Jump to content

MOTD Clarification - Denied


Propane

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? - MOTD Clarification on whether or not people can hold checkpoints or not

Why should we add it? - Some staff have different opinions on this and I feel like there should be a clear rule 

What are the advantages of having this? - Clear up confusion 

Who is it mainly for? - CI/D-Class/Staff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry what do you mean by holding checkpoints?

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support, for the negative. forcefully keeping doors which have timers on them open should be FailRP IMO.

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Falxen said:

+Support, for the negative. forcefully keeping doors which have timers on them open should be FailRP IMO.

Yea. Especially on those as they are hydraulics and would crush a person. 

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Falxen said:

+Support, for the negative. forcefully keeping doors which have timers on them open should be FailRP IMO.

-/+Support for reasons above, but at the same time all of Gensec, MTF, D-Class, and CI, and probably other branches have done this for so long, probably longer than I've been playing, so it seems a little unnecessary to start making something like this FailRP when its been done for so long without any issues or complaints. 

Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin 
200.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Falxen said:

+Support, for the negative. forcefully keeping doors which have timers on them open should be FailRP IMO.

 

[SCP-RP]   Retired Head Of Security   ||   Retired Field Work Manager   ||   Retired OM3   ||   Retired Event Team Member

[JvS no more]   Former FIRST The Grand Inquisitor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Falxen said:

+Support, for the negative. forcefully keeping doors which have timers on them open should be FailRP IMO.

Yeah, that is Exploiting if people do this, but it should be clarified.

"Pay increase declined. Welcome to the Foundation, get used to it." -O5-6

3rd time Head of Medical Staff Ex-Director of Research and Security Ex-Director of Utility | Ex-Senior Admin for SCP-RP |  Ex-Admin for TTT 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/5/2020 at 6:15 AM, Gunther said:

all of Gensec, MTF, D-Class, and CI, and probably other branches have done this for so long, probably longer than I've been playing, so it seems a little unnecessary to start making something like this FailRP when its been done for so long without any issues or complaints. 

 

big cat running GIF

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...