Jump to content

Warning Appeal Biggie Cheese


Biggie Cheese1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Biggie Cheese Warn Appeal

Your In-game Name: Biggie Cheese

Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:616260174

The admin's name in-game: Agent Grizzley

What warning did you receive: ARDM

When did you receive this warning: 12/3/2022

Please give a description of the situation that led to the warning: I was running around EZ waiting for meeting, saw the dog, shot the dog once with a pistol and ran when it started chasing me, then it kept using its swep on me and got me to 7 hp and i shot it again, after i got healed by a D5 i went AFK waiting for Utility Meeting, i come back 20 mins later and got warned while AFK, i only know i got warned because Will told me once i got back.

Why do you think this warn was false: I dont think this warn is valid due to the dog having basically god mode and also i only shot it once with a pistol and once in self defence

Evidence the warning is false: I was AFK I wouldn't have been able to record/screenshot if I wanted to, seems like an unfair warn considering literally everyone shoots the "god mode" SCP's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support 

dog is immortal what is he gonna do?! Kill him???

MTF Nu7 HTRT COL /Retired CI R&D SARCH Pure

Staff Ranks:SCPRP Admin, Support team, 
CC's Joined so far: Class D Commando, XG56-Orion's Belt, Noble-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mass +support

Litterly no reason for this warn, after looking in looks 1424 was the one that fail rped as she attacked biggie and a d5 officer

my side of the story:

I took the sit, i looked at combat logs and saw  the damage. She then accused biggie of faking being afk. I then explained that I was going to figure it out and she then claimed I was being biased because I said hes not faking afk? She requested another staff member, I requested in staff chat. Billybob responded{agent grizly) did not give biggie a chance to speak as he was afk and warned him within 2 minutes of being in the sit. He also wouldn't let me speak. This warning is false as its completely un needed and doesn't make much sense at all. I think that the 1424 should be warned for ARDM and failrp. Terrible decision making on this sit.

 

oofwill2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+ Support
This is by far the most unreasonable way to be warned.
The SCP at question is virtually invincible and the only thing that could Possibly kill it
would be a micro or !slay command.

 | | Been here for 3 years might as well stay 🙂 | Donator | Kind of a Minge 🙂 | "when you're drunk as fuck, you feel no pain" - Yohan 2022 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wtf!?

+support

the scp is literally impossible to kill.

warning was unreasonable

 

Current: CI HLS Major || Bananana

Former: CI R&D AIN, E11 CPT, and Research Assistant Manager.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Biggie Cheese1 said:

I was running around EZ waiting for meeting, saw the dog, shot the dog once with a pistol and ran

+Support on rewording of warn to "FailRP"

It was poor decision making on my part I will agree,.  I'll admit my fault with this, but was going with all the information I was presented at the time, where Biggie had shot first, alongside with him being a noncombatant attacking an SCP would fall under FailRP instead of ARDM. In the quoted message he even confirms that he shot first. I don't believe it matters if the SCP is "godded"  When a noncombatant attacks an allied SCP that would still be failRP.  But if anyone has some information to shed on this I'd greatly accept it.

Foundation Dr. Placeholder McDoctorate | RFA Grand Operations AdvisorWanderers Library Award Recipient X2 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pure said:

+support 

dog is immortal what is he gonna do?! Kill him???

 

CURRENT RANKS SCPRP: E-11=MAJ GENSEC=MAJ MEDICAL=SM MAINTENANCE=ME  RRH=Bravo 13

CURRENT RANKS POLICERP: FBI:SNR PD:OFC

CHAD WITH GOLDENPAN

1221471908_Screenshot2022-04-11213255.png.4efbab2f482f5f439d292f43c95dcde9.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JDWhatever said:

+Support on rewording of warn to "FailRP"

It was poor decision making on my part I will agree,.  I'll admit my fault with this, but was going with all the information I was presented at the time, where Biggie had shot first, alongside with him being a noncombatant attacking an SCP would fall under FailRP instead of ARDM. In the quoted message he even confirms that he shot first. I don't believe it matters if the SCP is "godded"  When a noncombatant attacks an allied SCP that would still be failRP.  But if anyone has some information to shed on this I'd greatly accept it.

Disagree, this warn should be completely removed. Dog attacked him and failrped, I believe Tiny should be the one warned. Biggie should never and should not have this on  his record period.

 

oofwill2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JDWhatever said:

+Support on rewording of warn to "FailRP"

It was poor decision making on my part I will agree,.  I'll admit my fault with this, but was going with all the information I was presented at the time, where Biggie had shot first, alongside with him being a noncombatant attacking an SCP would fall under FailRP instead of ARDM. In the quoted message he even confirms that he shot first. I don't believe it matters if the SCP is "godded"  When a noncombatant attacks an allied SCP that would still be failRP.  But if anyone has some information to shed on this I'd greatly accept it.

 

Demonically Inspired ..Nu7 CMDR rem love GIF

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+ Support on removing the warn

As far as I know, it is only against the rules if 1424 asked Biggie to stop, which wasn't the case.

Current: Inferno Squad Junior Agent, Royal Guard Cadet
Former: CI 2LT DHLS, E11 Sergeant Major,  Maintenance Professional

c7.jpg.e0bbf2b7aed5a169d941bb4a43d4bf5c.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JDWhatever said:

+Support on rewording of warn to "FailRP"

It was poor decision making on my part I will agree,.  I'll admit my fault with this, but was going with all the information I was presented at the time, where Biggie had shot first, alongside with him being a noncombatant attacking an SCP would fall under FailRP instead of ARDM. In the quoted message he even confirms that he shot first. I don't believe it matters if the SCP is "godded"  When a noncombatant attacks an allied SCP that would still be failRP.  But if anyone has some information to shed on this I'd greatly accept it.

 

SCP-RP | Maintenance Expert | HLPR Bot bT5 | Senior Researcher | Senior Event Team Member

Custom Classes | Umbrella Corporation Operative

"Pathos"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support

As much as I disagree with this warn it was a valid one.

As stated in the MOTD under the all players section,

11. Players are not allowed to intentionally shoot SCPs with the exception of SCP 035-1, SCP 049-2, SCP 076-2, SCP 194, SCP 682, SCP 939, SCP 966, SCP 1048, SCP 1048-A, SCP 2191, SCP 1245-2, SCP 1265-A, and SCP 5208.

However I do support the player on 1424 also being warned.

  • Like 1

THE BEST AMPHIBIAN

Custom Classes | Cybernetic Protective Unit Owner | A Normal D-Class Owner |          D-7025 Member

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Diz said:

+ Support on removing the warn

As far as I know, it is only against the rules if 1424 asked Biggie to stop, which wasn't the case.

 

Current GenSec MSGT Elite Medic CI LCPL SCP:RP Senior Moderator Former GenSec MAJ | Former SCP:RP Admin and Forum Diplomat Former Event Team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support, as stupid as it may seem to get warned for something so small, it's still ARDM; you shouldn't be shooting the dog and it is up to the staff member in the sit to give you a verbal or not.

Screenshot_13.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, oofWill said:

Disagree, this warn should be completely removed. Dog attacked him and failrped, I believe Tiny should be the one warned. Biggie should never and should not have this on  his record period.

Shooting Safe SCP's is FailRP. You should get them facts right. 

-Support

though it should be changed to failrp. 

Whos the minge? 

Former: Lead Shadow Guard & SNR Royal Guard, former Imperial Moderator  SCPRP: Moderator/Event Team  CI FTO MSGT/CI R&D Initiate inspector THE EYE OF [DATA EXPUNGED]  Head of Field Research Security Black Ops Mr:33 warns 

Current: MTF Alpha-1 "Red Right Hand" Guardian Alpha 6      MTF E-11 JFTO SGT      Security LCPL 🤓        

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, islandtoad said:

-Support

As much as I disagree with this warn it was a valid one.

As stated in the MOTD under the all players section,

11. Players are not allowed to intentionally shoot SCPs with the exception of SCP 035-1, SCP 049-2, SCP 076-2, SCP 194, SCP 682, SCP 939, SCP 966, SCP 1048, SCP 1048-A, SCP 2191, SCP 1245-2, SCP 1265-A, and SCP 5208.

However I do support the player on 1424 also being warned.

Agreed on both parts.

 

7 hours ago, Diz said:

+ Support on removing the warn

As far as I know, it is only against the rules if 1424 asked Biggie to stop, which wasn't the case.

Yeah, there's definitely no rule stating you can shoot them unless asked to stop. It's what a lot of staff/players go by, but it's not an actual rule, thus the warn is actually valid. I personally wouldn't warn for it, but it is valid.

Nu-7 VCMDR l SCP-RP JMT l Support Team Advisor l Forum Diplomat l Former GenSec CPT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-support

It is still failRP, however there is evidence of 1424 doing failRP as well so you can make a report using the evidence provided as 1424 most certainly should be warned for his part as well.

Edit: I do +support to change of the warn from ARDM to FailRP

Edited by Cecil Stedmen

Current SCPRP:  CI R&D Chief Inspector || Exemplary Investigator Award Recipient

Former ImperialRP: Naval Captain || Security Director || GM VI 

Former SCPRP: Research Administrator || RFA Operations Advisory || RRH Analyst Xray 77 || Event Team Member

Former PoliceRP: EMS Captain || RRU Rapid Response Team Manager || FBI Assistant Director 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/13/2022 at 4:39 AM, JDWhatever said:

+Support on rewording of warn to "FailRP"

It was poor decision making on my part I will agree,.  I'll admit my fault with this, but was going with all the information I was presented at the time, where Biggie had shot first, alongside with him being a noncombatant attacking an SCP would fall under FailRP instead of ARDM. In the quoted message he even confirms that he shot first. I don't believe it matters if the SCP is "godded"  When a noncombatant attacks an allied SCP that would still be failRP.  But if anyone has some information to shed on this I'd greatly accept it.

 

Nova Major Comet NT05 | Retired Stormtrooper Major
Former Admin | Former GM Tick X

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support

The Dog immortal and the fact he shot once most likely in a jump scare then started moving away in fairness the player RPing as the dog would have been warned for ARDM so this warn should be removed

SEC SM

JM

SCP-RP Moderator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2022 at 5:15 PM, oofWill said:

Mass +support

Litterly no reason for this warn, after looking in looks 1424 was the one that fail rped as she attacked biggie and a d5 officer

my side of the story:

I took the sit, i looked at combat logs and saw  the damage. She then accused biggie of faking being afk. I then explained that I was going to figure it out and she then claimed I was being biased because I said hes not faking afk? She requested another staff member, I requested in staff chat. Billybob responded{agent grizly) did not give biggie a chance to speak as he was afk and warned him within 2 minutes of being in the sit. He also wouldn't let me speak. This warning is false as its completely un needed and doesn't make much sense at all. I think that the 1424 should be warned for ARDM and failrp. Terrible decision making on this sit.

 

Research Administrator [RA] Professor [PRF] I MTF Nu7 BHM SM Tyler Portal I Senior Event Team Member [SET]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin

Both people were in the wrong in this report. The warned player should have been warned for FailRP as he shot SCP-1424 which is not to be shot. 

But, the player SCP-1424 was in the wrong for attacking him as an immortal SCP without valid reasoning. 

The player should have made a sit for FailRP/ARDM/RDM for the dog attacking him. 

This report is being accepted but the warned player will have their warn updated to FailRP. 

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin

Accepted

To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post.

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...