Gaur

Retired Staff
  • Content Count

    1492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Gaur last won the day on November 26 2018

Gaur had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

187 Excellent

About Gaur

  • Rank
    Born from the Force
  • Birthday 03/11/2003

Recent Profile Visitors

5044 profile views
  1. I agree with your take, but when there is a report made and the excuse that there is "no clarification" then something needs to happen so that excuse cant be used in future situations. Snar said "While your concerns are understood by everyone, this issue is something that has never officially been clarified by myself or any SMT, and therefore it would be unfair to punish an SMT member for their actions when no clarification on the restrictions to those actions were present." I believe what this post is asking for is a public official clarification on what conduct is allowed and what conduct is not allowed so that the community knows whether or not to make an abuse report or bring it to Zeeptin.
  2. We already had a graveyard, but it was removed by SMT because of it "causes lag"
  3. I believe it to be more than necessary to have specific posted outlines or clarification to prevent confusion like this in the future. When I was a Manager for SWRP and HA on PRP there were no specific rules, it fell under "just use common sense." Having specific outlined rules would prevent unnecessary reports on SMT members and if they are reported the excuse that they had "no clarification" cannot be used to prevent punishment. Not having specific rules allows any SMT member to get off with the same excuse and a slap on the wrist. I'm not saying there need to be extensive guidelines, but there need to be some rules. If SMT does not wish to have rules then that needs to be stated that they don't have restrictions, if they do then it needs to be stated what they are and not hidden from the community.
  4. -Support Shouldnt be able to ban, maybe content moderate or post restriction.
  5. Gaur

    Weirdest SCP

    What do you think is the weirdest SCP? In my Opinion, SCP-2521 is one of the weirdest. SCP-2521 steals information about its self, so any written or verbally transmitted info about SCP-2521 will be stolen by him. If somone says somthing he will steal the person. Once he takes the person/information no one knows where they go. The only form of information about SCP-2521 that can be written is pictures. Link: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2521
  6. None of the GOI’s are good guys. Like stay out of the foundations way goddammit. It’s better for the world to live in ignorance then to be exposed to SCPS.
  7. Oh sorry My Bad. Just take 20$ off of the stuff so 110$-140$
  8. Base Job: $50 Add 3 Weapons: $60 (Camo, Tranq, Nova) Armor: $20 Extra HP: Idk? Cost: About 130$-160$ (Cause IDK about extra charges if any for the HP or camo)
  9. Should be back on today late or tomorrow!
  10. Name: Gaur/Dustin Rank: Dep Site Admin Reason for LOA: Need to focus on some school stuff due in 3 days, wont be on much. End 1/10/18
  11. Isn't necessary any more restraints regenerate over time.
  12. MTF Update already planned
  13. Gaur

    SCP-999 Test

    <Security Clearance Level 1 Required…> <Validating Credentials…> <Validated…> Secure. Contain. Protect. Fireproof experiment with SCP-999 SCP-999 is made of a gelatinous mass of translucent orange slime. This slime is seemingly resistant to fire and burn. A sample was taken from SCP-999. The procedures were... Take sample from 999. Take a D-Class to the incinerator room. Rub a thin layer of the sample from 999 over the Class-D. Ignite Incenerator. Record Results The Results were pretty underwhelming. The thin layer seemed to have little to no effect on the Class-D survivability as the Class-D caught fire immediately. All that was left was a pile of ash. The experiment was a failure to test further I would require approval from the ethics committee as well as site administration as I cannot take a large portion of SCP-999 without proper authorization. As well as I cannot burn D-Class over and over without the ethics committee getting angry. <RESEARCH REPORT OVER...> ------ OOC REPORT Lore Name: Burk Rank: Jr. Researcher Clearance Level: 1 List of personnel involved in testing: N/A Level D personnel involved: D-9231 SCP: 999 Hypothesis: If a layer of SCP-999's goop is applied to a Class-D then he will have a slight resistance to fire. Observation: The D-Class burned immediately. Visual Stimuli (Photos/videos): Check Incenerator Camlog (N/A) Errors and/or safety hazards: None Conclusion: Experiment is a failure. Would need more 999 goop to test. Requires approval.
  14. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1siwsmF8A0RgKdKt3WpRbGP8msY8xseZXBOChLLKUIyY/edit?usp=sharing