PhenixBoy300 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 What do you want to see? - Removing the Assult Blaster from the Navel Clases Why should we add it? - Because it's unrealistic, Naval officers don't carry an AR with them, that's for storm troopers. What are the advantages of having this? - Makes it more realistic and can add more RP Who is it mainly for? - Navel Links to any content - N/A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
borith Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 -support Naval end up on the field to help lead you guys so they need it for defensive purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJackForce Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 -support we only have one good gun and we end up leading the troops anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berserkrpups Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 +Support Naval as a whole really shouldn't be partaking in a whole lot of combat as they can still lead on the ground via FOB or setting up defenses with shock/nova(once they are added) but for the most part it should be the commanders/officers leading troops on the ground. While naval leads in space. Big Body Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadAim Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 2 hours ago, Berserkrpups said: +Support Naval as a whole really shouldn't be partaking in a whole lot of combat as they can still lead on the ground via FOB or setting up defenses with shock/nova(once they are added) but for the most part it should be the commanders/officers leading troops on the ground. While naval leads in space. Retired Imperial RP Super Admin and Grand General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enuz 💣 Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 3 hours ago, Berserkrpups said: +Support Naval as a whole really shouldn't be partaking in a whole lot of combat as they can still lead on the ground via FOB or setting up defenses with shock/nova(once they are added) but for the most part it should be the commanders/officers leading troops on the ground. While naval leads in space. Former Head of Janitorial | HCZ man geer | lvl 70 life wizard | Roblox Clothing Designer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhenixBoy300 Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 10 hours ago, borith said: -support Naval end up on the field to help lead you guys so they need it for defensive purposes. That's what shock is for though, Navel is only there to lead the troops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokin Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 11 minutes ago, PhenixBoy300 said: That's what shock is for though, Navel is only there to lead the troops Actually, not to be rude but The Imperial Navy took 0% control in the field it was left for the Commanders and Officers. Fleet keep the ISD's in shape in the bridge they have no other purpose they're not Helmets and Guns they're hats and coats meaning they stay away from Frontal Combat and would 100% stay in a HQ or FOB. Retired 69th Commander Bear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhenixBoy300 Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 5 minutes ago, Smokin said: Actually, not to be rude but The Imperial Navy took 0% control in the field it was left for the Commanders and Officers. Fleet keep the ISD's in shape in the bridge they have no other purpose they're not Helmets and Guns they're hats and coats meaning they stay away from Frontal Combat and would 100% stay in a HQ or FOB. Well we can't play on 2 maps at the same time, so navy take command Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokin Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 5 minutes ago, PhenixBoy300 said: Well we can't play on 2 maps at the same time, so navy take command We play on many more than 2, it just depends on the GM running the event. That's how naval run they're weak no armor, only side-arms doesn't do well in the field would die to quick. This is why they would stay in an armored base away from the attack Retired 69th Commander Bear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Elapin Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 -/+ support You can take away that assault rifle but we should have like a strong pistol and shotgun like the hunters shotgun, both are small weapons but pack a punch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffe Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 Okay so then all naval should get equivalent ranks in any battalion they want so they can use it on the field meaning Pentagon would be another General and I would be a BG, along with the rest of the Naval getting officer ranks in a battalion of their choosing, since we would have no way to play during events. The server is for FUN over complete realism, you wouldnt see Palpatine in an attack against a minor rebel base would you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matricies Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 (edited) Hello Phenix, So realistically, Naval problely wouldn't be on the battlefield with troops but operating safely on the ship or in highly defended location. But this server is meant to encourage a fun roleplay environment, so by taking the guns away you do mess with their abilities a bit. But at the same time, that also means Naval gets to take the job of other battalions who are supposed to be the foot soldiers. I myself am not sure what the correct answer to this would be as its an issue revolving around player experience on the server. Naval having heavy guns does not really affect the other battalions too much but it is kinda silly from roleplay perspective. Also regarding leadership, I do feel Naval should be managing from upper echelons and delegating on-field tasks to officers/NCO of their respective battalion, so that..You know the officers/NCOs can actually lead their men on the battle field and report back to highest Naval officers. This way, we have a proper chain of command active. +/- support due to the reasons above. Edited September 18, 2019 by Matricies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 On 9/17/2019 at 10:57 PM, [GL] Elapin said: -/+ support You can take away that assault rifle but we should have like a strong pistol and shotgun like the hunters shotgun, both are small weapons but pack a punch. Ender | Former SWAT Lieutenant | Senior Low Command | SWAT FTO | Previous PoliceRP Administrator COL Will 1L52 to admins: Max, you ain't going to scare them, you are on a female model and stuttering... "So what're you doing?" - @SWAT LT Ender 22-D "Putting my clothes back on". - @SWAT SFC Nao 27-D "There's a fine line between right and wrong. And somewhere, in the shadows, they've sent us to find it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Alpha_ Posted September 19, 2019 Share Posted September 19, 2019 +Support Makes sense, Navy aren't meant for frontline at all and should have instead a blaster pistol for self defense. Former DHOS Current GENSEC LTCOL - Deputy Head Juggernaut - HIRU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hotshot Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 DENIED For now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts