Eyelander

Overall Grade: 90/100 Good format Very long and detailed description of what happened Great use of background research Some poor wording at certain points

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zRo3Al_KJs-bY8gtikNAHUyvb6bleHMVjIefD8zHLl8/edit

-Support -Removed from E11 -Entry level position in all branches -"Site Director" is not an O5 member -RRH is not just something you try out, and it is not a position that you should seek just to be respected. -RRH Analyst Oscar 12

+/-Support, leaning - +Great command member -Only 2 linked test logs -Doesn't really answer questions, mostly just rambling -RRH Analyst Oscar 12

Overall Grade: 85/100 Great format Long Pretty creative, 7101 tests are kind of infrequent Good use of redaction A few typos

80/100 Good format Pretty long log Very descriptive in it's observations Small errors in grammar Background research is copied off of the SCP wiki

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n5onT0zeMv8PTkIK1XB8Q110JASs0ovyKBZMQSvwmR8/edit

55/100 Includes a good amount of details Quite hard to read Not much spacing Some small spelling errors here and there A bit short

+Support

+Support but -Support on the monke part i don't see why it needs to get removed

Overall Grade: 70/100 While I do very much appreciate the concept of this this test, there are a few problems. The audio log was a bit weird, I am confused as to why 173 is saying what is happening at the moment, and there are some instances of grammatical errors or weird wording. The format is pretty good, which isn't surprising considering the fact that it's just the RnD sample format. Other than that, pretty good test!

-RRH Analyst Oscar 12

-Support Sarkics are meant to raid, not to mine. Plus it would make surface mining way too easy and exploitable.

-MTF Alpha-1 Analyst Oscar-12

+Support -Very active -Experienced -dedicated -overall good guy -MTF Alpha-1 Analyst "Oscar-12"

Grade: 97/100 Pros: +Nice format +A lot of background information about prior expeditions, the personnel involved, the suits used, etc. +Very lengthy test +Creative +Good use of redaction Cons: -Some small typos here and there

Grade: 95/100 Pros: +Pretty long test +Great format +Very creative, what with making a whole new SCP for this Cons: -A bit wordy at certain times

In Game Name: Eyelander Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:17548125 Job Applying for: O5 Research Warns: 0 Why would you like to join?: I am interested in joining O5 Research for one main cause: Limitations. In general, several research jobs are very limited. What I'm interested in in O5 Research is the lower amount of restrictions. With these lower amounts of limitations, I will have much more room to apply myself, in my tests and in other things, too. Why should we accept you?: I should be accepted into O5 Research because I am fairly experienced and active in the Research branch. I'll usually be on research for a few hours every day, and I've been in the branch for more than 3 months now. In addition, I also excel in my field, making high-effort and high-quality test logs consistently, around once a week.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C5pmco1K99F8H-iob0NWuDC0KPE0CuvIeBCvuTZ-HVk/edit?usp=sharing <Swaws>

+Support

+Support

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oHcj4_cSJdqxpfaiI2PRcUZ7oae0Q7ctGAHUqYV0QqY/edit?usp=sharing <Only click if have swag>

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1frB9egZ6nH0imKUcHtJmTi7BLC8JCYzmte794GwHqiI/edit

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aaJAYeBO40FNVkCm1iSojXm484xy1jlZc3PZKGSzv1E/edit?usp=sharing