Jump to content

Staff Handbook Suggestion


ViperKimg

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? -  I want to see a new rule added to the staff handbook saying all sits must be conducted with all players present.

Why should we add it? -  I've been getting a lot of unfair sits lately where I get brought to a sit and the person who reported me just asks the admin "Hey where are you in teamspeak/discord?" and then the admin and player reporting me go into a discord/teamspeak room and have a conversation and I'm left there for 5 minutes just watching both of them look around but I can't hear anything they are saying to each other, then the staff member comes back and just says "Okay, you are going to be receiving a warn today." Or, if I'm the one calling the sit, they'll do the same thing except the staff member will come back and say "Yeah, I can't warn him." Without even taking my side or allowing me to speak. I believe this is EXTREMELY unprofessional as well as unfair. Therefore, whether the sit is going to be held in-game, through teamspeak, or on discord, all members of the sit should be required to be present so that everyone can voice their own side.

What are the advantages of having this? - Less false warns/More correct warns

Who is it mainly for? - Everyone

Links to any content - N/A

SX CEO ViperKimg | EMS/FR Reserves | Gaminglight Member Since 2017 | Donated Over $850 | Ex-PoliceRP Staff | $1,000,000,000 Achieved In-Game | Married to @EmptiedSkies ❤️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-suport i dont think we shoudl we do sometimes need to listen toboth sides of the sotry and we need to listen to them sepritly somethiimes bc we never know tha tone of tu to can be a ming and keep intrupting us or u could be geting a link and yah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i do see his point i do agree we should have all party's there when talking. But no matter what unless its clear as day and a staff member watches you breaking server rules is the only time we dont need both sides. But thats not really how we should handle it is talk to both party's or even inform the victim on what happen.

Former FBI COS | PD LT | DS PFC | Former HRT Overseer | Gaminglight PRP Admin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

Edited by Jayden

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

 

                       

                        SWAT PVT Hannah XR39-CPL Hannah King  XC65 - Hannah King 

                                              

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hannah King said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

 

Ender | Former SWAT Lieutenant | Senior Low Command | SWAT FTO | Previous PoliceRP Administrator 

COL Will 1L52 to admins: Max, you ain't going to scare them, you are on a female model and stuttering...

"So what're you doing?" - @SWAT LT Ender 22-D "Putting my clothes back on". - @SWAT SFC Nao 27-D

"There's a fine line between right and wrong. And somewhere, in the shadows, they've sent us to find it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

 

 “The only way that we can live is if we grow. The only way we can grow is if we change. The only way we can change is if we learn. The only way we can learn is if we are exposed. And the only way that we are exposed is if we throw ourselves into the open.” — C. Joybell

|| Proud Member of GamingLight since March 2018 ||

|| Former MTF Alpha-1 MAJ || Former NSA Director || Former MTF E-11 CPL || Former SWAT CMDR ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Manager
22 hours ago, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

 

〖  PoliceRP Senior Management Team | Manager

〖  Lead Account Manager  〗

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going along with what Jayden said.

I myself also took a report where the person had evedince. So I went into a call. Saw the evedince, talked to the rule breaker, and a verbal was gone. 

However if a staff member dosen't give you or the other person a chance to speak. You could always make a report on them.

Signature.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Masterson said:

Going along with what Jayden said.

I myself also took a report where the person had evedince. So I went into a call. Saw the evedince, talked to the rule breaker, and a verbal was gone. 

However if a staff member dosen't give you or the other person a chance to speak. You could always make a report on them.

Hey how’s it going the reason we don’t make reports about stuff like this when a staff member doesn’t let us give us our side, it’s because we don’t have enough evidence, let me explain, if me or someone else makes a staff report and I say this staff member was not letting me say my side and I don’t have evidence, I see this happen a lot not just twords me but the staff member will just say I don’t remember this or it was obvious so I warned you, then it gets denied.                                         What I think about this: think it should just be in training too hear both sides even when evidence is provided just too see if there might be a slight arguement

"I feel i should say something profound, like one small step for man; All that i think of to say, is i feel like i have waited for this day for centuries"-Harrison Wells
"You where good son, real good; Maybe even the best."-TF2  | Military RP Spetznaz1st LT United States Sergeant

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 4:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

I agree with this, Both players do not NECESSARILY need to hear eachothers side, However with this being said i do believe that the person getting reported should ALWAYS have a full understanding of why the report was called, evidence of the rulebreaking, etc before a punishment is handed out. (Unless they're being super mingy) The only thing i would have an issue with is if someone was punished without being told what they did and having the chance to defend themselves vocally with the staff member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

There are wounds that never show on the body that are deeper and more hurtful than anything that bleeds.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin
On 12/21/2019 at 5:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

Couldn't have said it better, Jayden.

  • Like 1

Forklift_Signature.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2019 at 12:36 AM, Will (WTLM2013) said:

 

On 12/21/2019 at 5:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

Nice job Jayden! 

FBI SAIC 

PD CPL 

Member since September of 2018

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 5:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

110% couldn’t have said it better my self

Trooper SGT PD SM SPRT SGT DOC SGT CO SS SSO SPHP Head PM | LOA

Noah Jimes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 3:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

Most of the time when i go into a call its to see the video evidence they have.

Many of you do not know me, some of y'all do-ICON

SCU DEPUTY COMMANDER,PD CPT,EMS,DELTA SQUAD,TROOPER,FBI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
3
On 12/21/2019 at 4:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

People should be allowed to give their sides of the story, but sometimes you have to separate the members of the sit for the sake of order.

Currently a member of the Support Team, SRT, Dispatcher, EMS, and PD SM.

Former Senior moderator, SWAT, Event Team, Secret Service, DD, and State Police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 5:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2019 at 5:01 PM, Jayden said:

-support

I truly don't think an entire rule for that is necessary. If a discord/teamspeak call takes place to discuss evidence or whatever it may be, the staff member should know by default that they need to hear both sides when they return in-game anyway. Instead of adding an entire rule, maybe this should be emphasized by a higher ranking staff member of the staff team so that whoever has already made the mistake of going straight to punishment, can change their ways.

I had this same situation yesterday. I answered a report and before bringing whoever was reported, I had the victim show me the evidence first. The evidence showed that the reported player did in fact break a rule, but I still ended up bringing him to the sit in order to hear his side. No way would I have gone straight to warning them.

 

Ender | Former SWAT Lieutenant | Senior Low Command | SWAT FTO | Previous PoliceRP Administrator 

COL Will 1L52 to admins: Max, you ain't going to scare them, you are on a female model and stuttering...

"So what're you doing?" - @SWAT LT Ender 22-D "Putting my clothes back on". - @SWAT SFC Nao 27-D

"There's a fine line between right and wrong. And somewhere, in the shadows, they've sent us to find it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...