Lifes suggestion - Denied

[Some Weeb]

What are you suggesting? -To increase the 2 lifes to three lives before you -support wait what I am saying is only 2 of your lives may be in CMD and one as a NCO/Enlisted depending on branches 

How would this change better the server? - Because people want to explore more branches while still holding the ones they love for me and example is I want to MTF but CI takes a  life and Security and I am only a Enlisted and NCO and that means I cant become a NCO in MTF what I am suggesting is yes you may only hold 2 CMD ranks but can be a NCO at MAX in a different branch.

Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Well you might have a little bit of a inflation in branches but that's kinda good!

Who would this change mostly benefit? - Everyone in the community of SCP RP  

Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion -N/a

[Catsro]

-Support this has been denied multiple times 

This was the previous time it was denied.

Having 3 lives has a extremely high chance of you neglecting a life.

[Mint]

-support reasons abuv

Edited August 14, 2020 by Mint

[Meridian]

+Support, means people could have more fun, if some lives do get neglected you just remove them, it's the player that takes the risk here as if they continuously risk a life it may result in that branch not wanting them in the future.

[Rektify]

1 hour ago, Catsro said:

-Support this has been denied multiple times 

This was the previous time it was denied.

Having 3 lives has a extremely high chance of you neglecting a life.

 

[Some Weeb]

Yeah but that's why I have a counter balance BY ONLY HAVING 2 LIFES AS CMD AND IT TO YOUR DISCRETION TO TAKE ON A 3RD

[Comrade Boekhom]

2 hours ago, Catsro said:

-Support this has been denied multiple times 

This was the previous time it was denied.

Having 3 lives has a extremely high chance of you neglecting a life.

 

[Some Weeb]

I see a lot say  someone can't handle 3 that's why its OPTIONAL

[Phillers]

13 minutes ago, Dragin said:

I see a lot say  someone can't handle 3 that's why its OPTIONAL

a 2nd life is also already optional, but thats the issue here, someone will take 3 lives and end up having to juggle 3, fail at that, and make it harder for branch HCMD.

[Rangiatea]

14 minutes ago, Dragin said:

I see a lot say  someone can't handle 3 that's why its OPTIONAL

That doesnt stop people, if its optional most people will still take it also

most of the branches at this point has it so that your rank doesnt count as a life until (insert rank here)

[Some Weeb]

Yeah but a lot of them it's like PVT or RCT Is an life 

[Jack (utility one)]

I understand why the rule is in place. If I had 3 lives to say, I can be command in all 3 MTF branches, that gives you a decent amount to say, espacially if your HCMD in one of those branches, almost enough power of the DoTF. I can see that being a major issue espacially if they aren't ready or deserving of that kind of power. But and a big BUT, I believe every branch shouldn't cost a life at the beginning, like the starting rank or 2. It would boost activity in all branches and people don't have to leave one they enjoy to take a gamble on a new branch that they may or may not like.

[[GL] Zeus]

-Support
Has been denied multiple times

[Jack S]

+Support

I like the idea, but sadly it's been denied before.

[FeaR x Green Pikachu]

I mean i dont find anything wrong with 1 command life and 2 non command lifes because well some times having 2 command lifes and 1 non might still be a hand full so i suggest turning it around 
+/-support

Edited August 14, 2020 by FeaR x Green Pikachu

[Skela]

-Support. 
for the various reasons above given by Catsro this wouldn’t work out well.

If “three lives” was a thing, the whole balance of the server will be off. People can be in 3 branches, which means they’re taking 3 slots. Especially if you wanna play as an Enlisted. Let’s put it this way. You can only be high command in one branch, and low command in another. (Or have 2 lowcommand lives.) If this 3rd life rule thing comes into play, if the person works hard enough and is a SGM (or the highest non command rank) they’re stuck on that spot until they’re removed, or until they decide they want to command and drop a life. That is completely blocking the path for people who actually wanna move up. Either way it’s going to clutter and make a huge mess. And I doubt people can balance 3 lives. Especially with the amount responsibilities command have to do everyday.

[Ritz]

10 hours ago, Skela said:

-Support. 
for the various reasons above given by Catsro this wouldn’t work out well.

If “three lives” was a thing, the whole balance of the server will be off. People can be in 3 branches, which means they’re taking 3 slots. Especially if you wanna play as an Enlisted. Let’s put it this way. You can only be high command in one branch, and low command in another. (Or have 2 lowcommand lives.) If this 3rd life rule thing comes into play, if the person works hard enough and is a SGM (or the highest non command rank) they’re stuck on that spot until they’re removed, or until they decide they want to command and drop a life. That is completely blocking the path for people who actually wanna move up. Either way it’s going to clutter and make a huge mess. And I doubt people can balance 3 lives. Especially with the amount responsibilities command have to do everyday.

Lifes

we did it fellas

we can have more lifes

im happy that our lifes has been increased

Edited August 15, 2020 by Ritz

[Jack II]

When i got CMD in security and was a LR and RFA in research, i got a lot less active on research. Itd be insanely annoying to manage 3 lives

[icee jay]

-support For the ones filling out 2 lives they can tell you how much of a hassle it can to spiting time as it is adding a 3rd will just make people  go inactive in one branch.

[Gunther]

14 hours ago, Dragin said:

I see a lot say  someone can't handle 3 that's why its OPTIONAL

This but also this:

 

16 hours ago, Catsro said:

-Support this has been denied multiple times 

This was the previous time it was denied.

Having 3 lives has a extremely high chance of you neglecting a life.

 

[Cogs]

8 hours ago, Skela said:

-Support. 
for the various reasons above given by Catsro this wouldn’t work out well.

If “three lives” was a thing, the whole balance of the server will be off. People can be in 3 branches, which means they’re taking 3 slots. Especially if you wanna play as an Enlisted. Let’s put it this way. You can only be high command in one branch, and low command in another. (Or have 2 lowcommand lives.) If this 3rd life rule thing comes into play, if the person works hard enough and is a SGM (or the highest non command rank) they’re stuck on that spot until they’re removed, or until they decide they want to command and drop a life. That is completely blocking the path for people who actually wanna move up. Either way it’s going to clutter and make a huge mess. And I doubt people can balance 3 lives. Especially with the amount responsibilities command have to do everyday.

this also can really mess up Staff & ET members who are can be cocky about their management skills, and can cause a large amount of stress

[Sixx]

23 hours ago, Catsro said:

-Support this has been denied multiple times 

This was the previous time it was denied.

Having 3 lives has a extremely high chance of you neglecting a life.

 

[pixalgamer99]

I don’t think you should have three lives because of the fact of neglect if you have 3 you will most likely neglect one of your lives too counter that I think it should be that every branch at least has the first rank be not a life so if your in 2 MTF branch’s but want too try out CI but arnt a donator you don’t have too leave a branch you just have too escape an example of neglect is seeing the amount of people in the utility branch’s now some of those you see very active like me or Trick or Zack or Jack or borealis or Rock or Damien (those are some people I can name off the top of my head) those are very active people but if you see the roster a lot of people are not active and it could most likely be because since it’s not a life they don’t need too get rid of it so we have a lot of filled up roster slots with people who are never on sure some of them can’t get on but it’s a lot of people who can and don’t because it’s not a life and they don’t have too care about it so I gotta give this a huge -SUPPORT

[Sinnik]

On 8/14/2020 at 2:58 AM, Catsro said:

-Support this has been denied multiple times 

This was the previous time it was denied.

Having 3 lives has a extremely high chance of you neglecting a life.

However, I do think that perhaps, instead of an extra life, branches could perhaps reevaluate *when* their branch counts as a life. For example, if, say, gensec counted as a life at CPL instead of LCPL, or Nu7 counted as a life at LCPL maybe. I think that would allow people to get a taste for what that branch is like without having to worry about hitting their life limit.

[Igneous]

Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.