Yellowjacket Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 What are you suggesting? - Allow Sarkic to breach SCP-939 and SCP-2191-1 during raids. Both of these SCPs are linked to Sarkicisim. SCP-939 were created within SCP-2688, as a result of one of Yaldabaoth's underground pieces mutating the unborn children of SCP-2688's citizen. SCP-2191-3: A massive sub-terranean organism buried under Romania. The organism deploys SCP-2191-1 to collect human blood for sustenance. It is also sustained by Proto-Sarkic cults sacrifices. The Sarkites claim that the organism is called the "Mother", once a beautiful princess who was the daughter of the "Blood Empress". The princess became Grand Karcist Ion's favored concubine and started to bear his children. These same cults claim that the the Mother would soon give birth to the "Gods". How would this change better the server? - It would give the Sarkic more things to do during a raid. At the moment they are only allowed to breach SCP-610, this would give them more options when that SCP is not flagged on. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Obviously the foundation would be put in a disadvantage by this since the Sarkic can now cause more issues inside the facility during their raid. Perhaps an additional rule could be implemented that they may only breach one SCP per raid to combat any imbalances caused by this change. Who would this change mostly benefit? - It would benefit the Sarkic. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A Fear, full of hate perforates me like a yellowjacket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 (edited) -Support Sarkics are strong as is, even if it’d make some sense lorewise Sarkics are not meant to be breaching much as SCPs are already regularly breached by CI and dclass. If implemented that 1 breach per raid rule would need to be added as well though Edited November 30, 2021 by Nydekore Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yato Sensei Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 - Support We'd be getting WAAAAY too many people that can breach stuff. You already have D class/CI/Maynard breaching stuff, it'd be a bit too much if we start adding more and more to sarkics roster. 610 can be pretty powerful if played by the right person. Joined 09/30/2020Retired 11/12/2022Former Security SFC || Former MTF Omi9 MSGT || Former CI CPT/MAJ || Former Nu7 LTCOL/VCMDR || Former E11 CPL || Former Maintenance Professional || Former D5 CPT || Former Senior Medic || Former Advanced Researcher | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon Dice Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 20 minutes ago, Yato Sensei said: - Support We'd be getting WAAAAY too many people that can breach stuff. You already have D class/CI/Maynard breaching stuff, it'd be a bit too much if we start adding more and more to sarkics roster. 610 can be pretty powerful if played by the right person. Demonically Inspired ..Nu7 CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loaff Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Yato Sensei said: - Support We'd be getting WAAAAY too many people that can breach stuff. You already have D class/CI/Maynard breaching stuff, it'd be a bit too much if we start adding more and more to sarkics roster. 610 can be pretty powerful if played by the right person. I've seen 610 wipe LCZ and control it for a solid 10 minutes on over 100 players before, sarkics being able to breach it is quite enough. Former Ranks Head Of Maintenance And Engineering Senior Admin Support Supervisor Forum Diplomat Custom Classes The Sniper (Owner) XG56-Orion's Belt (Owner) The Engineer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recon Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Yato Sensei said: - Support We'd be getting WAAAAY too many people that can breach stuff. You already have D class/CI/Maynard breaching stuff, it'd be a bit too much if we start adding more and more to sarkics roster. 610 can be pretty powerful if played by the right person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a frog Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 (edited) -support Honestly tho even tho its lore wise this is still a gaminglight server (lore is barley used on here) And a huge part of ci's gameplay mechanic is to kill people/rescue d class/ and breach scps and I think if we allowed sarkic to breach even more scps besides 610 that would just go to far into ci's territory. Edited December 1, 2021 by frog E11 1LT []FORMER CI MAJOR[]Former MTF OMICRON-9 CAPTAIN[]Former Janitorial Low Command[]Former E11 HCMD[Former overseer of D4,Former experimental, Former E4]"The fuck is a ethics committee?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diz Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 On 11/30/2021 at 10:47 PM, Yato Sensei said: - Support We'd be getting WAAAAY too many people that can breach stuff. You already have D class/CI/Maynard breaching stuff, it'd be a bit too much if we start adding more and more to sarkics roster. 610 can be pretty powerful if played by the right person. ^This is also why they don’t add Serpent’s Hand Retired SCP-RP Admin/ETM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueidk Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 On 11/30/2021 at 1:47 PM, Yato Sensei said: - Support We'd be getting WAAAAY too many people that can breach stuff. You already have D class/CI/Maynard breaching stuff, it'd be a bit too much if we start adding more and more to sarkics roster. 610 can be pretty powerful if played by the right person. Frfr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stSavagerY Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 On 11/30/2021 at 4:29 PM, Nydekore said: -Support Sarkics are strong as is, even if it’d make some sense lorewise Sarkics are not meant to be breaching much as SCPs are already regularly breached by CI and dclass. If implemented that 1 breach per raid rule would need to be added as well though Nu-7 COL / SFTO / FE / TRT / BHM / RG / Head SCP-7101 / C0 FM HTF / SF Overseer / Iota-10 ("Damn Feds") / AFK / Solid Snake / SCP-RP Senior Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmic Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 -Support 610 is enough, can easily cause code red 1 EX Head Of Staff SCP-RP | CI will forever be in my heart. 1/15/21 - 8/1/22 (CI CMDR Cosmic ITLY) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaInShitpostLand Posted December 6, 2021 Share Posted December 6, 2021 I would be fine with this if they could only breach 1 SCP during a raid, and if that SCP is still breached the next time Sarkic raids they cant breach again until its RC'ed. The God Gamer of the Shitpost Squadron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZJ Posted December 22, 2021 Share Posted December 22, 2021 +support, seems like another suggestion is about to take away something from sarkic, I believe they should be able to breach at least one or two SCPs | SEC Armored Shield 1LT Wardens WC DHFTO | SVFTO Elite Medic | SVFTO Maintenance Expert | Xray 42 | E11 CPL | Nu7 CPL | D5 PVT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted December 23, 2021 Share Posted December 23, 2021 Breaching 610 is enough in my opinion, with the recent buffs to sarkic over the past few weeks id rather hold off on on this and consider it in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted December 23, 2021 Share Posted December 23, 2021 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts