Not Monkey Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Your In-game: Ben Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:9184165 The admin's name in-game:Prox The admin's steam name (If you know it): Steam Name: [GL] Prox / Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:14248048 What did the admin do: Denys to take a sit when he is only staff online/ i am trying to ask him a question and he says go to dms and i go into his dms and ask question for a warn he gave me asking where does it state it in the motd and he keeps denying the fact that its not stated then blocks me Evidence of the abusive action(s) (REQUIRED): What do you believe should happen to the admin: Striked Any extra information: As well he said it was stated in the SCP Rules even tho i was playing on a MTF Job As well the backround is not breaking discord tos Its a video game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fizz-y Soda Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Imagine not doing what you applied to do. Also seems like you're bias towards him. You're doing everything possible to not help him. +support CI CMDR / CA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Normally staff members have no reason to condone personal contact and without further proof I believe this holds true here. You don’t have evidence that Prox was the only staff member online who could’ve handled this sit. Prox’s only proven fault here is he should claim sits, even if they’re “mingy,” to clear them up quickly. Regarding the question about your previous warn, his response of “it’s in the MOTD” and “Make an appeal” is all he really has to give you. I understand your frustration with this but if you check the MOTD and it’s not there, that would be a super easy warn appeal. Truly false warnings don’t typically stick upon appeal. Overall, staff are only human and I myself would not be exactly pleased at getting bombarded with 3-5 dms every minute when I gave a response which the person did not bother look into. Overall, -support though Prox should be reinstructed on “not taking reports from minges”. 1 Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sprink Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, Nydekore said: Normally staff members have no reason to condone personal contact and without further proof I believe this holds true here. You don’t have evidence that Prox was the only staff member online who could’ve handled this sit. Prox’s only proven fault here is he should claim sits, even if they’re “mingy,” to clear them up quickly. Regarding the question about your previous warn, his response of “it’s in the MOTD” and “Make an appeal” is all he really has to give you. I understand your frustration with this but if you check the MOTD and it’s not there, that would be a super easy warn appeal. Truly false warnings don’t typically stick upon appeal. Overall, staff are only human and I myself would not be exactly pleased at getting bombarded with 3-5 dms every minute when I gave a response which the person did not bother look into. Overall, -support though Prox should be reinstructed on “not taking reports from minges”. Deputy Head of Security | Executive Event Team | Admin | Forum Diplomat | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giga Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 27 minutes ago, Nydekore said: Normally staff members have no reason to condone personal contact and without further proof I believe this holds true here. You don’t have evidence that Prox was the only staff member online who could’ve handled this sit. Prox’s only proven fault here is he should claim sits, even if they’re “mingy,” to clear them up quickly. Regarding the question about your previous warn, his response of “it’s in the MOTD” and “Make an appeal” is all he really has to give you. I understand your frustration with this but if you check the MOTD and it’s not there, that would be a super easy warn appeal. Truly false warnings don’t typically stick upon appeal. Overall, staff are only human and I myself would not be exactly pleased at getting bombarded with 3-5 dms every minute when I gave a response which the person did not bother look into. Overall, -support though Prox should be reinstructed on “not taking reports from minges”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Its Buck Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 -support until more info is provided 1) what was the sit about 2) what when did you receive? 3) is there evidence he was the only staff online? RETIRED SCP-RP:Delta-5 CPT | Deputy Head G9| Medical DHFW Doctor. | E11 1LT | Head Ranger | D4 Vanguard FF5 | RnD EOI V3 Canibal ImperialRP: MC 1LT Bacon 3817 | DT SGT FF5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piller Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 So to clarify, you hopped on IAA, which according to D5 SCMD you shouldn't have had access to, then you watch a disguised 8286 win a shoot out with MTF and "ID" him by fake rolling a 1. Prox then proceeds to pull you into a sit because he was on staff and patrolling and saw everything, he then warns you, and you make a sit just saying "prox". Prox encourages you to DM him if you have a question, during which you just start being obnoxious and saying "where in the motd is it?" repeatedly. He asks you to stop and then you report him. Not every single thing is in the MOTD. Some stuff just requires common sense. SCP-RP Head of Staff | Ethics Committee Chairman Former Nu-7 VCMDR l Former GenSec CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piller Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Denied SCP-RP Head of Staff | Ethics Committee Chairman Former Nu-7 VCMDR l Former GenSec CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts