أنا آكل الأطفال م Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 What you want to see? - a system where scps can break through CP doors in the same way as a self breach but still have the doors function for everyone else Why should we add it? - it’s dumb that scps have to wait at CP doors and it makes teaming happen less What are the advantages of having this? - SCPs can break through doors and not have to wait for someone to open the door Who is it mainly for? - SCPs Creator Of The Clifford Test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Light Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 +/-Support SCPs are supposed to be difficult and most SCPs Can't even break the doors.This would be good only for SCP-682 since he's supposed to be the strongest of them all and it would make more sense if this was Applied to 682. Former "Foundation Doctor and a Medical Doctor are 2 god damn different things." -Light "Can you heal me."-Entire Foundation "Ok Sophia"-Arium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritz Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 1 minute ago, The Light said: +/-Support SCPs are supposed to be difficult and most SCPs Can't even break the doors.This would be good only for SCP-682 since he's supposed to be the strongest of them all and it would make more sense if this was Applied to 682. Pretty much this but also for 076-2 since in lore he can get through a reinforced steel security door in 4 minutes. Was Nu7 2LT Shot Once Was a Nu7 MSGT also was a CI Captain once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bionicle Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 +/- support, would work well only for scps like 682 and 076-2, so im fine with them getting it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corners Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 49 minutes ago, Bionicle said: +/- support, would work well only for scps like 682 and 076-2, so im fine with them getting it Loves Corners, Corner. Corner. Former Imperial Commandos VCMDR Fixer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
أنا آكل الأطفال م Posted February 10, 2020 Author Share Posted February 10, 2020 i should’ve specified but what i meant to say is that specific scps (682,939,076-2) should be able to Creator Of The Clifford Test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Light Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 3 hours ago, أنا آكل الأطفال م said: i should’ve specified but what i meant to say is that specific scps (682,939,076-2) should be able to If its going to include 939 then -Support Former "Foundation Doctor and a Medical Doctor are 2 god damn different things." -Light "Can you heal me."-Entire Foundation "Ok Sophia"-Arium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakub Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 5 hours ago, Bionicle said: +/- support, would work well only for scps like 682 and 076-2, so im fine with them getting it Ex E11 COL, Ex A1 MAJ, Ex AHOTS, Ex Security 2LT, Ex Admin. Current CI 2LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chell/Charlotte Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 (edited) I mean, it would also work with SCP 096 when enraged. Considering he can and will do anything to kill the person(s) who looked at him. Edited February 10, 2020 by Chell/Charlotte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 +/- Support +This does make sense. As long as only 682, 076-2(when someone runs through CP while trying to kill them), and 096(when someone runs through CP after seeing 096's face) - Could be abused by saying that there was someone who saw their face when staff tp's. Also, most SCP's would wait at the CP for that to happen. It can be abused so I am mainly leaning towards a -support unless valid/good rules/guidelines are set in place. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starr Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 20 hours ago, The Light said: +/-Support SCPs are supposed to be difficult and most SCPs Can't even break the doors.This would be good only for SCP-682 since he's supposed to be the strongest of them all and it would make more sense if this was Applied to 682. i mean im just gonna leave this one to SMT though insert cliched signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts