Jump to content

Job Addition: The Level 55 Elite Tech Class - Accepted


CanOBeanz

Recommended Posts

The only reason why we have these combat classes is because you fail to do your job and we have to help you. JK but seriously our normal classes are not combat based, obviously, and most times we are attacked by CI and D-class, and MTF fail constantly to give technicians escorts into HCZ to fix SCP cells. This helps out MTF and giving them 1 less thing to  focus on. Also we go into battle because we are a little more battle quipped then main security classes, mainly ACM, and they are there for purely helping out security and MTF and heals yall on the field so you don't have to go to medbay, so security and MTF should be the last people complaining about this since this helps y'all out to.

   ●•۩۞۩[̲̅Ɠ̲̅є̲̅т̲̲̅̅۰̲̅я̲̲̅є̲̅̅к̲̅т̲̲̲̲̅̅̅̅]۩۞۩•●

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, October said:

It’s a 175/175 class compared to delta which is 175/160. While delta does have the sawed off, the AR that MMF has is better than Delta’s AR. 

Its a 175/100 Class, and it has a Aug A3, which for the record, is significantly worse.

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Gunther said:

I don't mean branch diss when I say this, this is based off what I observe, but I feel Utility and Research really do be doing that. SCPs or CI roam the halls of LCZ, or even when Gensec is outside D-Block during Riot Protocol, I feel like Util/Research really like to put themselves into the middle of the action or ignore any threats that currently go on. I've already brought this up with their High Command but its still an issue. This type of job would only make that impression worse.

Well, our SOPs are written to not be so restrictive that they keep utility players in their bunks or a panic room every time a threat appears in LCZ-- Otherwise they'd be stuck inside all the time with how frequently these things happen in lcz. We tried this before with not allowing any utility to be out during Defcon 3 unless escorted by higher ranks, and there were considerable complaints.

If you believe Utility is getting in the way of Security doing their job in some way, then that's something i'd be interested in hearing about so we can work on addressing the situation together-- preferably via DMs.

 

In the meantime, this new job is merely intended to take some of the pressure off of MTF for escorting technicians, give technical a cool level 55+ job like the other utility branches, and also be a way for more people to get to play on an interesting robot job for RP. There's no intent to further drive utility towards PVP involvement with this addition (it's a self defense job just like technicians are), and the job can always be changed or nerfed or whatever if there are issues with it in use 🙂 

Edited by CanOBeanz

O5-9: "Misfortune"  A.K.A.  "Mr. Unlucky"

"Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!"

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CanOBeanz said:

In the meantime, this new job is merely intended to take some of the pressure off of MTF for escorting technicians, give technical a cool level 55+ job like the other utility branches, and also be a way for more people to get to play on an interesting robot job for RP. There's no intent to further drive utility towards PVP involvement with this addition (it's a self defense job just like technicians are), and the job can always be changed or nerfed or whatever if there are issues with it in use 

I will say I like how Technical is attempting to build around the idea of HLPR bot and recognizing it as a part of the branch, whereas most CC's are just seen as, well, CC's. It would be the difference between, say for example, Legion being an MTF CC, and Legion being recognized as a part of the branch and given an RP reason for co-existing with the branch.

  • Like 1

Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin 
200.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Kami- Amaterasu said:

+/- Support
 

+Seems like an interesting class to see around
 

+Would allow Tech to get their level Class

 

-I feel if Utility keep getting these combatant classes it'll be impossible for CI to raid LCZ- MTF is already loosing their activity, feels like their job is getting filled by Utility with these combatant classes. I understand fighting D class but allowing them to combat CI seems a bit farfetch. Especially with the balance issue of the whole Alpha being lower than this class

If CI can hack them like the CC, I’m fine with it.

Edited by Bionicle
  • Heart-Eyes 1

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fool said:

+Support

Very interesting, I think this would make a great addition to Technical.

 

Former
|| 
SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin ||  Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Falxen said:

+Support! Technical should also have their Leveled Class, and this is a great way of implementing it!

 

                                                      192412312_screenshot_2020-02-26_at_9-24-(1).png.43e614bc17bbf87004d3acba288c52df.png
                                                                             Chad of many names       Professional Shit talker

                                                                                       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bionicle said:

If CI can hack them like the CC, I’m fine with it.

That would be a cool addition to it that would increase the rp capabilities of the class

  • Like 1

Was Nu7 2LT

Shot Once

Was a Nu7 MSGT

also was a CI Captain once

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2020 at 2:13 PM, October said:

 

I’m personally against utility having these faux MTF jobs. MMF is better than the CI Delta job and it’s stupid, in my opinion, because utility shouldn’t be trying to design itself as an MTF branch. Though, it’s up to SMT and the branch heads and if this is what they want then let them have it I guess. 

Couldn't have said it better.

23 hours ago, CanOBeanz said:

Just to clarify, this is intended to be a 'self-defense' rules-of-engagement job. This job isn't going to be allowed to KOS D class and CI like the ACM job can. It should only be attacking people that attack the technicians it is with, or itself.

And CI can't even shoot you guys anymore so why do you need "Self defense"?

SCP-RP Moderator | CI LTCOL Boozle LC32 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support but would it be hackable

E11 1LT []FORMER CI MAJOR[]Former MTF OMICRON-9 CAPTAIN[]Former Janitorial Low Command[]Former E11 HCMD[Former overseer of D4,Former experimental, Former E4]
"The fuck is a ethics committee?"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 hours ago, Neo said:

Couldn't have said it better.

And CI can't even shoot you guys anymore so why do you need "Self defense"?

I don't really understand the point of asking why utility need self defense when utility still does get attacked by both D class and CI. There has been a reduction in these events due to recent rule changes, yes-- but they are also still occurring enough that self defense is a justifiable concept for these branches to have. 

Regardless of this fact, we shouldn't deny the Technical branch their level 55 class and a big incentive for activity, especially when it's not even intended to be a pvp class any more than combat engineer is. 

Also, i'd be super down for them being hackable by CI and turning on foundation personnel. I think that would be awesome 👍

O5-9: "Misfortune"  A.K.A.  "Mr. Unlucky"

"Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!"

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CanOBeanz said:

Also, i'd be super down for them being hackable by CI and turning on foundation personnel. I think that would be awesome 

Ahh it's whatever soon enough we be fighting researchers with rocket launchers.

SCP-RP Moderator | CI LTCOL Boozle LC32 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+/- Support
I think that the concept of this job is well thought out, and very cool! But some of the things that are suggested I have to disagree with due to imbalance. Your HP and Armor is significantly higher than a majority GENSEC personnel and some of the MTF operatives from all 3 regiments, those being Nu-7, Omi-9 and E-11, along with some lower ranking CI Operatives. This is a Utilitarian based job and being as how it has doesn't have constant participation in active duty in regards to Foundation security against the threats that may come into, or reside in the Facility, whether it be SCP's or insurgents from GOI's, it seems overpowered. The personnel in your regiment have a very important job to perform and maintain, but as of recent the lack of utilization of MTF personnel has been concerning. The Utilitarian staff of the foundation are non-combatants, and while I can agree with your need of a firearm for self defense, the need for 150/150 is unnecessary, 125/100 would be more reasonable to ask being as how you are non combatants. MTF personnel should always be on standby to assist in defending the Utilitarian staff of the Foundation should a threat arise, and being as how we frequently patrol HCZ and EZ, the odds of you coming across one are quite low short of personnel incorrectly doing their job, whether it be Utilitarian or MTF. So while I do support the concept of the job, I do not support the amount of vitality and protection, 125/100 is more acceptable.

Edited by MTF OM9 COL Daedran CL46
  • Like 1

[Former] Director of Containment | [Current] MTF A1 RRH Operative OH0 | [Former] MTF A1 Executive Commander EC98 |  [Former] SCP-RP Moderator
"He who acts on his own desire, breeds Pestilence" ~ Daedran 2019 |  "Director Rangiatea is not allowed to do “!slay director” and claim Director Blackbeard had a heart attack."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MTF OM9 COL Daedran CL46 said:

+/- Support
I think that the concept of this job is well thought out, and very cool! But some of the things that are suggested I have to disagree with due to imbalance. Your HP and Armor is significantly higher than a majority GENSEC personnel and some of the MTF operatives from all 3 regiments, those being Nu-7, Omi-9 and E-11, along with some lower ranking CI Operatives. This is a Utilitarian based job and being as how it has doesn't have constant participation in active duty in regards to Foundation security against the threats that may come into, or reside in the Facility, whether it be SCP's or insurgents from GOI's, it seems overpowered. The personnel in your regiment have a very important job to perform and maintain, but as of recent the lack of utilization of MTF personnel has been concerning. The Utilitarian staff of the foundation are non-combatants, and while I can agree with your need of a firearm for self defense, the need for 150/150 is unnecessary, 125/100 would be more reasonable to ask being as how you are non combatants. MTF personnel should always be on standby to assist in defending the Utilitarian staff of the Foundation should a threat arise, and being as how we frequently patrol HCZ and EZ, the odds of you coming across one are quite low short of personnel incorrectly doing their job, whether it be Utilitarian or MTF. So while I do support the concept of the job, I do not support the amount of vitality and protection, 125/100 is more acceptable.

Excellent analysis and breakdown of the proposed idea; thank you for bringing some extra perspective on the hp/armor proposed for this job.

After reading this, I agree that 150/150 may be a bit intense for a non-combat job and I support lowering the stats of this job to 125/100 to keep things a bit more realistic and balanced between utility, security, and MTF jobs.

  • Like 2

O5-9: "Misfortune"  A.K.A.  "Mr. Unlucky"

"Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!"

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...