Jump to content

Tactical Ten Year Old

Member
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Tactical Ten Year Old

Recent Profile Visitors

850 profile views

Tactical Ten Year Old's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • Dedicated
  • One Year In
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. +support fair implementation could be a system where the more members a family has the more their warning cap is. Once that cap is reached the family will be forcefully disbanded. Warnings will reset after any amount of months are are appealable. If members of a family are permanently removed that members warnings will leave with them. family warns will only be added if the person who is the cause of the warn has the family tag in their name at the time of the offense. If valid video only evidence of a family member is shown of the member breaking server rules or making the server a hostile and unfun roleplay enviroment is shown SMT can decide to strike the family. This will also encourage people to make more reports which hopefully will lead to a overall crackdown on rule breakage.
  2. +support I genuinely have only seen this person patrolling on job 3 times in total and I've been on the server everyday for a MONTH, They could be in a different timezone but I do not believe that is the case. I mean you clearly have the capacity to learn so i think you should be able to soak up wisdom from other people on the captain job goodluck!
  3. +support - I have seen him working closely with high command to better the department and explore his authority and command - Communicates with lower ranking officers and is a reliable member of command. - the only - is that hes on SCO a little too much for my liking rather then PD but that's fine
  4. yoooo lets gooooo come out of retirement to promote me
  5. +support -seems to have turned his behavior around from his 22 warns
  6. should i apply for lance corporal
  7. just to clarify for people since this is extremely important. the actual rule I was accused of breaking was prop climbing. due to me building OVER ss walls. The screenshot I posted of the bridge shows it very clearly under 2 of the fences. it was so far under its out of crouch jump range. Due to the fact that im nervous this isint allowed unless important (though i cant find were thats stated) im going to stop replying to this post so that i do not get punished!
  8. https://gyazo.com/12a8ddbc27cb7512b24c78f0f97fe369
  9. apologies if this isint allowed but you never told me you were gonna jail me not that this has anything to do with the post. i took the warn for that because i technically did run from the sit unintentional or not.
  10. -support 40 warns mistakes happen glad drippy caught it! dont get discouraged!
  11. Toast STEAM_0:0:245885721 The admin's name in-game: Snuts The admin's steam name (If you know it): GL Snuts Prop Climb/Prop minge Why do you think this warn was false: Basically a admin (ill only reveal the name if its relevant to the appeal) told me I could build a ramp if its supported to the top of a building as long as its not removed when I finish climbing. I did that. SS built props around my fence so i went across the street from ss and built a supported bridge under there wall UNDER! snuts saw this and proceeded to warn me for prop minge because I was building over there wall. He refused to look at any of my evidence that it was infact under the wall. (he instantly deleted it) I will be providing screenshots of the position of the bridge to show it being under the wall. Any extra information: For those of you who will say: it was prop climb to have it there in the first place, I was told by a staff member that it was fine as long as I didn't climb and delete it! It was a admin as well! I was only warned due to "it being built over ss walls.| First Picture is me on the supported bridhe with it under the ss walls: ALSO IF THIS SHOWS UP AS EDITIED I ACCIDENTALLY POSTED THE FORMAT! (i think i did atleast) I pressed the back arrow and comeback without the edit button and reason so i think I'm good
  12. Jack Ruby Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:245885721 The admin's name in-game: Trumpo The admin's steam name (If you know it): Breaking Priority Rules. Evidence of the warn (RE Why do you think this warn was false: I was in a vehicle race with 3 other people. A tac member attempted to pull me over from maybe 3 blocks away but I didint stop due to the fact that my car was significantly faster then his and he was not catching up. I was also again racing. He then reported me for not pulling over. Priority rules state if you have a valid roleplay reason you can run from the police. Trumpo told me multiple times that I have to fit one of the example reasons listed under priority rules. This is untrue. the MOTD clearly states: "This includes but is not limited to" then list the example reasons for running. Being in a ILLEGAL street race is 100% a valid reason to run from the police especially since that is a arrest able offense. Any extra information:
  13. +support Hes been very helpful and caring while on his SM job and I'm fully confident he can do that on swat as well. Also very active.
×
×
  • Create New...