Jump to content

Parkland27

Member
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Parkland27

  1. -support
    No Trainings on record (you were just Trained, just try if you can)

    No activity logs (only mentioned in a few activity logs)

    Plentiful of documents (in order of oldest to newest of 1/12/21
    Scp 1025 - 294 1/4
    Scp 294 - 173 3/4 
    Scp 096 - 294 4/4
    Scp 049 - 4/4
    Scp 999 - 0/4
    Scp 049 - 2/4
    Scp 049 - 008 2/4
    Scp 5208 - 1/4
    Scp 079 - 2/4

    Scp 5208 - 1048 3/4

    5208 juice - 1/4

    2191 blood type - 2/4

    2191 interview - 2/4
    Overall from my POV, very short documents, somewhat creative, somewhat repetitive, the fonts, I don't know what that is to be honest 

    Only about 20 days in research, I'm not going to count the old parts, as reasons for why he was retrained unknown, trained on 12/23/21. It really does help when you familiarize yourself in the branch

    Removed from CI for inactivity of 1/6/21, recorded on punishments

    Active unknown
    Behavior unknown
     

    Reason for -support, no activity logs, random disappears from research, especially being trained 3 different times, inactive from CI may prove differently if you are right or wrong for command. And as well for documents, shorter than me, everything else I've creative and Grammer is fine

  2. 4 hours ago, Loaff said:

    +support for shortening to 7 days

    Can't say any slur at all no matter if it's the hard r or not, even if used in a casual manner/not derogatory. 

    Ban shortened to 7 days is appropriate, the warn should've been for LTARP/NITRP as they weren't in a staff sit.

    its mainly my fault on the LTAP, thought maybe he already knew what it was due to a warn in 9/2018, 2nd its really hard to tell if he was LTAPing, or NITRP LTARP, just 'n-word' then leaves. but then again, i wasnt aware LTARP was a thing until now, but then again, how would i know, he hadnt even contacted me which could of helped remove the LTAP and not place something else, but then again, he wasnt in a sit so its my fault.

  3. 15 minutes ago, biggie said:

    Never have I ever received a warn or a ban (before this) in SCP-RP for any reason.

     

    If you mean in PoliceRP, that is a bad excuse because the one LTAP warn from this server is over four years old. Clearly, over four years, you could use some of your common sense and deduce that people can and do change over time.

     

    Also, as per the above video, I was clearly not in an admin sit when I disconnected, as explained in my OP.

    your not wrong, you werent in a sit, but some may see it as a LTAP since you were told to stop and all this other stuff or blah blah. all im saying, its my take, and your past warns was the reason what you received a LTAP on my side, if they would like to change it, its fine, and if i fucked up, its my fault. 

  4. Just now, [GL] Inaccurate said:

    Changing to -Support for lifting the ban, but + Support for shortening it to 7 days as LTARP  was added on to it. 1st offense for racism is 1 week, not 9 days.

    i dont mind whoever likes to change it, my apologies, i wasnt aware enough that LTARP was a thing so its my fault, but the racism is aparent

     

  5. -support (due to the audio not clearly stating what you said)

    -hockey was 035

    -bigmarsh was a class d

    -you were 8286

    1# scps arent not allowed to kill each other

    2# 035 is allowed to attack those in armory, and is allowed in as well

    Summary: without the audio its hard to tell what you were saying which could have shifted this more towards a warning either way if he was aware you were a scp. 

    If this were my sit, and i didnt hear the audio, and i wasnt able to hear you saying that you were a scp, it would be more of a verbal (mostly a verbal) its due to this (WITHOUT AUDIO No way of knowing you were a scp if you did or didnt say something unless you changed forms or told him)

    Now if there was audio and he heard you, it could go two ways, half and half, A) some are aware of what they did and do it on purpose, B) while some are not paying attention and this stuff can happen

    For A) obvious warning

    For B) most likely a verbal, (if past warns with the same issue, highly a warn) 

    So my punishmsnt to him would depend. If A is correct then a warn

    If B is correct without past warns with the same issue, it will be a verbal.

     

  6. On 12/5/2021 at 3:52 PM, The Light said:

    -Support
    Had to of been blacklisted from Dr Bright due to super mingy behavior

    I can confirm this, he just caused a lot of issue.

    Just please work on your behavior and focusing on the community man, if one person can do it, then you can.

  7. +/-support 

    From what im hearing you fucked up? Ive heard it was a joke you did or some shit, but i like to hear your side.

    Even if you fucked up, we will have to come to a point to move on, we either start doing that now, or it wont ever happen. I have seen this happened in a very prominent staff member, instead of being even more trouble, he turned his life around and did good, please do the same, i look for the positives and motive to change.

    -i will not quote your activity as i am not on during EU hours

    -application sounds generous

    -3 months 5 months 7 months, he has been here awhile, and i believe having a EU apart of the command, it can benefit the night time for those in low pop hours.

    -come find me, so i can learn more about you, this would be your usually idk you type thing, but let me discover who you really are as a player of the community, usually on around 630 pm est, and 2 am est (the later it is the likely hood you will not see me on)

  8. 18 minutes ago, Mr.Meeseeks 123 said:

    -/+ Support leaning to -

    + Good app 

    + Dedication

    - only became active when apps were out 

    - cant take things seriously some times

     

    I had to stop taking things seriously, because that caused major issues in security, research, and before i was in staff and learned to not be too serious, but thank you for letting me know, i will keep a look out and ask others around me

    and for the only active, i do plan on staying on, but you do have to understand, family, little brothers, and school.

    thank you for the reply😁👍

  9. +support

    From my understanding, you enjoy particaption, good, that will increase activity.

    Good amount lf documents as well as forum activity

    Since the whole wipe happened, i feel like you should be exempted from the idea of activity logs.

    And ive met you, and you are a sincere guy. And for those reading this and havent met him? come on really? discord call him, set up a meet and greet on the server to hang out. I shouldnt be seeing 'i dont know you' 

  10. 17 minutes ago, ENIRAC1987 said:

     

    ? i have heard rumors from some members that he is toxic but this is not true from what i saw, maybe it was a lie created to make him not reach command, this is just a theory i am not sure.

     

    Im already aware of this rumor, and have been through this issue, i dont know who started it, but it wont make me stop fighting for a spot in command, if you would like i can discuss it in discord if you like, dm me.

    OwOFurryFemboy#3598

  11. 8 hours ago, Nydekore said:

    -Support

    Unfortunately Parkland it seems you only really come back to being active when command apps open up. Consistency goes a long way when it comes to this sort of stuff.

    I wish you all the best.

    Your not wrong, your right, i chose to br less active as i wasnt able to do much, as i do enjoy doing mass test, and it was hard to find anyone to supervise me.

    And i know im not the only one here that actual does the same exact thing, and becoming active all of sudden, and only doing this during command apps.

    Actions speak louder than words, but depending how you might take this, but everything i say in that document, i mean it, im not able to do as much as a lr as much as a command.

    But i can tell you this, i will be active, and you wont regret having me in command, from what ive heard, the hard stuff sounds like fun to me.

    And let me ask you this, if i were put into command right now, what would be the first thing i would do?

     

     

  12. Name: Parkland27
    SteamID: STEAM_0:1:7956025
    Current Rank: LR

    Time in Research (Estimate): 140 days, 4 months, 20 days, since 1/26/2021

    Why do you believe you should be in Research Command?(100 word requirement): I feel like i have what it takes to be in command. To me updating rosters, hosting meetings, and doing all of that stuff sounds like fun to me. I've been here for awhile already, and I've learned a bit of things along the way. I've hosted a few mass tests, a lot not making it even to the test part. I don't mind working with people, and i take a lot of interest in working in something as hard as command. why should i also be in command? I work hard, i over come task after task, and it just gets more interesting. the only way i gain new experiences is if i'm taught, or put into that position,

    What can you bring to the table that others can't? (100 word requirement): Well I can bring new ideas, whether this be a new RRA agent training guide, help promote research, or even help out the Server. But mainly my focus would be on command itself. Dealing with situations like DNTs or removals, maybe even strikes. I'm mature and don't step out of line unless i actually need to. I look at researchers and critique them on what they could do or do better next time. The way you improve someone is by helping them, and guiding them, I don't see a lot of progress in stuff where people don't help. I work hard and get shit done as well. 

    What would you do to better Research and increase activity? (100 word requirement): The main issue about activity, its not the things you do, or say. but rather the things you can work out. You want 20 people on, get their attention, Its just like how kids like candy, adults like to relax. See where im getting at? instead of saying, or doing it, rather they 'want' thats how you bring people into this closed circle of activity. You want to get 20 people on? the best way I've seen people on, is you have to take it up a notch. something that really gets their attention. Now you might be saying how the fuck do we do this? depending on the people we have, others have different needs, and wants, that's what brings my attention. graphs, pie charts, and votes, can help you out in this, do they want to do a test on 999? figure out some votes. Would they like to make bets on something with the best test? then go act it. the thing is, you have to find the sweet spot, once you do, you get the 'want, need' a simple mass test ain't going to do shit, spice it up a bit, had some negatives, maybe a recent event, figure out what people 'want'

  13. Name: Parkland27, SEC WD Vespasian WD2D, SEC FTO MSGT Parkland27

    Rank: FTO MSGT

    SteamID: STEAM_0:1:7956025

    Current Sub-Branches your in: Wardens, FTO, Riot, Sniper, K9

    Why should you retain your rank (Command ONLY | 150+ words):

    Any Notes, Questions, or Concerns?: N/A

×
×
  • Create New...