Jump to content

Player Report Review Request - Sniper


Yellowjacket

Recommended Posts

Your in game name: Yellow

Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:44523937

The player's in game name: doctor sniperz (at the time of the incident)

The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:0:680762410

The original staff member's name: Ozzie

Date and Time This Incident Occurred: 09/09/22 16:30 EST

What did the player do: Break FearRP as SCP-049 when 3 weapons were pointed at them by turning me into an SCP-049-2 instance, as per General Rules, Rule 6.

What was the disposition of the sit (no action/verbal warning/formal warning/etc): No action was taken as the staff member argued that in order to FearRP SCP 049 all of the SCP 049-2 instances have to be killed first.

Why do you think the disposition was inappropriate?: No such rule or condition exists within the MOTD that would state that all of the SCP 049-2 instances have to be killed before SCP-049 can be FearRPd.

Evidence (required): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/Acy09bWIEHyDV/d1337zS8twO5?invite=cr-MSx0Q1YsMzE0NjU4Njcs

Any extra information: As you can see in the clip, 3 people with weapons were in the hallway where SCP-049 turned me into an SCP-049-2 instance.

Fear, full of hate perforates me like a yellowjacket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, [GL] Fizz-y Soda said:

Dropping this image here. 

SmartSelect_20220909_154728_Opera.jpg

-support

After watching the clip, i don't hear anyone screaming fearrp. 

Everything happened so fast and the third guy behind you was so far behind. 

-Support

Ozzie made the right call here

Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yellowjacket said:

It doesn't say that anywhere? Also it wasn't multiple instances just one, but that is irrelevant.

It says that once all 049-2 instances are terminated, 049 can be terminated

| EX CI General | | Ex Lead Admin | 
| The best Fruit to exist |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Pills said:

-Support

I agree with what Ozzie said!!1

 

28 minutes ago, Chineseman said:

-Support there was a 049 instance he can't be fear RP no rules broken here.

 

 

2 hours ago, K I W I said:

-Support
Rules are pretty clear, he can't be fear Rp'ed with multiple 049-2 instances

Are you implying that 049 cannot be FearRPd if there are 049-2 that are not terminated? Because that's not what the rules say.

Fear, full of hate perforates me like a yellowjacket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Yellowjacket said:

 

 

Are you implying that 049 cannot be FearRPd if there are 049-2 that are not terminated? Because that's not what the rules say.

image.thumb.png.569670cb6e31dbc38c043dd2aa6e29ff.png
Per the Self Breach rules for SCP 049 and SCP 049-2. "SCP-049's self breaching process can be stopped by MTF terminating all 049-2 instances and FearRPing SCP-049" This process also applies to recontaining the SCP. You are unable to FearRP combatants, you have 3 people, SCP-049-2 is not fearrp able, therefor you can not actively FearRP SCP-049 in this situation. The full set of rules for this situation, and FearRPing SCP-049 are a combination of his own personal SCP rules along with the rules for general FearRP.

With this and all things listed above, I am going to heavily -Support, Ozzie definitely made the right call.

Edited by Goat
Further information

|   Head Administrator  |  Director of Intelligence  |

| Death Trooper Commander Epsilon-11 Commander Alpha-1 Commander High General Goat | Shock Vice Commander |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Goat said:

image.thumb.png.569670cb6e31dbc38c043dd2aa6e29ff.png
Per the Self Breach rules for SCP 049 and SCP 049-2. "SCP-049's self breaching process can be stopped by MTF terminating all 049-2 instances and FearRPing SCP-049" This process also applies to recontaining the SCP. You are unable to FearRP combatants, you have 3 people, SCP-049-2 is not fearrp able, therefor you can not actively FearRP SCP-049 in this situation.

With this and all things listed above, I am going to heavily -Support, Ozzie definitely made the right call.

Yes the SCP can be considered recontained when the 049-2 Instances are killed, that's now what we are talking about here, what I am saying is that 049 can be FearRPd even if instances of 049-2 exist, it just doesn't say otherwise anywhere in the MOTD. I'm not sure what you mean by "you are unable to fear RP combatants" yes you are but that's completely besides this entire report as no combatants were being FearRPd, SCP 049-2 isnt FearRPable and we were not trying to do so, however 049 had three people with weapons on him and therefore was under FearRP as previously stated.

Edited by Yellowjacket

Fear, full of hate perforates me like a yellowjacket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FORUMS DIPLOMAT MESSAGE:

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM ARGUING AND KEEP ALL RESPONSES TO + OR - SUPPORT. FURTHER ARGUING WILL RESULT IN THIS THREAD BEING LOCKED AND POSSIBLE WARNINGS ON YOUR ACCOUNT.

  • Like 1
  • Dislike 1
  • Gaminglight Love 1

SCP-RP Head of Staff | Ethics Committee Chairman

Former Nu-7 VCMDR l Former GenSec CPT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- support
 

17 hours ago, Yellowjacket said:

No such rule or condition exists within the MOTD that would state that all of the SCP 049-2 instances have to be killed before SCP-049 can be FearRPd.


there indeed is a written rule on this, as stated by others

SCPRP: AHOME | Nu-7 Quartermaster | E11 Staff Sergent | Senior Medical Specialist | Experienced Marksman | Junior Combat Engineer | Rapid Response Team | Ranger |
SWRP: Pyke Soldier I | ST SFC | Apprentice IV

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denied

  • Like 1

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...