Jump to content

false warn- Accepted


Quangasaurusrex

Recommended Posts

Your In-game: Monekybags

Your SteamID: STEAM_1:1:155903311

 

The admin's name in-game: HamsterofTF2

 

The admin's steam name (If you know it): N/A

 

What warning did you receive: Lying to Staff

 

Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED): image.thumb.png.a50a2ac8d4d8924bd52effc42678a813.png

 

Why do you think this warn was false:  I have evidence that I saw the printers, but I was warned because "There is no way I could see it." and "Lying to staff". They asked if I saw him open his fading door, I might have said he might have, I ended up saying twice "I don't remember". 

 

Any extra information: 6B5A3390FA03B9AE87CA4B3BD12A55879AC641CC

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, K1LLER said:

+Support

Clear Evidence 

 

                                                                                                     |Ex PD LT|Delta squad RCT| Ex senior moderator| 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, springs.exe said:

+Support

Clear Evidence 

Also my reasons on the other post- 

Ender | Former SWAT Lieutenant | Senior Low Command | SWAT FTO | Previous PoliceRP Administrator 

COL Will 1L52 to admins: Max, you ain't going to scare them, you are on a female model and stuttering...

"So what're you doing?" - @SWAT LT Ender 22-D "Putting my clothes back on". - @SWAT SFC Nao 27-D

"There's a fine line between right and wrong. And somewhere, in the shadows, they've sent us to find it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1ST
you never handed this evince when you said you had it during the sit...
2
you told zerg "that musty opened his shooting window"
3
you stated before its not fully transparent(I tried looking but couldn't see in
4
then you said "I dont rember"
 

why I warned you was cause of this, nothing else, if you handed this evince during the sit then maybe it wouldn't be a big deal, but you said If I warned you, you would appeal it and report me, you would go though that much trouble to be stubborn instead of just handing a photo over...
you were the one to drag it on 49 minutes long.
the opposing side had evince agenst you
I could have added more but I dident cause of the phantom evince.

18 hours ago, Quangasaurusrex said:

Why do you think this warn was false:  I have evidence that I saw the printers, but I was warned because "There is no way I could see it." and "Lying to staff". They asked if I saw him open his fading door, I might have said he might have, I ended up saying twice "I don't remember". 

The front Part is not why I warned you
zerg told me that you said that he opened his shooting window
you changed your story a few times, is what led to you getting warned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

you never handed this evince when you said you had it during the sit...

Quote

The burden of proof SHOULD NOT be against me. I have evidence that I saw the printers, but I was warned because "There is no way I could see it."

 

23 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

you told zerg "that musty opened his shooting window"

 

19 hours ago, Quangasaurusrex said:

They asked if I saw him open his fading door, I might have said he might have, I ended up saying twice "I don't remember". 

 

23 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

you stated before its not fully transparent(I tried looking but couldn't see in

image.png.a668843f2b7ef65891e17ffbc3931100.png

 

24 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

then you said "I dont rember"

 

19 hours ago, Quangasaurusrex said:

I ended up saying twice "I don't remember"

 

24 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

 the opposing side had evince agenst you

image.thumb.png.1ed7ab39ec7f01f7e4a3b12bae0bb6c6.png

 

25 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

you changed your story a few times, is what led to you getting warned

Explain to me logically why I would lie if I have clear evidence that I have it.

 

 

The whole point is the fact that if I did not have evidence, I would have gotten warned for it without appeal. There was some reasonable doubt, which is the whole point of not getting warned. There should be no reasonable doubt that the offender committed the offence.

26 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

you were the one to drag it on 49 minutes long.

No, you brought me multiple times and got Zerg involved. You could have warned me then and there, or not at all.

27 minutes ago, HamsterOfTF2 said:

that much trouble to be stubborn

read this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LuckyGoose said:

Its clearly + Support no need to quote everything all reasons above.

If anyone does that again that had not already left a +/- already including quanga. Will have their post hidden. 

Edited by Chief_

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin

+Support

Reason above, this could have been handled better. He does clearly have evidence, however you must take into account that he might have been uploading it to YouTube at the time. I really don't see how this is lying to staff 

ALs6j_EhXkr61kQS1B7NLXq2Y5mRM1v5siUmOqed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

idkkk  this might be  metagaming in a way because hes looking though a wall  idk if this is allowed  or not because in the motd it states something like this +- support 

                       

                        SWAT PVT Hannah XR39-CPL Hannah King  XC65 - Hannah King 

                                              

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hannah King said:

idkkk  this might be  metagaming in a way because hes looking though a wall  idk if this is allowed  or not because in the motd it states something like this +- support 

You can also see through tinted windows. It's not my fault he made it visible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Quangasaurusrex said:

You can also see through tinted windows. It's not my fault he made it visible.

if it was the window +support

                       

                        SWAT PVT Hannah XR39-CPL Hannah King  XC65 - Hannah King 

                                              

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin

Accepted

Go into the ban panel (at the top it says ban) sign in, go to your profile, go to your warn and click appeal. Fill the information out and in the description put the link to this in it.

PoliceRP I Head Admin I PD: Colonel I Retired SWAT Commander Deputy Sheriff 

ImperialRP I Retired Grand Inquisitor 47th Battalion I Chimaera Legion I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...