Jack (utility one) Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 (edited) What are you suggesting? - I am suggesting that a non-combatant RoE is added to the rules under foundation staff. The rule I am requesting is that "Non-combatants (research, utility) are only able to shoot an enemy if shot upon, hit, attacked in any form or fashion as well as being cuffed, or threatened by a weapon (while not under fearRP)." How would this change better the server? - This is the rule of thumb around non-combatants that only shoot if shot at but I've also been told and taught that you can attack if you feel threatened. That rule is extremely broad and makes things confusing towards CI and D-class. What is the border of feeling threatened or not, how can you staff that issue if all the player has to say is "I felt threatened." and the person gets off scot free. This would also add this rule "only shoot if shot at." in the MOTD it self instead word to word or branch rules and would make things a lot simpler. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - I don't see any besides making RDM harder as it removes this excuse. (this is for those RDM'ers out there) Who would this change mostly benefit? - non-combatants, CI, D-class or any other "enemies" Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - nope. Edited August 11, 2020 by Jack (utility one) There are gods in Alabama: Jack Daniel's, high school quarterbacks, trucks, big tits, and also Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hope Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 +support The current rules of RoE is extremely broad, would really like it updated to the current standards. osu! achiever? I don't know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritz Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 +Support clarity is a never nice thing to have in an MOTD Was Nu7 2LT Shot Once Was a Nu7 MSGT also was a CI Captain once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boekhom Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Hope said: +support The current rules of RoE is extremely broad, would really like it updated to the current standards. Chad of many names Professional Shit talker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J0LT Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Hope said: +support The current rules of RoE is extremely broad, would really like it updated to the current standards. Retired Nu7 CMDR & CI LTCOL/MAJ Senior Admin/Forums dip/Support Supervisor | former the following: HTF/E4 Head | Only Anubis award winner | Former Nu7 HFTO and CI OFTO | Sec MSGT+Pertinax Owns: Omi-9 'Last Remnants' | Farmer Tucker | Farmer Darius XII | Reznov Klushie | Foxx On: Alpha-8 | S.T.A.R.S | Iota-13 'Luxxy's Soldiers' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bionicle Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Ritz said: +Support clarity is a nice thing to have in an MOTD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rektify Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 +Support Sure. ~Your Local SCP Lead Admin~ Aka: Rekti-HighThe REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadTimeInbound Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 +Support. Half of the suggestions around here are just adding clarity. Maybe someone should make just an overall rewrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sogieeeeeee Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 7 hours ago, Ritz said: +Support clarity is a never nice thing to have in an MOTD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lefty Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 12 hours ago, Hope said: +support The current rules of RoE is extremely broad, would really like it updated to the current standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OWNED Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 + support " he looked at me funny, so I killed him" Former E11 1LT/Head Ranger, Former Event Team/Staff Member| GENSEC SGT Foundation Chef <- me when the quiet guy in D-block begins to reach into his pocket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forehead man [GL] Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 +/- support - while I see the reason to add this so people dont just do " he looked at me funny", if you see ci coming up to you about to cuff your ass, you bet your ass you would try to shoot them regardless if they shot you MTF E11 VCMDR Mateo C0RN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 +Support Simple and easy to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 2 hours ago, Sparkle said: +Support Simple and easy to understand. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggo0 Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 10 hours ago, Forehead man [GL] said: +/- support - while I see the reason to add this so people dont just do " he looked at me funny", if you see ci coming up to you about to cuff your ass, you bet your ass you would try to shoot them regardless if they shot you This happened to me before, they tried to cuff me so I just pulled out a shotgun. I think there should be exceptions. SCPRP Director of Logistics, Event Team | Former Nu7 2LT, Former Senior Admin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack (utility one) Posted July 12, 2020 Author Share Posted July 12, 2020 I would say an acception to CI but sometimes they don't shoot and they will complain. I'm trying to avoid complaints and arguments, I will add being cuffed as a reason to attack...but I feel the reasons I said would cover that but I will add it. There are gods in Alabama: Jack Daniel's, high school quarterbacks, trucks, big tits, and also Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAKPV Posted July 12, 2020 Share Posted July 12, 2020 On 7/11/2020 at 12:15 PM, Hope said: +support The current rules of RoE is extremely broad, would really like it updated to the current standards. EX MTF Omi9 RCT WAK RC22 | MTF Nu7 CPL WAK O07C | MTF E11 PFC WAK | Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manager Curtis Posted July 14, 2020 Manager Share Posted July 14, 2020 +Support I like the idea, and I think it can stop a lot of confusion and frustration. “Be the change that you wish to see in the world.” ― Mahatma Gandhi Retired Director of Intelligence(2023) & Former Epsilon-11 Commander (2020/2023) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M8VP ツ Posted August 11, 2020 Share Posted August 11, 2020 On 7/12/2020 at 12:10 AM, Sparkle said: +Support Simple and easy to understand. Retired CI LTCMDR | Proud Enuzer | Roblox Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boekhom Posted August 11, 2020 Share Posted August 11, 2020 On 7/11/2020 at 1:15 PM, Hope said: +support The current rules of RoE is extremely broad, would really like it updated to the current standards. Chad of many names Professional Shit talker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
October Posted August 11, 2020 Share Posted August 11, 2020 On 7/12/2020 at 3:41 PM, Jack (utility one) said: I would say an acception to CI but sometimes they don't shoot and they will complain. I'm trying to avoid complaints and arguments, I will add being cuffed as a reason to attack...but I feel the reasons I said would cover that but I will add it. The best system, in my opinion, is that if you aren’t under fearRP and someone is threatening you with a weapon (ie a d-class with a knife saying “open this door or I’ll stab you!”) would qualify as a threat. So the rule should be, being shot at, cuffed, or threatened by a weapon (while not under fearRP). Otherwise I’d say +support 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack (utility one) Posted August 11, 2020 Author Share Posted August 11, 2020 9 hours ago, October said: or threatened by a weapon (while not under fearRP) added! There are gods in Alabama: Jack Daniel's, high school quarterbacks, trucks, big tits, and also Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakota Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 On 7/11/2020 at 10:49 AM, Ritz said: +Support clarity is a never nice thing to have in an MOTD Current: [REDACTED] Former: E11 COL | Deputy Head of FTOs | CI SRIC/LCPL "We die in the dark so that others can live in the light." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icee jay Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 +support But not if u mean if some ones running in your direction with a gun out you will shoot them thats ridiculous. The old E11 CMDR Jay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted August 16, 2020 Share Posted August 16, 2020 @Rookieblue When you have a second! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts