EPN Laggy Shadow Posted July 4, 2023 Share Posted July 4, 2023 (edited) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M8BE2fWIwirOe4GLK53bFh2CWHZgpqyW9OfVh3h4jy4/edit?usp=sharing Edited July 4, 2023 by EPN Laggy Shadow wrong name they took out RFA Grading Current: Deputy Head of Research! IM BACK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johny boi Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Grade: 81/100 Lore: 20/25While your SCP-500 background information pretty much covers everything that it does, I can't say the same for your SCP-610 background information. You included that it's biohazardous and no known cure has been found yet, but the same could be said for lots of other known diseases. There's not much description on how SCP-610 is unique to other biohazardous SCPs and why it's particularly difficult to contain, leaving a lot to be desired.Format: 22/25Pretty standard testing format, but considering these docs don't strictly have to follow the events of your test in rp, I would have liked to see something a bit more in the evidence/data portion. Presentation: 18/25There isn't much wrong with what you have presentation-wise. The font isn't too hard to read and the computerized style works quite well, however there's not much creativity here at all. There's no pictures of the SCPs or any Foundation logos other than the words "Secure. Contain. Protect." at the top that would add a lot of character to the doc.Writing: 21/25 You have a tendency to use the word "and" in sentences where a comma would suffice, making your sentences feel a bit choppy and drawn out a bit. The events of CI raiding mid testing isn't entirely necessary here either. Overall you did well though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts