Jump to content

966 being spotted - Denied


Propane

Recommended Posts

What are you suggesting? - When 966 uncloak to attack someone, unless they already have thermals on, they can't advert 966 breach and shoot them without thermals on. Instead, they can say they are being randomly slashed, then MTF/CI/Gensec Command can advert thermals.

How would this change better the server? - Make 966 actually possible to kill someone solo without being called out.

Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - People will probably be annoued

Who would this change mostly benefit? - 966 Players 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support 
It just makes it more confusing and annoying for players to deal with 966 with already has a SWEP with good Hitreg

Former
|| 
SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin ||  Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, [GL] Zeus said:

-Support 
It just makes it more confusing and annoying for players to deal with 966 with already has a SWEP with good Hitreg

id +support if you could have 2 sweps one that can cloak when your attacking and one non cloak attacking after people say themals which would be pretty cool

                                             Retired Research Low Command

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Propane,

This would require a rule change as you are currently not allowed to attack people while invisible. This would also not serve any purpose at all, as getting attacked would let you call 966 breach anyways because 966 is the ONLY thing that would be able to attack and still be considered "invisible" unless you made it so that CI Infil/MTF stealth units could do it too which would be nightmarish.

Because of the reasons above, this gets a -support from me. It wouldn't really change much because getting attacked out of no where is still a call for thermals/966 breach in this situation, which would cause the 966 to have to decloak anyways.
 

Edited by Matricies
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matricies said:

Hello Propane,

This would require a rule change as you are currently not allowed to attack people while invisible. This would also not serve any purpose at all, as getting attacked would let you call 966 breach anyways because 966 is the ONLY thing that would be able to attack and still be considered "invisible" unless you made it so that CI Infil/MTF stealth units could do it too which would be nightmarish.

Because of the reasons above, this gets a -support from me. It wouldn't really change much because getting attacked out of no where is still a call for thermals/966 breach in this situation, which would cause the 966 to have to decloak anyways.
 

 

~Your Local SCP Lead AdminAka: Rekti-High
The REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support, this'd overcomplicate matters.

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, [GL] Zeus said:

-Support 
It just makes it more confusing and annoying for players to deal with 966 with already has a SWEP with good Hitreg

 

[ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...