APE

Member
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About APE

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Name: APE Rank: SM FTO Rank (If Applicable, SGT+): JFTO Why should you retain your rank (WO+ must respond | 150+ words):  Any Notes, Questions, or Concerns?: Nope
  2. 200 vs 280. In my case. The issue is there shouldn’t need to be a transfer of such large amounts of money to simply continue playing on a class that you are active as hell on. I have 4 people that play my class for hours each day and our owner still accepts additions to our class. We have no reason to change ownership because he still moderates the class even though he can’t play on it rn.
  3. +Support The people who still play and add onto the CC shouldn’t have their slots removed all because their owner can’t play. If the owner is still capable of accepting additions to the CC, there should be no removal of the cc. Generally speaking, the owner of the CC let those who use it onto the class in the first place. So it would be against the owners desire to have people that paid to join their class get kicked off of it all because they aren’t playing.
  4. APE

    MP7 Fire Rate

    The MP7 has an odd glitch that occurs sometimes and can last for hours or even multiple days. The fire rate (950 RPM) sometimes gets as low as 500 RPM and stays that way for hours. It seems to be fixed after most resets but when it does lose its fire rate it becomes practically useless, as it only does 20 damage and without a fast fire rate, it can’t kill anything.
  5. So what’s the situation lol. If y’all are still talking about it, it’s fine. Just want to know if our fight is a done deal or not lmaoo
  6. Ummm yeah. The bribe wasn’t a bribe? As nothing was exchanged and it was a joke?? I’m allowed to advertise it, therefore it shows people where to go to find it on the forums and also lets forum users know that there is an option to do so if they choose to read and support it. Costco agreed with me on everything and I asked him to +support it, he was away from his computer and I told him to get up and do it. Nothing was exchanged between the two of us besides words lmao, there was no product. You’re trynna make it seem like I did something wrong by joking around about giving him diving knives if he hurried up and Got off his butt lmao. But like, nice try? Don’t know what you wanted to get out of that. I know that sherlock and Watson are cool and all, but making it seem like someone was actually compensated for this is a foul way to try and cosplay as them. Anyone who thinks that someone would pay them to get off the couch and walk to their computer to do something they would do in time, needs to get a better idea of realism.
  7. Lmao, mb. It was a bit jumbled. I’m saying that when referring to enlisted and such, the hammer is so over hyped and made such a big deal of that even if it is weaker, they’ll still ask for another nerf.
  8. Stabby is a player who dedicated himself to the server and does a good job holding power positions in Gensec. However he has only been here for a little over a month. He is perfect for a moderator role, but I think he should just spend more time here and get to know the community in and out.
  9. What makes me confused is that if this somehow manages to pass. Let’s say it becomes like the scythe. Nobody complains about scythe anymore, not at all. Just because it looks like the hammer, folks will whine. If it gets boosted to do as much as the bat, which it should be considering it’s a SLEDGEHAMMER and you can buy the bat at anytime, whilst this item was limited. People will still complain even though it would be a bat with a hammer skin lol. It’s all meaningless hate if that happens.
  10. Once again dude. We aren’t making it what it used to be. It used to be able to one shot enlisted. We are suggesting that either we make it as fast as the scythe, which is a stronger weapon, or increase its damage enough that it will not one hit an officer, but still pack more of a punch than 80. As it’s a sledgehammer and does 80 damage, compared to the bat which does 120. I’ll say it again, the bat is also a two shot weapon, and that’s what we’re planning to make the hammer. What is there to object to? We’re making a weapon that cost more than the bat, do the same as the bat.
  11. But you aren’t a current security anymore. So you wouldn’t know Jack about the current state of DBLOCK. If you took the time to read, you’d notice several Security command including Majors and Captains, as well as 5 Sargent Majors all in support of changing the hammer. The fact that so many security with strong power in their branch support a change is proof enough against the “security bane” argument. Please Dont tell anyone to “not support this”. That gets in the way of true discussion about the issues people have regarding this collectible because everything you said is senseless and doesn’t relate to the ongoing debate at all. Even the MTF command is plus supporting this, get real. “It was our bane” lmao, ok. We aren’t making the hammer as good as it used to. If anything it will be the same as scythe, or be a 2 shot on enlisted just like the bat. Sorry for my harshness, but it annoys me when people don’t even talk about the ongoing discussion and just pop in with broad statements. Read the discussion before you comment please.
  12. Lmao, a lot of people don’t think the hammer should be so weak I guess.
  13. My bad lol. This is my first post in any gaming forum so I’m still not all exactly sure on how this kind of things operates lol. I’m still working on it.