

    On May 18th I received a report from the then ET Leader that Buck had engaged in serious misconduct on the Event Team, that being spawning a Micro Cannon, which is prohibited at ALL TIMES, and used his ET powers inappropriately. After this report was substantiated, pursuant to the conversation and expectations that I laid out for Buck he was removed from the staff and ET team and issued a staff restriction.

    Buck previous appealed his restriction here: https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/77572-buckapollo-staff-restriction-appeal/

    While I agree with Buck that he hasn't caused any issues since his staff restriction, I do not believe overturning the staff restriction is called for. Buck had multiple chances, the consequences of further misconduct were made abundantly clear, and he made the decision to abuse his powers again.

     

    Biggie Cheese Warn appeal

    in Accepted

    Posted

    Accepted

    After reviewing this appeal, I've elected to accept the appeal. While the player in question questioned whether an invisible player was at the location, this could've easily been solved by the admin going, "No, it's staff". Even if there was an invisible player present, the appealing player never used the knowledge for RP advantage. As such, this warning is void and has been removed from your record.

    Staff Report - Weiss

    in Archive

    Posted

    Staff Report Dispostion

    After reviewing the staff report in question, this report is being denied, and no action will be taken against the staff member in question. The reporting player is accusing Super Admin Weiss of being unprofessional in a sit and going on a "power trip". After reviewing the video of the incident, as well as the reporting player's statements, there is no evidence that Weiss engaged in any behavior that is considered disrespectful.

    Administrators of all ranks, from Trial Moderators to the Server Managers are encouraged to use their discretion when issuing warnings to players. This is because many factors can go into deciding whether a player is issued a warnings. These factors can include the type of alleged offense, the previous history of the player, the player's attitude in the sit, and other factors. I have been involved in countless sits in which my plan is to issue someone a verbal warning for an incident and they then earn a formal warning, and it appears this was the case in this incident. I see no evidence showing that Weiss engaged in misconduct, nor evidence that the warning itself is invalid. 

    22 hours ago, Pope Mobile Door Gunner said:

    This has gone exactly as I expected it would. I ask people to question the actions of their superior and they entirely side with their superior because siding against a superior would literally ruin the career of anyone who wishes to attain the same rank. 

    I would like to address this specific comment, because it shows that you don't actually understand the process behind the scenes, nor some of our most recent incidents involving several high ranking staff members that were called out for unprofessional behavior by other staff members and members of this community and resulted in them being removed from their positions or demoted. I highly encourage people to call out staff members that aren't living up to the standards that I, the other SCP SMT, and the overall GL Community set, and no one is above those standards. The simple fact of the matter is that this incident is not one of staff misconduct.

    • Gaminglight Love 4
    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    MazuzaM - TrialMod Report

    in Archive

    Posted

    Staff Report Disposition

    After reviewing the evidence and testimony provided in this report, I've come to a final decision. The reporting player in this report accused Trial Moderator MazuzaM of targeting him and being unprofessional. The reporting player failed to provide any evidence of his claims, and therefore this report is unfounded, and this report will not be held in consideration of MazuzaM's further career as a staff member.

    Additionally, during this report video evidence was provided that shows the reporting player indeed engage in the behavior Trial Moderator MazuzaM brought the reporting player into a sit for. The reporting player has therefore been issued a formal warning for FailRP - Breaching Offline SCPs.

    • Like 7
×
×
  • Create New...