Dang Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 (edited) What are you suggesting? - Currently the rules for E11 entering site are "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange" I want this changed so there can be more RP Reasons for E11 to be requested onto site because for a example currently E11 cannot be requested onto the site if there are no Nu7 online which i think makes no sense, An understaffed site should be a RP reason for E11 to be allowed on Site. The new rules should be "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the condition orange being raised to orange or the site has less than 5 active Nu7s during self breaching hours." How would this change better the server? - It would keep the site more secure and would benefit all RP branches within the site. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - E11 will be in the Site a bit more often so that can effect CI slightly. Who would this change mostly benefit? - E11 and everybody in the site. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - Edited June 19, 2021 by Dang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Talos Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +support I Thought you al ready had the perms smh Best Regards From The Middle East CI General The Middle Eastern Prince The Last Oil Bender Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexxxx Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +Support Makes Sense tbh O5 Former: DT CPT , CGO - Tenn Graneet , 31st VCMDR -> Havoc CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamersquadman Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +Support This was being done since ive been in E11 and did not know that we couldnt enter due to understaff issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botez Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +support true idk im 2LT ok bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M8VP ツ Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +Support Cheeky blud Retired CI LTCMDR | Proud Enuzer | Roblox Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sprink Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 2 minutes ago, M8VP ツ said: +Support Cheeky blud Deputy Head of Security | Executive Event Team | Admin | Forum Diplomat | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rektify Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 Understaffing is a broad term. We could have 7 Nu7 on and they could consider it understaffed. To make it a little more specific, under where it says "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange.", we should add the condition: - If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours. This keeps a certain balance that would be fitting for roleplayers and fairness sake. If this is added, then you have my +Support This number can change depending on other's opnions. 1 ~Your Local SCP Lead Admin~ Aka: Rekti-HighThe REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack S Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 20 minutes ago, Rektify said: Understaffing is a broad term. We could have 7 Nu7 on and they could consider it understaffed. To make it a little more specific, under where it says "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange.", we should add the condition: - If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours. This keeps a certain balance that would be fitting for roleplayers and fairness sake. If this is added, then you have my +Support This number can change depending on other's opnions. This should also not count Nu7 that have AFK in their name. 1 Retired DHOS || Former Wardens Comissioner Caligula || Former SRIC in R&D || Former OH8 Funni [Redacted] Man | | Retired OPSV in Maintenance || Former MMF Duck || Former HLPR Bot AC3 || Retired 2LT in E-11 || Former Head Field Scout || Former Ranger Pax || former ET || Former Omicron-9 CPT || Former OM9 EXP Delta | PoliceRP: PD LCPL | SCU LT "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. " -John F Kennedy, Rice University, Sept. 12, 1962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayaya Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +Support This may just be a problem for me but it can be quite annoying when a Euclid SCP is out for hours and no Nu-7 or Gensec are able to handle it. It would be amazing if E-11 could enter after a set amount of time of the SCP being breached (45min+) In RP this could be seen as Nu-7 losing control of the site and E-11 being needed to restore the site to the point where Nu-7 can handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dang Posted June 19, 2021 Author Share Posted June 19, 2021 56 minutes ago, [GL] loudyfam (Jack S) said: This should also not count Nu7 that have AFK in their name. I have added 5 Nu7 "Active". So that means AFK Nu7 wont be counted. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +Support I believe this should be implemented, as there will be certain circumstances in which no one is available to re-contain a SCP breached, while there are some E-11 online that are unable to enter the facility and re-contain said SCP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right Twix Bar Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 +Support Is a good idea. But my only question is: 1 hour ago, Rektify said: If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours 1 hour ago, Dang said: less than 5 active Nu7s during self breaching hours What is self breaching hours? I'd assume anytime there are 70+ players. But, it's never defined. So, for all I know, it could be a literal time period. This is with my year of experience to give me context. Imagine how it would be for someone with much less time on the server. Overall, I like the idea, but what "self breaching hours" is should be defined. 1 Current: None Former: Security Sergeant Major (and SFC), Director of Logistics, Alpha-1 Private First Class, CI Mil Private First Class (and E4 C6), Nu7 Lance Corporal, CI RnD Supervisory Agent (and EOI F3) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rektify Posted June 19, 2021 Share Posted June 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, Right Twix Bar said: +Support Is a good idea. But my only question is: What is self breaching hours? I'd assume anytime there are 70+ players. But, it's never defined. So, for all I know, it could be a literal time period. This is with my year of experience to give me context. Imagine how it would be for someone with much less time on the server. Overall, I like the idea, but what "self breaching hours" is should be defined. We define self breaching hours when there are 70+ players so your first assumption is correct. ~Your Local SCP Lead Admin~ Aka: Rekti-HighThe REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgnisNuts Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 6 hours ago, Alexxx said: +Support Makes Sense tbh CI CMDRCC: CI Requiem Squad XH-76 Biggest DMC Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloaker Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 +Support I believe this would positively impact the community and increase the activity of E11. local teenage father :3 Retired: ci ddop cloaker s1mp Ex Senior Moderator Ex Event Team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toasty Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 11 hours ago, Starstep said: +Support I believe this should be implemented, as there will be certain circumstances in which no one is available to re-contain a SCP breached, while there are some E-11 online that are unable to enter the facility and re-contain said SCP. + Support Former: O5-10 "The Mad General" / SCP-RP Head Admin / CI 2LT / Security CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 19 hours ago, Rektify said: Understaffing is a broad term. We could have 7 Nu7 on and they could consider it understaffed. To make it a little more specific, under where it says "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange.", we should add the condition: - If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours. This keeps a certain balance that would be fitting for roleplayers and fairness sake. If this is added, then you have my +Support This number can change depending on other's opnions. What this nerd said. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Slim Nova Posted June 20, 2021 Share Posted June 20, 2021 19 hours ago, Rektify said: Understaffing is a broad term. We could have 7 Nu7 on and they could consider it understaffed. To make it a little more specific, under where it says "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange.", we should add the condition: - If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours. This keeps a certain balance that would be fitting for roleplayers and fairness sake. If this is added, then you have my +Support This number can change depending on other's opnions. I agree. The picture explains what I am. [DATA EXPU-] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWNED Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 On 6/19/2021 at 4:33 PM, Rektify said: Understaffing is a broad term. We could have 7 Nu7 on and they could consider it understaffed. To make it a little more specific, under where it says "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange.", we should add the condition: - If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours. This keeps a certain balance that would be fitting for roleplayers and fairness sake. If this is added, then you have my +Support This number can change depending on other's opnions. Former E11 1LT/Head Ranger, Former Event Team/Staff Member| GENSEC SGT Foundation Chef <- me when the quiet guy in D-block begins to reach into his pocket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recon Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 + SUPPORT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fizz-y Soda Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 +support CI CMDR / CA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guinea Pig Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 +. Support huh [SCP-RP] Retired E-11 COL, HFTO and D4 Head | Former CI MSGT/2LT | Former Alpha-1 "Red-Right Hand" Guardian Delta-9 | Former Nu7 2LT/SM HSU Conscript | Former Om-9 2LT and EXP Seasoned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noah Lee Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 On 6/19/2021 at 4:33 PM, Rektify said: Understaffing is a broad term. We could have 7 Nu7 on and they could consider it understaffed. To make it a little more specific, under where it says "A valid RP reason is one that could result in the Condition being raised to Orange.", we should add the condition: - If there are less than 5 Nu7s on during self breaching hours. This keeps a certain balance that would be fitting for roleplayers and fairness sake. If this is added, then you have my +Support This number can change depending on other's opnions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gaming Goat Posted June 22, 2021 Share Posted June 22, 2021 On 6/19/2021 at 4:27 PM, Alexxx said: +Support Makes Sense tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts