Propane Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 What are you suggesting? - When 966 uncloak to attack someone, unless they already have thermals on, they can't advert 966 breach and shoot them without thermals on. Instead, they can say they are being randomly slashed, then MTF/CI/Gensec Command can advert thermals. How would this change better the server? - Make 966 actually possible to kill someone solo without being called out. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - People will probably be annoued Who would this change mostly benefit? - 966 Players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Zeus Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 -Support It just makes it more confusing and annoying for players to deal with 966 with already has a SWEP with good Hitreg Former || SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin || Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verycrankyredhead Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 Just now, [GL] Zeus said: -Support It just makes it more confusing and annoying for players to deal with 966 with already has a SWEP with good Hitreg id +support if you could have 2 sweps one that can cloak when your attacking and one non cloak attacking after people say themals which would be pretty cool Retired Research Low Command Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matricies Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 (edited) Hello Propane, This would require a rule change as you are currently not allowed to attack people while invisible. This would also not serve any purpose at all, as getting attacked would let you call 966 breach anyways because 966 is the ONLY thing that would be able to attack and still be considered "invisible" unless you made it so that CI Infil/MTF stealth units could do it too which would be nightmarish. Because of the reasons above, this gets a -support from me. It wouldn't really change much because getting attacked out of no where is still a call for thermals/966 breach in this situation, which would cause the 966 to have to decloak anyways. Edited July 27, 2020 by Matricies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack (utility one) Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 -support Would be to confusing and would ultimately void the purpose of it. There are gods in Alabama: Jack Daniel's, high school quarterbacks, trucks, big tits, and also Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rektify Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Matricies said: Hello Propane, This would require a rule change as you are currently not allowed to attack people while invisible. This would also not serve any purpose at all, as getting attacked would let you call 966 breach anyways because 966 is the ONLY thing that would be able to attack and still be considered "invisible" unless you made it so that CI Infil/MTF stealth units could do it too which would be nightmarish. Because of the reasons above, this gets a -support from me. It wouldn't really change much because getting attacked out of no where is still a call for thermals/966 breach in this situation, which would cause the 966 to have to decloak anyways. ~Your Local SCP Lead Admin~ Aka: Rekti-HighThe REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 -Support, this'd overcomplicate matters. "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 3 hours ago, Falxen said: -Support, this'd overcomplicate matters. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixalgamer99 Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 I would like a sweep that let him attack and be invisible but if someone called it out you would use the claws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixx Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 21 hours ago, [GL] Zeus said: -Support It just makes it more confusing and annoying for players to deal with 966 with already has a SWEP with good Hitreg [ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted August 16, 2020 Share Posted August 16, 2020 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts