cammy1706

Adding back old Fail base rule - Accepted

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? - Add back 2 people Width rule for bases 

Why should we add it? - it would stop minge bases and would improve rp when raiding for gov and crims cause the now we are getting like one small Prop to break and it is ruining RP 

What are the advantages of having this? - make less minge bases and improve RP

Who is it mainly for? - People who raid 

 

i think this would make RP so much more fun for both sides and for gov we could be able to stack up and have realistic raiding Rp and also means if a ofc stops in middle of raiding a base you could go around 

 

Hope yous will think about it 

Thanks Cammy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+Support

Its been some time sense I have been on this server and one of the biggest problems I have seen so far is how hard it is to raid ANY bases. We cant even get into the front door on some bases and then everyone gets stuck. PLEASE ADD THIS BACK IT HELPS WITH RAIDING SO MUCH. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Dondi 2.0 said:

+Support 

Its been some time sense I have been on this server and one of the biggest problems I have seen so far is how hard it is to raid ANY bases. We cant even get into the front door on some bases and then everyone gets stuck. PLEASE ADD THIS BACK IT HELPS WITH RAIDING SO MUCH. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Dondi 2.0 said:

+Support

Its been some time sense I have been on this server and one of the biggest problems I have seen so far is how hard it is to raid ANY bases. We cant even get into the front door on some bases and then everyone gets stuck. PLEASE ADD THIS BACK IT HELPS WITH RAIDING SO MUCH. 

I fully agree, Its so hard to raid any base rn.


Ex. Superadmin - AnimeRP Ex. Senior Admin (AND FIRST) - PoliceRP   Ex. Senior Moderator - PoliceRP
Ex. Admin - Clonewars Ex. Admin - DarkRP 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+support

When I try to raid as Gov, or heck any class, and the only fading door prop is a tiny cube in a corner that I can't see, it's entirely failbase worthy.  There've been times where the entire Gov raiding force gets slaughtered cuz we can't find the prop to battering ram it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Ronin said:

+support

When I try to raid as Gov, or heck any class, and the only fading door prop is a tiny cube in a corner that I can't see, it's entirely failbase worthy.  There've been times where the entire Gov raiding force gets slaughtered cuz we can't find the prop to battering ram it.

 


PoliceRP: Leader and Founder of the Grove Street Crips and Retired FBI DAD, SS/CAT Reserves. Staff: Ex-Senior mod and Ex-Modx2
1944RP: 500th Obersturmbannfuhrer Phil(OberFuhrer of the SS before the Server shut)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Dondi 2.0 said:

+Support

Its been some time sense I have been on this server and one of the biggest problems I have seen so far is how hard it is to raid ANY bases. We cant even get into the front door on some bases and then everyone gets stuck. PLEASE ADD THIS BACK IT HELPS WITH RAIDING SO MUCH. 

 


PD SM | Moderator | EMS AEMT | ARU | SX Krait | PD Best Driver | ~Torty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-Support

I, for one, believe that the rule is completely fine and balancing. 

Government has the numbers, gas, shield, guns, and much more. I believe the removal of this rule helped to balance the raiding scale.

I do not think it should be removed as it is crucial in making it at least close to being fair between government and criminals.

Edited by JackOG

                                                                                                                       PoliceRP Staff Member

                                                                 MSGT JackOG 1A56 | SRT PVT JackOG 1S15| Trooper CPL JackOG 1T77

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JackOG said:

-Support

I, for one, believe that the rule is completely fine and balancing. 

Government has the numbers, gas, shield, guns, and much more. I believe the removal of this rule helped to balance the raiding scale.

I do not think it should be removed as it is crucial in making it at least close to being fair between government and criminals.

jack this is adding a rule to make it fairer not removing a Rule 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cammy1706 said:

jack this is adding a rule to make it fairer not removing a Rule 

 

Sorry

Correction: I do not think the rule should be added as it is crucial in making it at least close to being fair between government and criminals.

  • Haha 1

                                                                                                                       PoliceRP Staff Member

                                                                 MSGT JackOG 1A56 | SRT PVT JackOG 1S15| Trooper CPL JackOG 1T77

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ronin said:

+support

When I try to raid as Gov, or heck any class, and the only fading door prop is a tiny cube in a corner that I can't see, it's entirely failbase worthy.  There've been times where the entire Gov raiding force gets slaughtered cuz we can't find the prop to battering ram it.

 


Max Holland - police rp Admin | police rp- police Sargent Major,  FBI SNR SA|Imperial rp- Lord IV/ ex starfighter COL|CWRP - 501 PVT|Mill rp - US PVT|SCPRP- Ex CI PFC, Depressed Classed d. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-/+ Support

This is a hard discussion as you got 2 groups.

Gov and crim and everyone knows who is - and + supporting. We cannever make both sides happy. Never

+ Makes ''cancer'' bases easier to actually properly raid.

+ No endless raids by gov wich we just get tired from.

- I like n challange

- Shouldn't be to easy

- Government can come back (so can crim) with alot of numbers, we have gass, you name it.

- Embrases tac to actualy think and play smart (+Running through stacked up fences is not that tho)

  • Again, its hard to even out the rules because in the end every side will just rant about it

kHCqRsj.png

Proud GL Member since 2017

S.W.A.T Commander

Senior Admin - PoliceRP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Ronin said:

+support

When I try to raid as Gov, or heck any class, and the only fading door prop is a tiny cube in a corner that I can't see, it's entirely failbase worthy.  There've been times where the entire Gov raiding force gets slaughtered cuz we can't find the prop to battering ram it.

+support

I play on both gov and crim and this only further made this seem like criminalrp than policerp. While i do agree there needs top be balancing removing that rule imbalanced it for the government 

Edited by Jimmy James

FBI Director 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Freeze said:

-/+ Support

This is a hard discussion as you got 2 groups.

Gov and crim and everyone knows who is - and + supporting. We cannever make both sides happy. Never

+ Makes ''cancer'' bases easier to actually properly raid.

+ No endless raids by gov wich we just get tired from.

- I like n challange

- Shouldn't be to easy

- Government can come back (so can crim) with alot of numbers, we have gass, you name it.

- Embrases tac to actualy think and play smart (+Running through stacked up fences is not that tho)

  • Again, its hard to even out the rules because in the end every side will just rant about it

see if we do add it back gov will be too OP and if we don't crim will be OP ya know what i'm saying?

im going with freeze with a +/- Support

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind the narrow halls, the only thing I ever had an issue with is finding the tiny prop used for the fading door, which is colored to match the background or mostly invisible 75% of the time anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+/- Support

With the significant power advantage Gov’t has over Criminals, I believe it’s only fair that they’re allowed these halls.

 

Allow me to provide an alternative, make a rule where fading doors must be clearly visible and easy to determine. I.E. no small blocks, posts, same colored/materialized walls, etc.

 


- SRT Commander Blitzton 1K67 - PD MSGT Blitzton 1C67 - Future Pilot -

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-support Gov have numbers, shields, gas, etc and criminals should absolutely have the advantage of being able to make super hard bases like this. however, I DO think we should adding a rule that states the fading door should be very clear like a different color or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Ronin said:

+support

When I try to raid as Gov, or heck any class, and the only fading door prop is a tiny cube in a corner that I can't see, it's entirely failbase worthy.  There've been times where the entire Gov raiding force gets slaughtered cuz we can't find the prop to battering ram it.

 


spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Snar added this rule since government since government just goes flying pasted the base. Definitely does not help with some tactical units going 90 miles per hour. 

 

The current basing rule stops government from going in bases with no brains. Forces them to use tactics and to stack up. 


spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Calamity said:

Snar added this rule since government since government just goes flying pasted the base. Definitely does not help with some tactical units going 90 miles per hour. 

 

The current basing rule stops government from going in bases with no brains. Forces them to use tactics and to stack up. 

do u mean removed the rule 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cammy1706 said:

do u mean removed the rule 

No, he replaced the rule


spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Idk why but last time a check the motd the rule was still in the motd saying you must have 2 people back to back for it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, John Kill said:

Idk why but last time a check the motd the rule was still in the motd saying you must have 2 people back to back for it 

this is the old side by side rule 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.