Dr. Ternith Plague Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 What you want to see? - An addition of roleplay for SCP-106 and Janitorial Staff other than just a simple advert. For example, adverting, then rolling against 106, and if that fails, an assist being required or waiting until the next advert for 106 is done. Example for possible additions: SCP 106 - Every 25 minutes a Containment Cleaner needs to apply a base, to neutralize the acidic property of SCP-106’s cell. This advert must be rolled for against SCP-106 or a staff member. If failed and the assist roll fails as well (from Epsilon-11 or another Containment Cleaner), the Foundation Staff attempting re-containment must wait for the next advert to be used from SCP-106 in order for a second attempt. SCP-106 needs to advert along the lines of, “SCP-106’s cell is being withered away, apply a base within 20/15/10/5 minutes.” This needs to be repeated after the original advert. Why should we add it? - Most SCP-106 players cannot breach until the following happens: CI decide to let 106 out (rarer than you think due to the COS rule for 106), D-Class let 106 out (they all pass by), a 106 Breach Event happens (Hoovy says just about no Breach Events), or 106 breaches containment (this is what this post is about). What are the advantages of having this? - SCP-106 can breach a bit more (but not expansively more) and Janitorial Staff can have a bit more excitement while role-playing as they don't have to do one advert and then walk off. As well, it can make MTF more useful as they don't just wander around and are more weary of their surrounding and chat as well. Who is it mainly for? - Janitorial Staff and players who play SCP-106. As well as MTF to consider having to keep closer watch on SCPs like 106. Links to any content - N/A Author of the OFFICIAL Thing's Rangiatea is not Allowed to do at the Foundation (THRAF) Former SCP-RP Staff, Event Team, Teamspeak Support Member Current Riot Trooper Officer, Stormtrooper Sergeant First Class - ImperialRP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 -/+Support We should hold off on this. People are still getting used to the rules involving Self-Breach and the duties of a Containment Cleaner/Engineer and adding another thing they would have to remember would just cause more stress and be a pain in the arse to remember. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breen Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 -support give people time to adapt to self breaching, it is fairly new gog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rektify Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 9 hours ago, Gunther said: -/+Support We should hold off on this. People are still getting used to the rules involving Self-Breach and the duties of a Containment Cleaner/Engineer and adding another thing they would have to remember would just cause more stress and be a pain in the arse to remember. +Support I think people are more than capable of handling something such as this. It's a small tweak but it would give for a better rp with 106. ~Your Local SCP Lead Admin~ Aka: Rekti-HighThe REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 -Support, simply because this would make 106 a special case, we dont have to roll against other SCP's, so why would we have to roll against this one? "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catsro Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 16 hours ago, Breen said: -support give people time to adapt to self breaching, it is fairly new SCPRP Head Admin | Ex SCPRP Event Team Leader | Ex CI LTCMDR | O5-13 Catsro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted December 11, 2019 Share Posted December 11, 2019 On 12/10/2019 at 4:45 AM, Rektify Deez Nutz said: +Support I think people are more than capable of handling something such as this. It's a small tweak but it would give for a better rp with 106. I agree here. Personally, I would like to see rolls utilized more often in RP situations to better balance out actions and to give each side a fair chance. Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted December 11, 2019 Share Posted December 11, 2019 4 hours ago, Rookieblue said: I agree here. Personally, I would like to see rolls utilized more often in RP situations to better balance out actions and to give each side a fair chance. True. But instead of rolling against ad the is no reason to. They have to roll to clean it. Just like when doors break. 50+ Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mervin Posted December 11, 2019 Share Posted December 11, 2019 On 12/10/2019 at 5:45 AM, Rektify Deez Nutz said: +Support I think people are more than capable of handling something such as this. It's a small tweak but it would give for a better rp with 106. ^ ~Mervin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakub Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 On 12/10/2019 at 10:45 AM, Rektify Deez Nutz said: +Support I think people are more than capable of handling something such as this. It's a small tweak but it would give for a better rp with 106. Ex E11 COL, Ex A1 MAJ, Ex AHOTS, Ex Security 2LT, Ex Admin. Current CI 2LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts