Jump to content

Ethics Branch (hear me out) - Denied


Chief_

Recommended Posts

 

Please make sure suggestions are pertinent and relevant! 

What do you want to see? - A new branch that has been talked about for a long time. The Ethics Committee. (could be a subset of the research branch)

Why should we add it? - Because there are reasons why this should be added. As they are the people who take care of the people and make sure tests are for valid reasons. Example: a Researcher wants to do a test where they have a d-class try to attack 939. That is unethical because we all know what is going to happen with it. Or seeing what happens when you put cyanide into the bloodstream of a D-class. I normally stop these on my Security job but I ain't always on to prevent that. 

What are the advantages of having this? - Allows for there to be more RP and then we could possibly have self-updating lore. For example, if there is a new thing a researcher found out about an scp. Like 106 really likes a certain thing, then at a next meeting, the containment procedures can be updated to lure him away from the MTF escorting a d-class to his RC. This will allow for more RP to be conducted and also to stop mingy researchers from doing mingy tests. 

Who is it mainly for? - Everyone in the server

Links to any content - N/A. We can use the models we have on the server for the models.

Ps. Depending on if this gets added, I suggest that only certain ranks can stop certain researchers from testing for unethical reasons. And that when someone calls someone out for being unethical they have to file a report. Also that it will be hard to get into like A1. So that mingy people don't go around and yell your unethical. (I have had this happen when I was the Director of the IA (Intelligence Agency) on a Roblox server. 

Just think about it. 

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+- Support

Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics.

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Falxen said:

+- Support

Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics.

Nooooooo, we MTF don't need it at all. We never commit war crimes. 

Edited by Susel
  • Laughing 1

Susel - Retired MTF person - "Teamwork makes the dream work"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Susel said:

+- Support

Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics.

MTF Are the most ethical people in the world, Not a single one has gunned down defenceless people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support sounds solid.

3 hours ago, Falxen said:

+- Support

Sure, i like the idea, but i also believe it might be a bit mingy, also, why make it a part of research specificaly? Hell, i know Sec/MTF/Util can also use some ethics.

We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical.

Former DHOS

Current GENSEC LTCOL - Deputy Head Juggernaut - HIRU 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, _Alpha_ said:

+Support sounds solid.

We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical.

It aint a war crime if the things you do it to arent human!

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What this is meant to be is also a different perspective for the command members of the branches. Kindoff like naval on imperial rp. They just made sure everything is alright. And that they could (if sa is ok with it) administer door punishments when not closing the door when they can (not being chased by ci or a scp. But when the server is calm then yes.)

3 hours ago, Official Orange said:

-Support a little unneeded

If a branch wanted to be "Ethical" command could just apply restrictions. This also would make it harder for new researchers to create test as they have even more limited options.

That is why only certain ranks can ad they are trusted more. Like a rct can't deny a jr on a test without perm from higher ranks. Unless its like, I want to see what happens when a d-class gets s gun. If that is what the researcher is doing and they are a jr. They should contact security.

56 minutes ago, Hoovy said:

oh no

Btw. You won't be able to take our money anymore 😉

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Chief_ said:

As they are the people who take care of the people and make sure tests are for valid reasons.

-Support That's literally research command. I see zero point in adding this branch. I'm all for adding another branch into the server, but an Ethics Committee branch would be awful.

fUbePnj.png

Former SCP:RP Event Team Leader (5/15/19 - 12/31/19)

Current SCP:RP Head Administrator

"I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoovy said:

oh no

+Support just for the sake that Hoovy cannot take our wages anymore

(Thats a joke, my previous statement still stands)

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Hoovy said:

-Support That's literally research command. I see zero point in adding this branch. I'm all for adding another branch into the server, but an Ethics Committee branch would be awful.

Ok. I can see what you mean. By valid test I mean tests that are ok. As I stated above about not letting mingy researchers do mingy tests. Also I look at other branches in the scp wiki. So others are really for off site. Like logistics and IA. But I do see what you mean. I do agree it is partly research command but we are also suppose to make sure other branches are also ethical.

4 hours ago, _Alpha_ said:

+Support sounds solid.

We security don't need it, gassing D-class with mustard gas is ethical.

Your going to the brig.

Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager ||  I aM sPeCiAl || 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Official Orange said:

-Support a little unneeded

If a branch wanted to be "Ethical" command could just apply restrictions. This also would make it harder for new researchers to create test as they have even more limited options.

 

 SCPRP Head Admin | Ex SCPRP Event Team Leader |  Ex CI LTCMDR |  O5-13 Catsro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support

I dig the RP and lore-friendly potential of this idea, but from a mechanical standpoint, I feel like this wouldn't really fit into the server with how our command already run the branches. I also fear that this would turn into a group of people using RP to act like they can tell people what to do all over the facility.

O5-9: "Misfortune"  A.K.A.  "Mr. Unlucky"

"Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!"

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support
This is pretty pointless since there's a reason why there's already Command and they can make restrictions/rules and they take care of there department. Now don't get me wrong I like the idea but I feel like it would turn into a group of power-hungry people. 
PS: Just Join the Ethics CC or Just make a new Ethics CC if you can't join it......

Former  

70672632_Untitled(15).png.7d232f74c3ac9624b835990cffc361e8.png

"Foundation Doctor and a Medical Doctor are 2 god damn different things." -Light   "Can you heal me."-Entire Foundation   "Ok Sophia"-Arium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...