Jump to content

Killer_Queen.exe

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Killer_Queen.exe

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Killer_Queen.exe's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. Name (In-Game/Discord): JR Killer Queen Rank (In-Game): Junior Researcher SteamID: STEAM_0:0:52679299 How active are you?: I'm active a couple of times a week because of summer classes. Concerns?: Will I be booted from the research team if I am busy with school?
  2. Sorry if those goes against any rules of posting links, I looked around for a while and couldn't find any. But here is the link to an image sharing website where I posted the image in better detail. https://ibb.co/FzYWfGk
  3. Your In-game: JR Killer Queen Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:52679299 The admin's name in-game: BOb the builder The admin's steam name (If you know it): N/A What warning did you receive: Staff Diss Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED): Why do you think this warn was false: I messaged in the admin chat why I was randomly warned since I was AFK at the time. BOb the builder teleported to me and told me that he had accidentally warned me instead of someone else. Any extra information: There was someone going around breaking some rules. He also had the word "Killer" in his name, so the admin must have accidentally warned me instead of him during an admin sit. There's no need to punish the admin if that's what happens when there's an accidental warn. It was an honest mistake and I can see how it could have easily happened. Also, sorry if the picture turns out blurry (if you need me to re-upload it a different way just ask me), it says in the chat "Senior Admin | BOb the builder: the warn was false for staff diss"
  4. Lore Name: JR Killer Queen Rank: Junior Researcher Clearance Level: 2 List of personnel involved in testing: 1 Junior Researcher and 1 Security Guard Level D personnel involved: 2 D-Class Personnel SCP: 173 Hypothesis: SCP-173 will react as normal if fed hamburgers. Observation: After the subjects were given the hamburgers and placed into SCP-173's containment, they went against what they were supposed to do and did not give the hamburgers to SCP-173. SCP-173 showed aggression as normal, but was demanding the hamburgers that the Class-D. After the D-Class still refused, SCP-173 turned more hostile and had terminated one of the subjects. The remaining subject was retrieved and had their memory wiped. Visual Stimuli (Photos/videos): N/A Errors and/or safety hazards: Class-D refused to cooperate. Conclusion: SCP-173 is attracted to hamburgers and will become more active around them. If not given the hamburgers it senses, it will become more aggressive.
  5. Lore Name: JR Killer Queen Rank: Junior Researcher Clearance Level: 2 List of personnel involved in testing: 1 Security Guard Level D personnel involved: 1 D-Class Personnel SCP: 999 Hypothesis: It is not possible to provoke SCP-999 in any way. Observation: The subject was told to start attacking SCP-999 both physically and verbally. The subject started beating on and shouting verbal insults at SCP-999. SCP-999 responded with healing any wounds that were on the subject, tickling the subject, and even tried playing with the subject while the subject was hostile towards it. The subject eventually stopped and said it could no longer continue because SCP-999 was too passive and too cute to harm. Visual Stimuli (Photos/videos): N/A Errors and/or safety hazards: None. Conclusion: It is impossible to aggravate or provoke SCP-999.
  6. Lore Name: JR Killer Queen Rank: Junior Researcher Clearance Level: 2 List of personnel involved in testing: 1 Security Guard Level D personnel involved: 1 D-Class Personnel SCP: 066 Hypothesis: Mimicing any sounds that SCP-066 make will provoke it. Observation: Subject refused to mimic SCP-066. Subject began to mimic me instead. Subject accidentally started to mimic SCP-066. SCP-066 was then provoked by this and began to attack the subject. This caused the subject to then lash out at me and the security guard. Subject was terminated. Visual Stimuli (Photos/videos): N/A Errors and/or safety hazards: The subject was not stripped of weapons before the test. Conclusion: SCP-066 will be provoked by anyone mimicking any noise that SCP-066 makes, even if it is on accident or if it is friendly.
  7. Lore Name: Killer Queen Rank: Junior Researcher Clearance Level: Level 2 List of personnel involved in testing: Vindertech Level D personnel involved: Joseph Nandes SCP: 173 Hypothesis: If you say pleasant and nice statements towards SCP-173, it will not be hostile to the subject. Observation: After listening to SCP-173 talking about how much it wanted to be let out and how much it wanted to break my neck. It responded to the subject's positive behavior towards it in an interesting way. The subject had started was nice to SCP-173, asking it friendly questions about its time in containment. The subject also commented positively on SCP-173's looks and even gave SCP-173 a kiss. SCP-173 seemed to grow a liking to the subject and left it alone. At the end of the test, the subject was not terminated and was let free from SCP-173's containment unharmed. SCP-173 even acted defensive towards the subject during the process of extracting the subject from SCP-173's containment. Visual Stimuli (Photos/videos): N/A Errors and/or safety hazards: There was no direct vision of the interaction between SCP-173 and the subject. The results were based on audio and the experience from the subject. Conclusion: SCP-173 will respond positive to friendly subjects. Possibly may become defensive of the subject during extraction. SCP-173 sees researchers as enemies. This friendly behavior to D-Class Personnel could be a rare occurrence and could require more testing.
×
×
  • Create New...