Jump to content

Hostage rule change - Denied


Wank

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? - Criminals should no longer be allowed to keep someone hostage in public when they are outnumbered by gov. 

Why should we add it? - I feel like criminals have too much power when they have a hostage. In many instances, people have a hostage in public, get surrounded and outnumbered by gov and yet still manage to drive away with the hostage. I am not asking that you add this restriction for hostages inside buildings where the criminal can not be surrounded. But, I feel if gov. can surround someone taking a hostage, they should not be able to continue that kidnapping. 

What are the advantages of having this? - Adding this would make it much easier for gov. to counter kidnappings. This would really improve role play on the server and make kidnapping a much harder task.

Who is it mainly for? - Government and people that don't want to be kidnapped.

Links to any content -  N/A

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Support
If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. 

PoliceRP: Former PD LT.

ImperialRP: Starkiller, former 8th Brother, StarFighter Vice Marshall, 501st CPT, and Admin.

MilitaryRP: Captain Price, former USAF Lieutenant Colonel.
JVS:  Former Darth Vader

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head of Staff
8 hours ago, Dredgen said:

- Support
If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. 

 

ImperialRP SMT | Head of Staff       

Head Forums Diplomat

Former High Admiral | Former DT Commander | Former State LTCOL | Former SPRT Commander

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 hours ago, Dredgen said:

- Support
If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. 

I think That this rule is not needed.

   SPRT Staff SGT                           OG SGT                                          State MSTRSGT                                          

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, SupremeChow said:

-support

realistically a hostage taker would have a pistol to the skull of the hostage 

but gov can already sync awp shots to take down a hostage taker if they think they can with only 1 hostage taker

 

Ex PoliceRP- Senior Admin & Senior Event Team Ex Support | Ex Fourm DiplomatEX SWAT Commander | EX UMC Mercenary Leader Ex OG General

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Manager
22 hours ago, T Chicken said:

+SUPPORT
 

-It's very unrealistic for gov to not be able to do anything if they surround them

-This causes alot of in game/OOC arguments because of how weird the rule is right now & how people are trained, so this rule would be amazing

 

 

〖  PoliceRP Senior Management Team | Manager

〖  Lead Account Manager  〗

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

MAJOR -SUPPORT

The whole point of this rule is for government not to put you under fearRP while having a hostage. In the real world one shot would be the usual kill meaning the hostage would die if the cops coming at you with guns. No government wants the hostage to die. This post just makes it look like you want hostage situations to be easier and less roleplay.

Edited by "Bryan

Whether you think you can or you think you can’t, you’re right. - Henry Ford

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2020 at 4:51 PM, Dredgen said:

- Support
If Gov play it smart, they can drop the hostage taker easily, this new rule would be unneeded and would break roleplay. 

 

State Command | SPRT Commander | PoliceRP Super Admin SS Agent | FBI Agent | Umbrella Corp Member

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...