icee jay Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 What are you suggesting? - To change it where the new changes don't apply to combatants. In other words, make it where you can't be feared rp with your guns out if your a combatant. How would this change better the server? - Clear confusions. And making it where one poor soul from being jumped upon opening a normal door. Will also make it where people won't be accused of breaking fear rp when they try to initiate combat. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. Less people will be feared RP. Who would this change mostly benefit? - MTF/CI Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion -N\A note plz do not be mad at me for my opinion The old E11 CMDR Jay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixalgamer99 Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 See this rule added too stop people like Maynard from tuning around with a gun and saying you can’t fear rp me and I like the fact that the rule apply stop combatants it makes no sense that someone would start blasting in a 1 v 3 and the other reason that was suggested was so CI and MTF can actually interrogate combatants and removing combatants from the equation doesn’t actually make sense so huge -SUPPORT And combatants are supposed too always have their gun out so that would ruin the whole part of CI getting to interrogate combatants in the month or two I was in CI I only was able too interrogate one combatant because he put his weapon down during a trade and we killed his freind it should not be that way it should be that combatants are always ready for action Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Zeus Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 I don’t understand why people bring up Maynard. But yeah, the reason why it was implemented to actually do some RP with regards to capturing and interrogation rather than just shooting. I understand it can be annoying at times but it’s a good way to have better RP for both CI and Foundation -Support Former || SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin || Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 15 minutes ago, [GL] Zeus said: I don’t understand why people bring up Maynard. Because there were multiple incidents of Maynard characters doing that exact thing. Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kami- Amaterasu Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 -Support honestly I think this new Fear RP rule bring a light in being able to capture more or be captured all in the same manner. I feel as this way its more fair to the server as a whole. [SCP-RP] Retired: CI RND DHOR/RA/CIN, Engineer/OS, Omi9 Maj, SET. [IMP-RP] Previous: CMO Captain, SFL, Tank VCMDR Shock VCMDR GMVIII Officially Married to Mary 2/23/23 EMPRESS OF D-BLOCK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack (utility one) Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 -support I would wait a few weeks to give it a try. I honestly like the rules making turning a corner actually kinda worth a risk, making people actually GROUP up. If it doesn't work out then it can always be reversed. There are gods in Alabama: Jack Daniel's, high school quarterbacks, trucks, big tits, and also Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixalgamer99 Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 9 hours ago, [GL] Zeus said: I don’t understand why people bring up Maynard. But yeah, the reason why it was implemented to actually do some RP with regards to capturing and interrogation rather than just shooting. I understand it can be annoying at times but it’s a good way to have better RP for both CI and Foundation -Support Because when the suggestion was made they mentioned Maynard pulling out a ups-s and bhopping around while saying you can’t fear rp me I have a weapon out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Zeus Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, pixalgamer99 said: Because when the suggestion was made they mentioned Maynard pulling out a ups-s and bhopping around while saying you can’t fear rp me I have a weapon out They generally shouldn’t be running with weapons out. This would come off as suspicious. But yeah I get your point and I feel like it was kinda needed to increase RP with regards to captures and interrogations. -Support still stays, sorry for the double reply Edited August 22, 2020 by [GL] Zeus Former || SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin || Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixalgamer99 Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, [GL] Zeus said: They generally shouldn’t be running with weapons out. This would come off as suspicious. But yeah I get your point and I feel like it was kinda needed to increase RP with regards to captures and interrogations. -Support still stays, sorry for the double reply Just too clear it up he already had an AOS on him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
October Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 Okay, for those unaware, fearRP cannot be put in effect if combat has already started (meaning shots fired). The idea behind the rule for combatants is that if CI/MTF sneak up behind you then you wouldn’t, realistically, have time to turn around and shoot, and you should value your life. -support because you can shoot CI before they’re in fearRP range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadTimeInbound Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 (edited) -Support. The new system closes a lot of loopholes. Give it a chance. Edited August 22, 2020 by BadTimeInbound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted September 7, 2020 Share Posted September 7, 2020 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts