Chief_ Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 Please make sure suggestions are pertinent and relevant! What do you want to see? - A new branch that has been talked about for a long time. The Ethics Committee. (could be a subset of the research branch) Why should we add it? - Because there are reasons why this should be added. As they are the people who take care of the people and make sure tests are for valid reasons. Example: a Researcher wants to do a test where they have a d-class try to attack 939. That is unethical because we all know what is going to happen with it. Or seeing what happens when you put cyanide into the bloodstream of a D-class. I normally stop these on my Security job but I ain't always on to prevent that. What are the advantages of having this? - Allows for there to be more RP and then we could possibly have self-updating lore. For example, if there is a new thing a researcher found out about an scp. Like 106 really likes a certain thing, then at a next meeting, the containment procedures can be updated to lure him away from the MTF escorting a d-class to his RC. This will allow for more RP to be conducted and also to stop mingy researchers from doing mingy tests. Who is it mainly for? - Everyone in the server Links to any content - N/A. We can use the models we have on the server for the models. Ps. Depending on if this gets added, I suggest that only certain ranks can stop certain researchers from testing for unethical reasons. And that when someone calls someone out for being unethical they have to file a report. Also that it will be hard to get into like A1. So that mingy people don't go around and yell your unethical. (I have had this happen when I was the Director of the IA (Intelligence Agency) on a Roblox server. Just think about it. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emoonk Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 While this would be hard to have consistent RP of, I still respect the idea. I don't think it will go through, but +support from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araniel Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 (edited) + Support: This idea has my full support. Edited January 8, 2020 by Felwinter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M8VP ツ Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 49 minutes ago, Emoonk said: While this would be hard to have consistent RP of, I still respect the idea. I don't think it will go through, but +support from me. 1 Retired CI LTCMDR | Proud Enuzer | Roblox Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 +- Support Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics. "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susel Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Falxen said: +- Support Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics. Nooooooo, we MTF don't need it at all. We never commit war crimes. Edited January 8, 2020 by Susel 1 Susel - Retired MTF person - "Teamwork makes the dream work" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabbo Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Susel said: +- Support Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics. MTF Are the most ethical people in the world, Not a single one has gunned down defenceless people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadAim Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 OH MY GOD ITS HAPPENING Retired Imperial RP Super Admin and Grand General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Alpha_ Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 +Support sounds solid. 3 hours ago, Falxen said: +- Support Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics. We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical. Former DHOS Current GENSEC LTCOL - Deputy Head Juggernaut - HIRU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange 🍊 Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 -Support a little unneeded If a branch wanted to be "Ethical" command could just apply restrictions. This also would make it harder for new researchers to create test as they have even more limited options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 22 minutes ago, _Alpha_ said: +Support sounds solid. We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical. It aint a war crime if the things you do it to arent human! "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoovy Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 oh no 4 Former SCP:RP Event Team Leader (5/15/19 - 12/31/19) Current SCP:RP Head Administrator "I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted January 8, 2020 Author Share Posted January 8, 2020 What this is meant to be is also a different perspective for the command members of the branches. Kindoff like naval on imperial rp. They just made sure everything is alright. And that they could (if sa is ok with it) administer door punishments when not closing the door when they can (not being chased by ci or a scp. But when the server is calm then yes.) 3 hours ago, Official Orange said: -Support a little unneeded If a branch wanted to be "Ethical" command could just apply restrictions. This also would make it harder for new researchers to create test as they have even more limited options. That is why only certain ranks can ad they are trusted more. Like a rct can't deny a jr on a test without perm from higher ranks. Unless its like, I want to see what happens when a d-class gets s gun. If that is what the researcher is doing and they are a jr. They should contact security. 56 minutes ago, Hoovy said: oh no Btw. You won't be able to take our money anymore Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakub Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 +Support would be nice to have a branch like this Ex E11 COL, Ex A1 MAJ, Ex AHOTS, Ex Security 2LT, Ex Admin. Current CI 2LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seeker (Tavdogg1) Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 This is it boys. New branch is incoming. There are three types of people... There are hunters... There are prey... And then I, Alex B, comes back after so long to Security with the new name of Seeker that nobody remembers me anymore, but I don't care and I just want to shoot D-Class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starr Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 (edited) ig +support Edited January 8, 2020 by starr insert cliched signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 4 hours ago, _Alpha_ said: +Support sounds solid. We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoovy Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 12 hours ago, Chief_ said: As they are the people who take care of the people and make sure tests are for valid reasons. -Support That's literally research command. I see zero point in adding this branch. I'm all for adding another branch into the server, but an Ethics Committee branch would be awful. Former SCP:RP Event Team Leader (5/15/19 - 12/31/19) Current SCP:RP Head Administrator "I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Hoovy said: oh no +Support just for the sake that Hoovy cannot take our wages anymore (Thats a joke, my previous statement still stands) "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted January 8, 2020 Author Share Posted January 8, 2020 32 minutes ago, Hoovy said: -Support That's literally research command. I see zero point in adding this branch. I'm all for adding another branch into the server, but an Ethics Committee branch would be awful. Ok. I can see what you mean. By valid test I mean tests that are ok. As I stated above about not letting mingy researchers do mingy tests. Also I look at other branches in the scp wiki. So others are really for off site. Like logistics and IA. But I do see what you mean. I do agree it is partly research command but we are also suppose to make sure other branches are also ethical. 4 hours ago, _Alpha_ said: +Support sounds solid. We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical. Your going to the brig. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catsro Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 8 hours ago, Official Orange said: -Support a little unneeded If a branch wanted to be "Ethical" command could just apply restrictions. This also would make it harder for new researchers to create test as they have even more limited options. SCPRP Head Admin | Ex SCPRP Event Team Leader | Ex CI LTCMDR | O5-13 Catsro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fool Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 6 hours ago, Hoovy said: oh no I thought we killed them all shit Being serious -Support Most of what needs to be said has already been said But in general ethics would not work for our server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOBeanz Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 -Support I dig the RP and lore-friendly potential of this idea, but from a mechanical standpoint, I feel like this wouldn't really fit into the server with how our command already run the branches. I also fear that this would turn into a group of people using RP to act like they can tell people what to do all over the facility. O5-9: "Misfortune" A.K.A. "Mr. Unlucky" "Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Light Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 -Support This is pretty pointless since there's a reason why there's already Command and they can make restrictions/rules and they take care of there department. Now don't get me wrong I like the idea but I feel like it would turn into a group of power-hungry people. PS: Just Join the Ethics CC or Just make a new Ethics CC if you can't join it...... Former "Foundation Doctor and a Medical Doctor are 2 god damn different things." -Light "Can you heal me."-Entire Foundation "Ok Sophia"-Arium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berserkrpups Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 5 hours ago, Hoovy said: -Support That's literally research command. I see zero point in adding this branch. I'm all for adding another branch into the server, but an Ethics Committee branch would be awful. Big Body Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts