Jump to content

106 Door rule missing? [MOTD Update Request] [Completed]


Kaizer

Should these rule be added to the MOTD?  

5 members have voted

  1. 1. Should these rule be added to the MOTD?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      0


Recommended Posts

After going through the motd I could not find anything about 106 not being able to close doors on his own, nor teleport through the sides, and I think this needs clarification.

Suggestion: Add a rule/two under SCP Rules>106 saying "SCP 106 Is not allowed to close doors." and "SCP 106 Is not allowed to teleport via his swep through the outlining/around doors if they are open"

Reason for this addition: Just like in the case with 096, being able to close doors on your own as 106 gives an unfair advantage to players around him, there is a good reason why foundation personnel are advised not to close doors when 106 is breached.

Reason for second addition: Being able to teleport through the side of the doors is going against the rule: "You can only teleport through doors and walls", though it technically counts as a wall, it is a doorway, which means they would be technically teleporting through an open door.
 

What are you suggesting? - View above

How would this change better the server? - View above

Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - No.

Who would this change mostly benefit? - Literally everyone.

Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A

~Kaizer

  • Like 1

Former: SeniorMod - Security CPT - Research RAM RHH Guardian Alpha 99-Agent Purple Rain

CCs: Kosher Inspectors - Security Black Ops - The Jokerz - Nobody

522575323_onepieceforums.png.98e609e9ad63d4c4031c515873bebb7e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support this has been a giant loophole for a while now and definitely needs to be fixed.  Also 106 is supposed to be more of a stealth-based ambush SCP, not something that just chases you around indefinitely and this rule clarification would help significantly with making players try to play as 106 as such.  It also makes sense that 106 can't open or close doors as he pretty much melts everything he touches, and wouldn't be able to work doors and instead would have to travel through them.

Edited by 1stSavagerY
  • Like 1

Nu-7 COL / SFTO / FE / TRT / BHM / RG / Head SCP-7101 / C0 FM HTF / SF Overseer / Iota-10 ("Damn Feds") / AFK / Solid Snake / SCP-RP Senior Moderator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 1stSavagerY said:

+support this has been a giant loophole for a while now and definitely needs to be fixed.  Also 106 is supposed to be more of a stealth-based ambush SCP, not something that just chases you around indefinitely and this rule clarification would help significantly with making players try to play as 106 as such.  It also makes sense that 106 can't open or close doors as he pretty much melts everything he touches, and wouldn't be able to work doors and instead would have to travel through them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 1stSavagerY said:

+support this has been a giant loophole for a while now and definitely needs to be fixed.  Also 106 is supposed to be more of a stealth-based ambush SCP, not something that just chases you around indefinitely and this rule clarification would help significantly with making players try to play as 106 as such.  It also makes sense that 106 can't open or close doors as he pretty much melts everything he touches, and wouldn't be able to work doors and instead would have to travel through them.

 

Its a video game

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Progress!

  • Heart-Eyes 2
  • Gaminglight Love 1

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...