Jump to content

BadAim's Warn Appeal


BadAim

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Dang said:

- support 

- Me personally I would of just given a verbal warning as obviously the prop usage wasn't used for malicious intent and badaim was trying to help, however obviously you did break the MOTD so the warning is valid just a very harsh punishment for the situation. 

 

The United Kingdom, made up of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, is an island nation in north-western Europe. England – birthplace of Shakespeare and The Beatles – is home to the capital, London, a globally influential centre of finance and culture. England is also site of Neolithic Stonehenge, Bath’s Roman spa and centuries-old universities at Oxford and Cambridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Meridian said:

+Support, as long as he wasn't causing harm I feel like a warn is way too far, especially if he was trying to help.

 

Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin 
200.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support, while i agree that warns are at a staff members discretion, in this case i believe that Badaim was attempting to fix a problem and the way he was trying to fix it wouldn't have harmed anyone.

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2020 at 3:03 AM, [GL] Mike said:

 

It is staff's choice but I feel sparkle could've just said "Thanks for helpin but next time just call staff as Class-D aren't allowed to spawn props."

While yes , what bad aim did was technically against the rules, I believe the staff member could’ve handled this a bit better

Current : 
Former : Nu7 COL, HSU Founder (I wrote the SOP so I'm very important clearly), Nu7 MAJ x 2, E11 2LT, SCP Senior Mod, TTT SA, JvS Admin, TS Support 3,  HSU Commissar (💀), RRH Guardian 01
 default_8be418cb-c616-4f46-8ad7-5070b0e81aec_2.jpg.60c85fe9470c071c4e72b026f7a76494.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Falxen said:

+Support, while i agree that warns are at a staff members discretion, in this case i believe that Badaim was attempting to fix a problem and the way he was trying to fix it wouldn't have harmed anyone.

 

𝙍𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙂𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 | 𝙍𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙪𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙢𝙞𝙣 
sasuke GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accepted

Based on the evidence and testimony provided, this warning appeal is being accepted. While the appellate in this case broke a well known rule in the MOTD, some discretion in this case would be warranted. The elevator glitch is well known and well documented, and on the list to be fixed. However, the appellate could've easily called a staff member about the issue, or notified staff immediately upon spawning a prop to fix the glitch to avoid the situation. Additionally, the appellate failed to immediately remove his prop upon fixing the glitch, which led to the staff member in question discovering the situation and handling as they deemed appropriate.

To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff

March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...