Jump to content

Some Weeb

Member
  • Posts

    2,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Some Weeb last won the day on May 15 2023

Some Weeb had the most liked content!

About Some Weeb

  • Birthday 07/31/2005

Recent Profile Visitors

6,848 profile views

Some Weeb's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Dedicated
  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Year In
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. The proper one is 'snugums' +Support Redacted is decent and definitely more capable then other people
  2. Huh okay that makes sense then. We never had that as a rule in the old eoi so I never thought that was a must but yeah makes more sense now. -Support
  3. +/- Traditionally and this has been the case for a while, when trying to justify self defense it has been on a case by case basis. Example: A maintenance can shoot back at a CI that tries to shoot him but that doesn't satisfy him going ballistic on all CI. In this case 1 guy opened fire, he got shit on then you are no longer in fear. It's really stupid so I DONT THINK YOU SHOULD'VE BEEN WARNED however..
  4. Cringe asf +/- The report itself is no good, researchers/gensec have always been KoS for surface so there is literally no argument here, it doesn't matter his reasoning for killing him all L2/L3 research and gensec alike are KOS anyways. The part that pissed me off is the camping that's some dick head type shit right there and only shows laziness and stupidity on your part. TLDR warn for puppy guarding or (maybe) metagame idk if that's what is constituted if someone is camping eoi
  5. +Support Really busted lmao, I was getting 30-50 kill raids as a a cloaker. That's a whole Lotta NLR.
  6. +/- Extreme lack of experience which makes me highly skeptical of this application. I've seen good work from u but this is a new branch which will need someone experienced to run. Which I dont see in u. However, there are many positive contributing factors so Ill settle for neutral.
  7. +Support Okay this is getting ridiculous, just because a person interprets something as another thing doesn't mean that thing becomes true. I've cracked jokes like this before and I am not trying to shit on the black race either. Sack up or get off the internet.
  8. +Support Dudes a rlly cool guy and would've been a rlly cool general if Icefuse MRP wasn't full of a bunch of brain dead baboons in management. @Clarkieyou are the worst 75thRG XO - Love, DEVGRU BSL Weeb
  9. +Support Dude it's stupid to not promote someone and not to tell them. That I literally wasting their time and making them have false hopes thats fucking ridiculous. The idea of a SDNP and DNI where someone doesn't even know what they did wrong and it keeps them from progressing is down right foolish and immature concept on both fronts. Now of course I am open to other opinions but every SF I have led and joined don't do SDNPs or DNIs because of how childish it is. Like pretending someone is your friend then talking shit behind their back imo.
  10. So your rational is, if I capture him no matter what happens irl he needs to be in game? If I see right he also says he told you so, which means he signaled earlier he'd have to leave. I need more context on this cause this seems to sketch, I hear that he just left outta nowhere yet observe him say he told you so in chat. @Grub(i think this is the right one) +/-
  11. Good leader, good person and amazing person to have around.
  12. I am honestly laughing at the really terrible attempt to try and act like there is nothing wrong with this CC. +Support You can't make rules that's SMT, your rules have never been formally acknowledged so don't mean shiet. Also, yall don't RP that's just a plain fuckin lie. Someone gives you money and you do what they tell you. There is nothing RP about that. Butchered black ops and made nobody annoying as hell for everyone. We are on a roll people!
  13. +Support overall Though I am just gonna say it's fuckin stupid to make Foxtrot Lead High Comm picked solely. It worked horrendously with A1 don't think we should repeat the same mistakes. At that point it might as well be glorified SF.
  14. It wouldn't be a complaint or report. What I am referencing is what I believe to be a fundamental issue with how the structure of SCP RP is. If I was to make any sort of formal movement it would be more like a suggestion which would be (complete) reorganization of command. In other words highly unlikely to go anywhere.
×
×
  • Create New...