Jump to content

1stSavagerY

Member
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1stSavagerY

  1. +/- support i dunno how to feel about removing the spartan model, being able to change colors is one of the most fun things about HSU. that plus the name change for HSU is already a pre-established MTF unit, it would’ve been a little better to create something new so there’s no contradicting pre-established lore. especially since alpha 4’s name is “Pony Express”…… other than that everything else looks amazing EDIT: +support we had no way with masbster chef model and an HTF is different from an MTF so we in fact wouldnt be named after pony express :))
  2. +/- support cool new models, but that hotshot model is already being used on behemoth from Nu7 and i think also the quartermaster, other than that having new models for CI would be pretty cool! update: +support; they clarified they’re not using the MTF model
  3. +support YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
  4. huuuge -support sarkic can already kill people during negotiations so having ci or mtf be able to cross each other is not needed + the fact that if this was added no one would ever want to negotiate as it would be more effort than it's worth
  5. +support gold golf clubs have seriously tipped the balance of fights and should be balanced out with guns doing more damage
  6. As there are no neutral CC's, and the Rho 36 CC's are MTF cc's and therefore follow MTF rules, he should've been engaged or ran away from them. In the video I will link below, it will show briefly show that he was following the CI. And as only 1 person had their gun on him at any given time, he was not considered to be under any failrp, as well as the fact as he didn't let anyone else know that there was CI which I can show via chat logs if needed as I do have screenshots of that as well. I would also like to add that when I explained what happened in the call I was in, both Glados and soul advised me that I should warn Thin for FailRP as the Rho 36 CC's are MTF combatant CC's. Here is the video proof of it all (as you can see, I initially thought it was teaming but I was advised by both staff in the call that it would be a FailRP warn that I should give him): I would also like to mention that thin is telling them to brainwash him in chat as I spectate this happening, which is FailRP https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/72641468/d1337ZCn6ZPz?invite=cr-MSxDSUcsMjg3ODQ5Nyw I will be editing this comment as people respond Sawrunner: 1) I was flying around as that's generally encouraged for staff to do, I was not following them around and wasn't even aware that CI were raiding when I stumbled on them, the only thing I said that entire time was in chat saying "why are you teaming." I saw something that shouldn't have happened, and acted on that. 2) As thin has many many previous warnings for FailRP, he should know better to not do this
  7. Im gonna miss you buddy, I hope you join us again in the future
  8. It really isn’t tbh, and I think that the rules should definitely be expanded upon, especially on topics like this as there is no clear line or rule stating what cannot or can be done. It would honestly do more good to have the rule clarified as a single player report inevitably lead to nothing being done, regardless of the outcome. the only major issue i had is that you had arrested me and didn’t even stop to ask why i had left said door open, as I did have a reason and i had gotten distracted with talking to people over teamspeak, and all of this could’ve been avoided if both of us had communicated that better, which I was at fault to as well.
  9. 1) You could very obviously tell I was joking by my tone, along with the fact that I went over and closed the door before he had even cuffed me, he continued to do so even after the door was closed. I had counted almost a second and a half between the time I had closed the door and the time 912 pulled out his handcuffs. The fact that I went and closed the door anyways should've been obvious enough, so continuing to arrest someone with Level 4 Clearance after closing said door would be considered going against the foundation, as the cuffs hadn't been taken out until after the door had closed. 2) Lots of people leave some doors open so they're able to have a ranged advantage over D-Class, SCP's, or CI, this was no different, and although the SOP states to close doors just in general, there's nothing preventing someone to keep open a door for a short time so that that individual can use the longer hallways as a tactical advantage, which most people (both on CI and MTF) do. 3) There was a staff in the TS when this happened, heard it all go down, and was stating how cuffing someone for something like leaving a door open, which again isn't specifically isn't in the MOTD, is cuff-minging 4) The MOTD doesn't specifically state whether or not "event" means an event from a member of the Event Team or events as in "event; noun; a thing that happens," or more specifically, the flow of events that occur. 5) The MOTD doesn't state rulebreakers as in SOP rulebreaks, which is managed by the MTF/Gensec branch itself, not an SCP. 6) To the best of my knowledge, 912 has no clearance level, and in fact follows Gensec/MTF orders, not ordering Level 4+ clearance personnel around. Therefore, if I have an reason within the RP to keep a door open, I'm allowed to do so (with the knowledge that I will close it sometime in the near future (ex: a minute or two). 7) Classes like quartermaster still fall under the Nu7 SOP, and last I checked (which was under a minute ago) there was nothing in the Nu7 SOP that allowed 912 to order personnel or SF around.
  10. Your In-Game Name: 1stSavagerY Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:106502723 Players In-Game Name: Phil Players SteamID: STEAM_0:0:86507562 Date: 11/9/2021 Time: Around 12:40-1:30 More information and what should be done: As I was obviously joking and went and closed the door anyways after saying "I don't care", along with the fact that 912 can only arrest gensec/mtf who are rulebreaking, and forgetting something in the SOP is not an MOTD rulebreak, 912 is not able to enforce this. Moreover, he was going against MTF orders even though in the MOTD says "SCP-912 must comply with any orders given to it by GENSEC or MTF personnel." Not only that, but it also clearly states that "Intentionally interrupting, minging, ruining, or disrupting events is prohibited," which cuff-minging would fall under as it's a form of minging. Although I do admit that we were trying to cuff him as well, which is not allowed, this was more due to the fact that he started to arrest others. Because of these clear rule violations, I think that the offender should be warned. Evidence: https://medal.tv/clips/70974612/d13377vZAlM6?invite=cr-MSxrWkQsMjg3ODQ5Nyw
  11. +support I've given him a verbal for talking about topics he shouldn't in ooc and for player diss, giving him the benefit of the doubt. But after this incident something definitely has to be done about his lack of regard for other people and for the rules
  12. that's very obviously a joke. especially on a *semi*-serious scprp server, i dont understand how this comment can be taken seriously. other than that, he's super chill and a nice guys so + support
  13. ~~faye you were literally combat healing him~~ I went back through everything and faye wasn’t failrping like i said earlier, i had been misinformed and led on to believe he was taking part until i remembered i personally escorted faye to medbay bunks from medbay cp as 682 had been chasing him. faye was indeed NOT combat healing him and not at fault here. unless someone else got proof otherwise, i’m pretty sure faye is in the clear (as i think faye was mentioned in the other complaint)
  14. I was here during this, it was super annoying because faye and draven were also healing 682 during the whole thing edit: it was t0ste and draven teaming with 682, i was with faye most of the time i was in LCZ and he was helping me with 682, from his vids he was engaged against 682, i think there might have been a mix up with the names of the people involved
  15. +support I understand his frustration, but the fact that he chose to deliberately not do anything about the report and his previous infractions speak for themselves. I also would like to share this picture of something he said in game just a little earlier:
×
×
  • Create New...