Domo775 Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 -support kinda seems petty you left out the fact he was supplier i’ve probably killed you more then once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgnisNuts Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 4 hours ago, Cloaker said: -Support While "Technically" this is violating the MOTD, You shouldn't only view something from a technical stand point. If we look at this rule, why do you think it was created? I assume the rule was created so Class-D don't spawn props in combat zones and so they don't abuse props. (ex: Spawning blast doors in Upper D-Block) With the information in mind on why this rule was created, do you think it is fair for Thin to be warned for trying to enhance an RP situation out of combat? After all lets not forget the reason we're able to spawn props in the first place. If Thin is not a donator rank and is using donator privileges off duty that is something that should be dealt with in the Staff Team, not something he should be warned for. Not to mention if you brought it up with him, he sounds like he would've been more than willing to delete some props. CI CMDRCC: CI Requiem Squad XH-76 Biggest DMC Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DumpTruck Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 4 hours ago, Cloaker said: -Support While "Technically" this is violating the MOTD, You shouldn't only view something from a technical stand point. If we look at this rule, why do you think it was created? I assume the rule was created so Class-D don't spawn props in combat zones and so they don't abuse props. (ex: Spawning blast doors in Upper D-Block) With the information in mind on why this rule was created, do you think it is fair for Thin to be warned for trying to enhance an RP situation out of combat? After all lets not forget the reason we're able to spawn props in the first place. If Thin is not a donator rank and is using donator privileges off duty that is something that should be dealt with in the Staff Team, not something he should be warned for. Former RRH Analyst X-ray 39 Former D1 Deimos I Former DDOP of RnD [CC's] Deadshot-Engineer-Snoop Dog-MTF-Alpha-9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pills Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 4 hours ago, Cloaker said: -Support While "Technically" this is violating the MOTD, You shouldn't only view something from a technical stand point. If we look at this rule, why do you think it was created? I assume the rule was created so Class-D don't spawn props in combat zones and so they don't abuse props. (ex: Spawning blast doors in Upper D-Block) With the information in mind on why this rule was created, do you think it is fair for Thin to be warned for trying to enhance an RP situation out of combat? After all lets not forget the reason we're able to spawn props in the first place. If Thin is not a donator rank and is using donator privileges off duty that is something that should be dealt with in the Staff Team, not something he should be warned for. Former: 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boekhom Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 -Support I always build femboy hooters and noone really complains, long as it aint fuckin with rp leave the mans alone 1 1 Chad of many names Professional Shit talker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Average Pipebomb enjoyer Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 (edited) -Support Why would he get warned for setting up a shop and he is trying to enhance a RP scenario and as for building off duty i have a ULX donor rank i build while I'm not staff are you going to make a player report on me next for "building while not on the staff job and trying to enhance a RP scenario on dclass supplier" Edited July 26, 2021 by russianweeb69 E11 2LT || Ex CI 2LT || Average Metal gear rising enjoyer || Ex Nu7 2LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toasterr Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 -Support Thin ain't do nothing bad, and it was for RP, if it was just prop minge then it would be a different story, but it looks like your just trying to ruin the fun 1 1 removed ci general toaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piller Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 7 hours ago, Loaff said: By "HoS" he means Rookieblue, the Head of Staff, not the Head of Security. As for my actual opinion on this, it seems completely harmless and while yes, it does break the rules of d class spawning props, why did you not just ask them to despawn the props? Why go through the trouble of a forums report? Forgive me but the whole report seems rather pedantic. Pretty much this. 7 hours ago, Loaff said: By "HoS" he means Rookieblue, the Head of Staff, not the Head of Security. As for my actual opinion on this, it seems completely harmless and while yes, it does break the rules of d class spawning props, why did you not just ask them to despawn the props? Why go through the trouble of a forums report? Forgive me but the whole report seems rather pedantic. Pretty much this. SCP-RP Head of Staff | Ethics Committee Chairman Former Nu-7 VCMDR l Former GenSec CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gaming Goat Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 2 hours ago, russianweeb69 said: -Support Why would he get warned for setting up a shop and he is trying to enhance a RP scenario and as for building off duty i have a ULX donor rank i build while I'm not staff are you going to make a player report on me next for "building while not on the staff job and trying to enhance a RP scenario on dclass supplier" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamikzone Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 The image does not show much of what was going on in the scene. The player was on D Class Supplier and alot of other players were in the area having fun RP. I don't see any reason to warn this player for something like this. If it was an issue a staff member could have quickly handled the situation and removed the props. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamikzone Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 Denied Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts