5/13/20██ test on SCP-7274 Test: Reaction to varying temperatures

[Racc]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DINIfO5rkZ6aqlNOYlkWUiCCQgsa_0vvOuvk_A8ToBQ/edit

 

[bobawhy]

Your test log has been assigned for grading. Please wait 2-3 days for it to be fully graded.

[Johny boi]

Grade: 75/100

Lore: 25/25
The combination of in-game rp with SCP lore is great here. The inclusion of D-0498's childhood trauma with fire expressed in the form of a psych evaluation and the correct biohazardous containment procedure shown through the usage of a C.B.R.N. unit is good attention to detail where it was not entirely necessary. 
Format: 17.5/25

Pretty standard research format, nothing special and you followed it well for the most part. A little more adhesion to the scientific process would get you there.

Presentation: 22.5/25

This document looks great, the font choice isn't too hard on the eyes and the colors aren't terrible so no downsides there. Going back to attention to detail, the redaction of certain information along with the classification and picture of 7274 at the top are great. The pictures at the bottom almost feel out of place with how close up they are.

Writing: 10/25
Going back to the scientific process part, this is a research document and it feels like little new information was actually learned here. In the "SCP Overview Section" you have clearly stated that "instances of SCP-7274-1 are usually found in commonplace when a breakout event takes place when exposed to high temperatures or fire" and then your only included tests are raising and lowering the room temperature. Immediately after the trial data you have the addendum, but there feels like a huge gap in information from when the subjects skin began to move and when the breakout event included in the addendum occurred. 
Notes:
This document was a lot of fun to read, the additional information regarding your test subject was interesting and didn't feel too over the top or too lengthy. Some additional context on the pictures at the bottom would've been great to see(maybe a caption including location and damages). The only place you really lost a lot of points here was in the scientific process portion. This test felt uninspired and the results felt quite predictable. The lack of a solid hypothesis and conclusion is what killed the grade though, there's definitely a lot to be desired in the research part of this document. Like the trial data almost feels out of place among the amazing lore you included about the test subject.