Jump to content

Curtis

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Curtis

  1. On 6/16/2020 at 2:04 AM, Your Local Soviet said:

    +Major Support

    Let me just say for the record I have never gave a major support before. Hope has a lot of potential for staff, he has great leadership skills, is responsible and mature, and overall active.

    Hope is very active and I see him on a lot, I see him active in OOC, and when I speak to him he is a very nice person and chill would be great for staff! 

  2. 13 hours ago, Starstep said:

    +Support  Active and dedicated. This man was HCMD in E-11.

    +Support From the day I met this man he was a hard working guy, that didn't give up on his work that he was doing. He is very active, and I see him constantly around the community. 

  3. 9 hours ago, Starstep said:

    -Support  I'm sorry, but I don't recall ever seeing you in game? Also, your poll is public. It's supposed to be private..

    - Support Also not very active within the forums only 10 posts, and very far spread out. Try to get your name around a little more. 

  4. On 6/16/2020 at 10:07 PM, Starstep said:

    +Support  This man will be our night owl. In all seriousness though, I've seen Zeus taking sits before when no other staff were on. He did quite well. All of his warns are old, so I don't believe that they should be counted against him.

     

    20 hours ago, October said:

    +support 

    Reasons above, but I’ll throw in my own. 

    Zeus is an amazing guy who is quite dedicated to the server both from a staff perspective and an RP perspective. He would be a wonderful addition to staff team due to both his amazing judgement and his all around great personality. 

    Good luck Zeus. 

    ^^^^

    I am on somtimes late at night, but this man due to his time zone seems like he is always on. He is very active, and will do well I think in my eyes. 

    • Like 1
  5. On 6/10/2020 at 11:45 PM, Catsro said:

    +/- Support 
    I always thought RIG was made to fill the void of security/mtf not being able to escort research. That being said I would think that they would uphold the same properties by eliminating hostiles that might interfere with their escort. Now if RIG Units where just running around without an escort killing things it would be a different story entirely. I am also not opposed to suggestion being accepted as it wouldn't change much.

     

    On 6/11/2020 at 12:48 PM, Jack (utility one) said:

    E4 and CCs can still shoot us and HLPR Bots can be hacked and that's also gone down so I think it would be better to maybe move RIGS to self defense unless command can start enforcing the no lone wolf rule.

    +Support for reasons above.

  6. On 6/11/2020 at 9:54 PM, Fool said:

    If beanz can get the "OH fuck my eyes!" lights in his office CI can get the light to see the god damn table

    '-' MY EYES!!!!!

    On 6/11/2020 at 7:20 PM, Neo said:

    Yeah you can barley see the shit on the gambling table.
    +Support

    +Support for reasons above.

  7. On 6/14/2020 at 8:12 PM, Rabbit said:

    what about the rest of the rule?
     

    1) Non-Combatant Branches (Research and Utility) will not longer be able to call out / interfere with a Chaos Insurgency raid. This includes calling one out, shooting them, or in any way interfering with the raid. (Subnote: This does not include Mobile Mop Force or Advanced Combat Medic. HLPR Bot's and R.I.G's will count as Non-Combatant however.)

    2) Chaos Insurgency will no longer be able to shoot / interfere with Non-Combatants and their RP. This includes ALL Chaos Insurgency classes (Shades included!) besides the Spy classes (Maynard and Sleuth).

     

    Personally if you valued your life you would run away from the scary guys with guns, not standing around waiting to closing doors in their face or attacking them.
    I do think adding this to the MOTD would help flush out the problems we're having with the rule but it you have to hold both sides accountable.

     

     

    • If Non-combatants are running around with guns their going to get shot.
    • If Non-combatants are getting in the way their going to get shot.
    • If Non-combatants are going to try and close doors in CI face their going to get shot.
    • If Non-combatants are going to call out CI their going to get shot.
    • If Non-combatants are follow CI their going to get shot.

    What a Non-combatants does any of these it should be considered FailRP.  Other wise this rule is just one sided!

    The only way for this rule to be effective is to add it to the MOTD but this has to be done with great caution due to this rule bring able to ruin CI ability to raid.

     

     

     

     

    On 6/15/2020 at 3:47 AM, Falxen said:

    Friendly reminder, this is just for the rules in general to ensure that its clear to everyone, so if the RoE gets changed this will also have to be changed.

    +Support Well said Rabbit

  8. On 6/12/2020 at 6:20 PM, October said:

    -support

    I don’t understand how changing the name would inspire more people to fight in there. There’s no real advantage or need to change the name/remodel it. 

     

    On 6/15/2020 at 2:37 PM, CanOBeanz said:

    Just start calling it the Thunderdome yourself as a nickname if you want to?? 

    +/- support kind of a nothingburger tbh

    +/- support for what was said above. 

  9. On 6/12/2020 at 4:39 PM, Falxen said:

    +Support, if its possible to relocate 173. This would require quite a bit of map-redesign, but if it is possible it would be great to have.

    I like the idea, but I there is another map update in consideration to add a new hallway and it is possible that 173 may move there. 

  10. On 6/17/2020 at 12:14 AM, Catsro said:

    Again follow this format:

     

     

    On 6/17/2020 at 12:24 AM, Fool said:

    -Support

    Aside from the format

    Like the last one basically 035 2.0

    All said her again. 

  11. On 6/14/2020 at 6:26 AM, Falxen said:

    -Support, the whole reasoning here is to prevent D-Class from getting an advantage, because even without these Advantages D-Block already falls often enough.
     

    -Support If there is enough D Class you will have the upper advantage, I have had it several times, one person can't do it by themselves. gotta go in groups. 

  12. On 6/14/2020 at 5:58 PM, Masterson said:

    I've heard SMT etc talk about this numerous times, however, it increases playercount, which in the end increases our rank *gmod server rank*. Even if you get on the server at night and just go afk, it increase player count. Obviously the higher up in playercount we are more people we can bring into the server. With all this in mind I don't think this will happen, while mabye yes it could keep the server a bit less laggy. 👍

     

     

     

    7 hours ago, [GL] Dtscalice said:

    +support

    Overall i understand where people are coming from with the Gmod server rank but it sucks when on E11, Medical or Omi9 and ill be walking around for a little bit when all of a sudden it hits over 100 people and the server Lag/Crash screen shows up every 10 seconds-Every 2 minutes It just makes the server near unplayable at that point in my opinion

    I am going to do a +/- Support, because I feel as if for some people they afk for a short period of time because it takes them a while to actually log into the server sometimes 15 to 20 mins. I like the idea, but it can cause lose of player count. 

  13. On 6/14/2020 at 11:28 PM, October said:

    -support

    I don’t want to be rude, but I don’t believe that everyone deserves a statue for every little thing or else we’d run out of room.

     

    23 hours ago, Zone said:

    Look, I'm a fan. I think the statue should more just be about Jacks entirely, however. As much as we may not like to admit it, Jacks have made a pretty big impact on D-class, just like the Italian Mob.

    +Support

    +/- Support for reasons above. 

  14. On 6/12/2020 at 9:55 PM, Protoss said:

    -support

    Nah we good as it is

     

    5 hours ago, Blackbeard said:

    -Support

    -We need to focus on the MTF branches we have right now before we add another branch. It's a interesting Idea but i'm pretty sure Omega-7 doesn't exist anymore in lore.

    - Support, There was just recently a new MTF Branch kinda. it was a few months ago, but yes we do need to make sure things are stable on the server before adding a new branch. 

  15. 10 hours ago, Falxen said:

    -Support, due to lag concerns.

     

    54 minutes ago, Fool said:

    Bro those weapons you linked are props 

    +SUPPORT

    I HAVE MISSED DESTROYING HORDES OF D-CLASS WHO HAVE DEAGLES WE NEED THIS

    It can cause lag, but it is a fun thing to have on the server, we did have something like this before, but it did cause lag and we had to remove it. 

  16. On 6/2/2020 at 7:33 AM, October said:

    +/- support I believe this would be a fine system, but there should be a more regulation on it, and it should be a choice from dept. heads if they want it or not. Branches like MTF/CI don’t suffer like GENSEC does from slow promo’s/not noticing lower ranks. 

    I know in MTF branches we don't have as many people I think it would be best in huge branches such as security. I know in MTF if you are active you get noticed and things. but if this was for Gensec +Support, not sure about a server wide on it. 

  17. 8 hours ago, Falxen said:

    +Support, mostly because this would allow for the SCP's to be moved out of what used to be UTIL Spawns, and give research/tech/ET one or 2 empty rooms to use for construction/testing, since i do believe that has been a problem ever since SCP-173 was re-added and took its old CC Back.

     

    4 hours ago, Jack (utility one) said:

    +support
    If the rooms in the back are meant to replace the ones in utility bunks than yes. But if they are for new SCP's idk because with the HCZ Idea I think a lot of new SCP's are being added to fast, playable ones I mean. We need to make the server able to progress and if we add upon it over and over again really quick than it won't be able to add new stuff/harder to. I mean I love the idea it's just if those are new SCP's than I would believe either the HCZ suggestion or this one would be denied BUT be able to be implemented later on, as they are both good ideas and believe would be amazing.

    +Support, I feel like this can replace the area of utility bunks, but I think if they are going to introduce new SCPs, they will slowly do it, so they don't do a huge major update that would make some things less active, so a slow introduction to things would be better.

×
×
  • Create New...