Jump to content

Zeta - SCP/MTF Camping Suggestion - Accepted


NetworkParadox

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? - RULE ADDITION: "No-one should camp outside or within line of sight of a containment chamber for the purpose of instantly recontaining an SCP. (Ex. Camping SCP-939s door as he breaches to avoid feeding him and forcing him on a timer.)

Why should we add it? - Because far too often do I see lazy MTF simply camp the door to an SCP and instantly recontain it within seconds after the SCP spent (usually) well over 25-30 minutes to get out. And now, they must go through a 10 minute breach timer and go through that again.

What are the advantages of having this? - The advantages would make it fair for the SCPs. Why should SCPs have to waste so much of their own personal time just to get forced into a small space for another 40 minutes because players are too lazy to roleplay and feed them? The fact that this isn't a rule yet surprises me, and is likely a good cause for people not to flag up to SCPs much anymore. SCPs spend precious  time to get out, so MTF should spend atleast a tiny bit of effort to grab a Class-D and bring it to the SCP, which brings me to my next point. Class-D are often bored and riot because of it. If Class-D were fed and given the opportunity to explore the map or even escape more often, that would improve Class-D gameplay aswell.

Overall, MTF being lazy should not have to affect the personal time and effort that SCPs and Class-D put in just to experience some gameplay/roleplay.

Who is it mainly for? - SCPs

Links to any content - N/A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support

It may not be too lore friendly, but thing is, if we're gonna be a unique server with self breaching you might as well make it so that you're actually able to breach after that 30 minutes of adverts and times.

insert cliched signature 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support, being 939 and spending 30 minutes breaching just to meet MTF or RCF right outside the last door just to be recontained in less than 15 seconds is the worst feeling in the world. 

Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin 
200.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+/- Support, simply because if they are actualy camping, yea sure, but on the other side, what if they just happen to be there at that time?

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This would constitute puppy guarding a player's spawn, which is already prohibited. Additionally, this could constitute metagaming unless a MTF member or other Foundation member happened to be in the area when the breach began to report it.

Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff

March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2020 at 2:06 PM, [GL] M-2033 said:

+ Support

 

E11 1LT []FORMER CI MAJOR[]Former MTF OMICRON-9 CAPTAIN[]Former Janitorial Low Command[]Former E11 HCMD[Former overseer of D4,Former experimental, Former E4]
"The fuck is a ethics committee?"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is covered by general rule 6.

No camping an opposition spawn.

MTF can only be around an scp spawn for 3 things testing, preventing breech by mean of filling breech request or to protect a tech while they repair the damged CC. 

   spacer.png

You don't have to be the best, you just got to be better than dip shit over there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...