-
Posts
551 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Important Post
GMod Tutorials
Knowledge Base
Posts posted by GLaDOS
-
-
Denied
You may reapply at a later date. -
Denied
You may reapply at a later date. -
Denied
You may reapply at a later date. -
Accepted!
Contact High Command for Debrief.-
3
-
-
Accepted!
Contact High Command for Debrief. -
Accepted!
Contact High Command for Debrief. -
Associate Researchers+ are required to reply to this post.
Failure to respond will result in removal.
Roll-call submissions are due by 10/31/21Format (Copy & Paste Below);
Lore Name:
Steam ID:
Rank:
Activity Level: -
Can confirm, I'm square brain.
+support-
3
-
1
-
-
It's always been a pleasure Tomato.
Hope you stick around, and you'll be welcomed back anytime!
Take care friend! -
G'day!
It seems you've posted your test log in the wrong forums section.
The one you want would be here; https://gaminglight.com/forums/forum/521-foundation-test-logs/
Test logs posted here are usually disregarded or not looked at.
Posting them in the Foundation Test Logs section, gives you the ability to receive a grade and recognition from Research Command.
Your log looks great, and I wouldn't want it to without recognition.
Good job! -
Applications are to be their own separate forums post under the Research section of the forums, following the format below.
The title of your thread should be "<Your Name>'s Junior Command Application"
Only Senior Researchers and above are to apply for Junior Command.
You may only apply when a position for Junior Command is currently available, otherwise you may be denied!
Good Luck to All Applicants!Application Format;
Name:
SteamID:
Current Rank:Time in Research (Estimate):
Why do you believe you should be in Research Command?(100 word requirement):
What can you bring to the table that others can't? (100 word requirement):
What would you do to better Research and increase activity? (100 word requirement):
-
Awww man!
How am I supposed to get my beautiful maintainance rp now? -
And thus we've lost another one.
Ape, as much as I interacted with you, which wasn't very much, you were always such a pleasure to be around.
In and out of security, you were such an amazing person, and I'm glad having met you.
I wish you the best in all that is set before you! Take care my friend! -
Have Fun!
-
Accepted!
Come Speak to any SCMD+ For your Whitelist and Debrief!
-
o7 nerd :_(
-
1
-
-
Accepted
Please talk to an Senior Event Team+ to recieve your training.
-
Denied
You may reapply in 2 weeks.
-
Denied
You may reapply in 2 weeks.
-
You are an amazing person Mitchell!
I hope you take care of yourself man! o7 -
This dude was around longer than I have been in research.
Many have come and go in the presence of this guy, and I am sad to see him go.
You were amazing Slurmp, God Speed o7. -
You were always a fun person to be around.
Hope you stick around a bit, we can play siege anytime, so I can watch you whiff horribly and die
-
1
-
-
Damnit man.
Didn't expect this from you so soon.
You were a brilliant and fun person to be around.
Many things on this server, would not be the way they are today without you're helpful insight.
It's a shame to see you go so soon.
Do me a favor and stick around will ya? I've heard Research is demanding... Paychecks... -
Roll Call End
MazuzaM - TrialMod Report
in Archive
Posted
After reviewing the evidence, it is of my belief that the Trial Moderator acted up to Staff Team standards during the sit. Trial-Moderators need time to learn the ropes, not everyone can be a shining example of the Staff Team directly after applying. Not only so, but this report seems very nit-picky to me as this really shouldn't have been this big of an issue as it has become. After watching the evidence provided by MazuzaM, It clearly looks like your intent is to breach an offline SCP, keep in mind that is a common occurrence during off-hours. Not to mention the copy and paste of your console isn't really a valid evidence, as text such as that can be edited very easily.
Overall, -Support.