GAM3 Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 Post name: Make door breaching/calling admin to open door OOC. What are you suggesting? - I want the server to make calling an admin to breach your door as an SCP (especially 682 OOC). How would this change better the server? - Well, I just think it would make it more fair for people who spend 20 minutes self-breaching. For example I breached my first door, Nu7 come in, start shooting me, they ask for my HP, they stop, I say please give me a minute to call an admin to breach my door for me. They instead say, no. To be fair in RP I would be able to do this without an admin. They took the advantage of an OOC action and I wish for this to be stated in the motd. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - No, it would be overall more fair. Who would this change mostly benefit? - The player of 682, if we don't have 682 players then SCP-682 would be without use. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - As you can see from this recording they used an OOC event to their advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack S Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 +/- Suppport I'd say at least advert you need feeding, they wont know when to feed you. But I have had issues with MTF Metagaming me as 035. So I would understand, but also you have to let MTF know to feed you. Retired DHOS || Former Wardens Comissioner Caligula || Former SRIC in R&D || Former OH8 Funni [Redacted] Man | | Retired OPSV in Maintenance || Former MMF Duck || Former HLPR Bot AC3 || Retired 2LT in E-11 || Former Head Field Scout || Former Ranger Pax || former ET || Former Omicron-9 CPT || Former OM9 EXP Delta | PoliceRP: PD LCPL | SCU LT "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. " -John F Kennedy, Rice University, Sept. 12, 1962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 (edited) Yeah staff will especially see it then. Edited August 14, 2020 by Neo SCP-RP Moderator | CI LTCOL Boozle LC32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 -Support, this would be making something which has very large in character effects OOC, which would cause more issue's then its worth. Certainly seeing as how i rarely see this being an issue for any SCP except 682. "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forehead man [GL] Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 -support ah yes ooc admin sits MTF E11 VCMDR Mateo C0RN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack (utility one) Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 -support Pretty hard to manage on staff and in character. There are gods in Alabama: Jack Daniel's, high school quarterbacks, trucks, big tits, and also Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mint Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Ok I will be striking Mike for his actions -support MTF Nu7 Major || E11 1LT || Old CI SGT || Ret.LeadResearcher || || RHO-36 Penumbra Squad || || Mikes Favorite Son || OH3 RRH || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Mike Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 17 minutes ago, Mint said: Ok I will be striking Mike for his actions -support Im so sorry Mint sir I wont do it again. It doesnt need OOC cause you only have to make the ticket and staff do the rest you dont have to be involved anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted August 16, 2020 Share Posted August 16, 2020 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts