[General Suggestion - Nerf the Khovostov 7G-0X]

-Support
Cyclone, I'm going to keep it 100 and say that this nerf is not really needed. Allow me to explain.

I know it's going to sound biased because of me being in D5 but I just want to get this out. This gun only belongs to 1 class and 3 people having it. And for clarification it's the no land beyond that made it do the damage it was doing because of its exotic perk which grants the user a damage buff for a brief amount of time to their next target meaning one, not multiple. Second You should to take into consideration of how often we have one of our HCMD members on and how often they play.

Who would this change mostly benefit? - "Everyone going against this gun in a fight." Now I can understand going 1 on 1 or maybe a squad. But consider your numbers you all usually get. This shouldn't be an issue. Not to mention how well equipped your guys classes are. You are on one of the best SF job's on the server and you're saying it's ruining player combat? If this were to be nerfed it would just ruin the combat experience for them when the commander of an MTF branch is weaker than a CI SF. The khovostov does 16.4 with armor and the ACOG does 23.3 with armor and yes this was tested earlier in-game and with the footage cyclone provided. It's pretty hypocritical suggestion to be honest.

[Peak Staff Application - Denied]

-Support
I hate to stack onto this but I also do not know who you are.

Application is a bit lack-luster. Wish it had some more depth into the questions specifically. 

I'm not going to mention your forum account activity because it would be hypocritical but it should definitely be brought up.

Overall I think you should definitely get more acquainted with the server and the forums, make a name for yourself and make another application if this one's denied. I would definitely like to know you  more and see you around on the server!

[SCP-173 and SCP-999 cross test]

 

Lore Name: Harrison | Shadows

Rank:  Associate Researcher(s)
 

SCP’s: SCP-173/SCP-999
 

Question / Idea:
Could SCP-999’s affect SCP-173 in a positive manner and would SCP-173 afflict any harm to SCP-999?

Background Research:
SCP-173 is known to be very hostile when eye contact has been removed and will kill it’s victims by snapping their neck at the base of their skull. SCP-999 is known to improve the happiness of the person or creature it’s with. This has been proven via cross testing with 682 and in 999’s general test logs. Review 999-1-A for more information.

Hypothesis: SCP-173 would inflict similar damage to 999 in the way 173 kills its victims? And would 999 affect 173 in any way? Such as hostility.
 

Observations (What Happened During Test): The following data release has been approved by the following researchers: RS Tyler and ☐☐☐☐. Experiment log T-98725-ARAR999/173: Date: ◼/◼/◼◼: Items: SCP-999 Tissue test record: N/A. SCP 173 Tissue test record: N/A overridden by research command.
Test log: SCP-999 was introduced into the containment area of 173. SCP-999 begins to whimper and press itself against the blast door of 173’s containment chamber. All eye contact and direct video feed was cut and the familiar sound of scraping concrete can be heard within the containment chamber. 5 minutes later, once direct eye contact with 173 was established, one security guard removed SCP-999 from the test chamber. SCP-999 immediately returned to its normal state and appeared to have no types of wounds or markings from 173.

NOTES: After review, It appears that SCP-173 made no attempts to injure SCP-999. It’s like he had no interest and continued to perform it’s natural habits. We believe further testing is required before we can get a definitive answer on why this occurred.
 

Evidence/Visual Stimuli: Once direct eye contact was re-established with SCP-173, SCP-999 was seen hugging the blast chamber door and made whimpering noises indicating emotional distress from SCP-173’s presence. SCP-173 took no interest in SCP-999, reason as to why it is currently in review.
 

Was Your Hypothesis Correct?: Yes

Audio log: N/A I gave up trying to figure out how to upload it after 30 minutes 

 

[SS1's - Trial Moderator Application- Accepted]

+ support
Incredibly good person.
Wonderfully written application.
Though you haven't been here long enough I believe that won't be an issue for long.
Wish you the best of luck!