Jump to content

Sage admin report- Denied


AcidTest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your In-game: Cross

 

Your SteamID: N/A

 

The admin's name in-game: Sage

 

The admin's steam name (If you know it): Sage

 

What did the admin do:

Locked my ban appeal with the false accusation of arguing happening in the thread. There was no arguing. 

Evidence of the abusive action(s) (REQUIRED):

https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/90871-banned-appeal/

What do you believe should happen to the admin:

Unlock the thread and tell the admin who continually harasses me to stay away.

 

It's a disgraceful situation. A total witch hunt. I've been saying it for a long time. This is the most biased group of people. Theses people have the biggest conflicts of interests I have ever seen. It's a disgrace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin

-Support

In the topic thread in question, there were a total of two forum diplomats that had made messages on your post, which one of them was a senior diplomat. Since these diplomats had deemed content on the post to be in violation of forum rules, which happened even after they had given users a clear warning the thread may become locked due to this behavior, neither diplomat (including Sage) would be in violation of the staff or forum diplomat handbooks.

 

Moved to correct section.

Edited by Will
  • Thanks 2
  • Gaminglight Love 1

rsz_1rsz_1will2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn’t harassment for him to do his job. When you scream “witch hunt” and minus rep everyone on your ban appeal that’s obvious arguing, especially when you made a snarky reply to each and every -Support. Sage was simply doing his job, you’re being ridiculous.

 

-Support

  • Like 1
  • Dislike 1

Retired

Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 DHFTO Captain | SCPRP Super Admin

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head of Staff
42 minutes ago, Will said:

-Support

In the topic thread in question, there were a total of two forum diplomats that had made messages on your post, which one of them was a senior diplomat. Since these diplomats had deemed content on the post to be in violation of forum rules, which happened even after they had given users a clear warning the thread may become locked due to this behavior, neither diplomat (including Sage) would be in violation of the staff or forum diplomat handbooks.

 

Moved to correct section.

 

FiveM SMT | Head of Staff | Mafia Boss
Former ImperialRP Head Admin / High Admiral / DT Commander / First Pyke Boss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not attempting to incite anything here. Just stating my side.

I -supported your application due to the nature of your responses, reactions, and mannerisms. You then used that as a reason to attack me. You incited an argument, Name told you to stop, you then attempted to re-ignite an argument by stating something along the lines of "This server is unfair and is ran like Stalin in the 30's"

1 hour ago, AcidTest said:

What do you believe should happen to the admin:

Unlock the thread and tell the admin who continually harasses me to stay away.

spacer.png
*cough cough*
You're playing the victim card so insanely hard. You messaged me.

Current: William LeDonce - Mafia | Anthony Dewlong - EMS | Daniel Eddelsburg - LSPD
Former: Imperial High Command | Deathtrooper Senior Commander | Senior Admin | Senior Forum Diplomat | Support Member

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Will said:

-Support

In the topic thread in question, there were a total of two forum diplomats that had made messages on your post, which one of them was a senior diplomat. Since these diplomats had deemed content on the post to be in violation of forum rules, which happened even after they had given users a clear warning the thread may become locked due to this behavior, neither diplomat (including Sage) would be in violation of the staff or forum diplomat handbooks.

 

Moved to correct section.

 

16 minutes ago, sage said:

Not attempting to incite anything here. Just stating my side.

I -supported your application due to the nature of your responses, reactions, and mannerisms. You then used that as a reason to attack me. You incited an argument, Name told you to stop, you then attempted to re-ignite an argument by stating something along the lines of "This server is unfair and is ran like Stalin in the 30's"

spacer.png
*cough cough*
You're playing the victim card so insanely hard. You messaged me.

-support

for the reasons listed above, your mannerism needs to change. this is ridiculous.

FBI DCOS | FTO Director | HRT 1LT | PPD Overseer | Forum Diplomat | PoliceRP Admin | Event Team Coordinator

Former | State 1T | Lord III | PO2 | Imperial Senior Mod | GM3

787250718_Myproject.png.29fd4a048f29805afc636c4253e40705.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Will said:

-Support

In the topic thread in question, there were a total of two forum diplomats that had made messages on your post, which one of them was a senior diplomat. Since these diplomats had deemed content on the post to be in violation of forum rules, which happened even after they had given users a clear warning the thread may become locked due to this behavior, neither diplomat (including Sage) would be in violation of the staff or forum diplomat handbooks.

 

Moved to correct section.

 

ImperialRP
Ex. Grand Inquisitor   / Ex. Lead Administrator / Ex. High Command / Ex. Support Advisor /  Ex. Senior Diplomat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sage said:

Not attempting to incite anything here. Just stating my side.

I -supported your application due to the nature of your responses, reactions, and mannerisms. You then used that as a reason to attack me. You incited an argument, Name told you to stop, you then attempted to re-ignite an argument by stating something along the lines of "This server is unfair and is ran like Stalin in the 30's"

spacer.png
*cough cough*
You're playing the victim card so insanely hard. You messaged me.

 

| FIRST EVER IMPERIAL GOVERNOR |
| Former 501st "Vader's Fist" Legion Commander ||Former Senior Commander|| Former SF Crimson ||Former IF Agent Lone Six |
Imperial RP Senior Administrator || Forums Diplomat || Former Imperial RP Gamemaster VII || Retired 501st VCMDR |
season 1 duel of the droids GIF by Star Wars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello AcidTest, to be honest I was kinda wondering too, I think its just about the wording. The wording is wrong. Because the first forum diplomat says "Arguing between each other is prohibited.
Failure to do so and continued arguing will result in forums warnings/restrictions being handed out as well as this topic being locked" however it does NOT seem like anyone were arguing after that? So not sure why Sage locked it and claimed someone argued, even though there wasn't. 

 

So you are right in a way, I am just not sure if an admin report is like the correct solution, also I don't think anyone would really care too much about it. I know you made a ban appeal and I think it got denied and hey man, I know how it is, I myself been trying to appeal for like 5-6 months  now erm, and I know you might be angry and feel hurt my friend but, this does not help you brother. Just be happy your ban is only 3 days and not permanent 💖

^^ Before edit

 

-Support sry

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EDIT: Okay so the post that contained arguing was hidden so it made sense that Sage locked it. But Acid, just because forum diplomats lock them I dont think it will get auto-denied I think  it depends maybe, what do I know im not staff 🙂 But yeah man, have a good night and goodluck in the future man.

Edited by Gustav
Sage informed us that the post were hidden so yeah it makes sense.

| Ex DT S06/DT CPT DK0 | Ex 501st ARC JTL 3010 COL Gustav | EU 

               

                                                  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gustav said:

Hello AcidTest, to be honest I was kinda wondering too, I think its just about the wording. The wording is wrong. Because the first forum diplomat says "Arguing between each other is prohibited.
Failure to do so and continued arguing will result in forums warnings/restrictions being handed out as well as this topic being locked" however it does NOT seem like anyone were arguing after that? So not sure why Sage locked it and claimed someone argued, even though there wasn't. 

 

So you are right in a way, I am just not sure if an admin report is like the correct solution, also I don't think anyone would really care too much about it. I know you made a ban appeal and I think it got denied and hey man, I know how it is, I myself been trying to appeal for like 5-6 months  now erm, and I know you might be angry and feel hurt my friend but, this does not help you brother. Just be happy your ban is only 3 days and not permanent 💖

^^ Before edit

 

-Support sry

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EDIT: Okay so the post that contained arguing was hidden so it made sense that Sage locked it. But Acid, just because forum diplomats lock them I dont think it will get auto-denied I think  it depends maybe, what do I know im not staff 🙂 But yeah man, have a good night and goodluck in the future man.

Yea, there was a reply hidden in that thread. Although it wasn't complete yet. It wasn't arguing, just comparing similarities between the ban appeal process and show trials.

I'm just so tired, was banned about a week ago on the PD server. The appeal process turned into a total witch hunt with their side losing all their evidence to a "filled drive." Imperial Ban was even more of a witch hunt with a trial mod sent out there to read a script. It's all so tiring. 

But yea probably going to wait this one out and make sure to record every session. Thanks friend. 

Edited by AcidTest
.

It's a disgraceful situation. A total witch hunt. I've been saying it for a long time. This is the most biased group of people. Theses people have the biggest conflicts of interests I have ever seen. It's a disgrace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AcidTest said:

Yea, there was a reply hidden in that thread. Although it wasn't complete yet. It wasn't arguing, just comparing similarities between the ban appeal process and show trials.

I'm just so tired, was banned about a week ago on the PD server. The appeal process turned into a total witch hunt with their side losing all their evidence to a "filled drive." Imperial Ban was even more of a witch hunt with a trial mod sent out there to read a script. It's all so tiring. 

But yea probably going to wait this one out. Thanks friend. 

Yeah, you have a good one mate, everyone can make mistakes.

Edited by Gustav

| Ex DT S06/DT CPT DK0 | Ex 501st ARC JTL 3010 COL Gustav | EU 

               

                                                  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Will said:

-Support

In the topic thread in question, there were a total of two forum diplomats that had made messages on your post, which one of them was a senior diplomat. Since these diplomats had deemed content on the post to be in violation of forum rules, which happened even after they had given users a clear warning the thread may become locked due to this behavior, neither diplomat (including Sage) would be in violation of the staff or forum diplomat handbooks.

 

Moved to correct section.

 

-IC CMDR 1138 Boss -Senior Admin  -Senior Gamemaster 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DENIED

No violations are seen by SMT in this report. The specified player will not be punished.

〖  ImperialRP 〗 | Former Senior Management Team | Head of Staff |

〖  Divisions 〗| Former Head Forum Diplomat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...