Ritz Posted June 23, 2020 Share Posted June 23, 2020 3 hours ago, CanOBeanz said: -Support Tbh this needs to be clarified in MOTD; It looks like Orange was making an honest effort to play the SCP correctly within the established rules, as evidenced by the clear audible counting for everyone present to hear. The main conflict point here is the interpretation of when exactly the swep is supposed to be unequipped while being extinguished. Some people are saying the SWEP must be unequipped while being sprayed, but this is in fact not listed as a rule, so I can see how any player might think that the swep gets unequipped at the end of the 10 second spray time instead of during the 10 second spray time. Was Nu7 2LT Shot Once Was a Nu7 MSGT also was a CI Captain once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Posted June 23, 2020 Share Posted June 23, 2020 -Support From the way I am perceiving this, I do not believe that a punishment should be handed out, but rather the MOTD should be cleared up to cause less confusion and problems. Adding on to that, there was truly no attempt to break any of the rules, therefore I believe that no punishment should be given out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixx Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 4 hours ago, Starstep said: -Support From the way I am perceiving this, I do not believe that a punishment should be handed out, but rather the MOTD should be cleared up to cause less confusion and problems. Adding on to that, there was truly no attempt to break any of the rules, therefore I believe that no punishment should be given out. I was there when it happened and i agree with this ^ [ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkle Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 5 hours ago, Starstep said: -Support From the way I am perceiving this, I do not believe that a punishment should be handed out, but rather the MOTD should be cleared up to cause less confusion and problems. Adding on to that, there was truly no attempt to break any of the rules, therefore I believe that no punishment should be given out. I agree with this fully. There was no real intent to break the rules at the moment. We are at this stage because it was "generally accepted" by the community that 3 extinguishers on you means fire goes off and everyone walks back. However, the current rules do not reflect being that the wording signifies that you are "required to hold your SWEP at all times outside of your containment cell" and should be "retreating away from the fire extinguisher." I believe the next step should be making the suggestion to make the necessary changes. -Support for any punishment. He already received the verbal for the incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Mike Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 19 hours ago, CanOBeanz said: -Support Tbh this needs to be clarified in MOTD; It looks like Orange was making an honest effort to play the SCP correctly within the established rules, as evidenced by the clear audible counting for everyone present to hear. The main conflict point here is the interpretation of when exactly the swep is supposed to be unequipped while being extinguished. Some people are saying the SWEP must be unequipped while being sprayed, but this is in fact not listed as a rule, so I can see how any player might think that the swep gets unequipped at the end of the 10 second spray time instead of during the 10 second spray time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Propane Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 -support No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rookieblue Posted June 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted June 25, 2020 Partially Accepted Based on the information and evidence provided, the following actions will be taken: 1) I will update and clarify SCP 457 rules. SCP 457 is very rarely played as many people have pointed out, and these types of issues haven't been run into before/often, so we didn't know there was a problem with the rules. Moving forward on the next MOTD update, the following will be added to SCP 457's rules: - To be recontained, SCP-457 needs to be extinguished with a fire extinguisher. If 457 is sprayed by one or two fire extinguishers it will retreat from the area. If 457 is sprayed with three or more fire extinguishers it is extinguished immediately. At this point 457 can be safely cuffed and returned to its cell. 2) Due to the vagueness of the rule, the player in this case will be educated about the upcoming rule change moving forward. 3) Additionally, this incident was already handled in game by a staff member. Player reports are to be used for incidents that are not handled in game by staff. If you disagree with a decision made by a staff member, a staff report is the proper medium to air this grievance. 7 Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts