Jump to content

starr

Member
  • Posts

    607
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

starr last won the day on July 15 2023

starr had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About starr

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

starr's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

42

Reputation

  1. starr

    One last time

    Mutes always sketch me out, but you were chill, good luck in life bro, I know how hellish it can get
  2. Sheesh, came back from the dead just to watch all these people retire, goes crazy
  3. Don't think this is a suggestion thing, nonetheless I would say -support cause Nu-7's priority is the facility internals, and if E-11 need help I don't see why they wouldn't just be able to ask
  4. +support Making the drug system viable outside of burst needs
  5. What are you suggesting? - Include in the rules for engagement of non-combatants for CI that "Non-combatants can be captured/killed if interfering with CI themselves and/or their goals." (EX: If a maintenance member were to clearly call out CI while they're running by, the maintenance member would be eligible to termination from the CI members.) How would this change better the server? - It would actually encourage the scary feeling of CI raiding, meanwhile now it seems like a cartoonish mexican standoff where if there's no E4 you can just stand there and mess with CI as much as possible without punishment. Not only including them on more teamwork and possible RP for the Foundation, but it also monitors any mingy non-combatant(s) that may simply just use the invulnerability to indirectly and/or directly mess up a raid either lightly or majorly. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - May have the effect of causing more kills towards non-combatants, however when given up to possible staff in a sit area, can be settled and corrected. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Hopefully both CI and Foundation. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A
  6. I'd rather wait for Don's response here, I don't take him as a person to do this unmotivated and I personally believe there's a missing piece of the puzzle, so until then +/- support
  7. -support Personal preference, but I would rather less weapons in the armory so we can have more of these weapons equipped and balanced for specialty jobs or branches in general.
  8. +support The foundation of the cloaker jobs is the problem, that includes the swep being a major player, getting this done would fix a hell of a lot of the issues to start with
  9. shit bro u better be around for l4d2 cause I need to kick Infected's ass more often with you and fool
  10. Spray didn't know of this rule, while useful it doesn't excuse his reasoning of why, this doesn't validate his actions, though I'd like to mention it still does nothing since most people would try to ask and RP it out anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...