Fishy Posted September 7, 2021 Share Posted September 7, 2021 Not sure if I'm going to continue these series of documents, I'm having fun making them but not sure if they're giving us much info. Critique appreciated.https://docs.google.com/document/d/12wbwek89Z0PBRyS_iywL_l33ptQcenhPHgmlDlWgJOY/edit?usp=sharing (Subject of interrogation is from the first part. I'd recommend reading the info on the object before reading this) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YziZ38TPghvUkxTQWUsNVjnBabVT4wE4MUakW_vr4AY/edit?usp=sharing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geeko Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 Overall a good log with a few issues. On the first log I felt you could've gone a bit more in depth on the conversation as the log ended right as it was getting good. Something else I was confused on is that in the conclusion of the second log you said that 1048 was able to determine which object was "better" but never specified in which way. For example, did you mean stronger, smarter, or more powerful? With that being said: Writing: 17% Insight: 22% Presentation: 14% Efficiency: 23% Exceeds Expectations: 76% R&D Chief Inspector and Poop Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts