Dr. Ternith Plague

Lore - 15/15 [10 points for entity lore] [5 points for test result accuracy based on lore] The main points gathered from the test: 096 was accurately represented, 035 was accurately represented (in best capability to GamingLight lore). 035 'killed' 096 and he was brought back to the chamber and came back to life. I'd say lore accuracy and test accuracy is rather accurate. Length - 20/20 [15 points for page length with no filler] [5 points for photos] You have test photos, and from what I see, there is no filler. No reason to take points here. Creativity - 15/15 [15 points for original test] [1 point taken for every other test with same hypothesis (within 6 months of posting)] Nothing seems out of the ordinary here! No one has had a similar test idea within 6 months so you should be good. Grammar - 29.5/30 [Default 30 points for grammar] [.5 points taken for 1 grammar mistake] Went through this with Grammarly - most of it was hyphens and nitpicking, but there was one misspelling mistake and one which I debated about taking off, but didn't since the message was still conveyed clearly (on instead of about), but otherwise, still good. Format - 19/20 [10 points for original format] [10 points for required information] You made your own format, so 10 points there. There's no dedicated section for stating your lore name in it, however you do put it in multiple times, so it's just one point taken off, just make sure to put it in for future tests. Otherwise, all good! Misc - 0/0 FINAL SCORE 98.5/100

ROA or LOA: LOA Name: Ternith Rank: Member Start Date: 12/14/2022 End Date: 12/25/2022 Reason: Burn out, also cutting close to Christmas with my college winter semester on my plate.

Lore - 15/15 (Does the document follow currently established GL/SCP lore?) Killing SCP-035 with sand is a really good idea. I couldn't think of that even if I tried, and using an AIC to monitor containment post-termination attempt is a great idea in of itself. Top score here. Length - 20/20 (For the test, is the document the appropriate length and is there major filler?) 13 pages? This is the longest document I've read so far, and this includes all the procedures and notes for 035 involving GamingLight and SCP in general. Great work on the length, no space was wasted! Creativity - 15/15 (Has the test been done before? If so, does it change circumstances or does it aim to corroborate previous test results?) Like I said - 035 killed with sand is such a unique idea that it hasn't been done before. And ensuring that a temporary task force was created was an even better idea. Good work. Grammar - 30/30 (Can the test be understood in a grammatical standpoint? Are there glaring grammatical or punctual errors?) Minimal grammar mistakes, if any. I don't see a reason for no max score. Even if there was any, it's surrounded by excellent grammar that I don't see a reason why you shouldn't get max score here. Format - 20/20 (Does the test meet the minimum required format to be graded? If not, is it replaced by an equally acceptable requirement?) This is the part where I look at the format and the basic format requirements. You not only added the required bits of information such as your name, the SCP in question, the idea and method, and ongoing details. But you also slammed down a stack of papers involving SCP-035 and your own addendums to be added. You even made a breach protocol in case he breached containment during testing! Misc - 1/0 (Does the person somehow go above and beyond in some form? If so, why?) God DAMN. I haven't given a misc point to any test excluding this one. This has such unique elements that I have no choice but to give a point here. God damn, good work. FINAL SCORE 101/100 I've never gushed over such a test log. I think it would go as far to be recommended for the Wanderer's Library. But, we'll see where that goes. Until then, I wish you good luck on further endeavors. ~ Research Asst. Supervisor, Ternith Plague

Lore - 15/15 (Does the document follow currently established GL/SCP lore?) The lore fits what we know about SCP-049's 'cure' and the 'pestilence'. Special Containment Procedures listed also make sense. Length - 20/20 (For the test, is the document the appropriate length and is there major filler?) Four page document, with most of the needed information attached. The only thing I could recommend is some pictures of the SCP in question, though the GIFs added quite a bit! Creativity - 10/15 (Has the test been done before? If so, does it change circumstances or does it aim to corroborate previous test results?) Interviews like this have been done before, asking SCP-049 for its origin, what the pestilence is, what the cure is, etc. I can't say its the most creative, but the questions were varied. Grammar - 27/30 (Can the test be understood in a grammatical standpoint? Are there glaring grammatical or punctual errors?) Only a few misspellings here or there, but nothing too bad. Format - 20/20 (Does the test meet the minimum required format to be graded? If not, is it replaced by an equally acceptable requirement?) This is a creative use of an entirely new format. It would be seen as an Audial/Visual Format, however, with SCP interviews, you can't exactly be 'visual' when the interview is entirely audial. Overall, liked the format and your own minor additions to it! Misc - 0/1 (Does the person somehow go above and beyond in some form? If so, why?) Not really any outstanding circumstances in this test to provide an extra point. FINAL SCORE 92/100 This was a nice test log to read. Very refreshing to go back to the basics, though not overall creative. I'm certain if you started writing a series of ideas down to brainstorm and get feedback from other researchers, you would do greatly. ~ Research Asst. Supervisor, Ternith Plague

-Support You might be asking... why -Support? Well, mostly server load. Same reason why I didn't like the PAC3 suggestion - this is just PAC3 with extra steps. Not that I don't like it, it'll just make the server lag to shit.

+Support ALLFATHER GIVE ME THE STRENGTH TO SLAY MY ENEMIES ON THE SITE-05 ELEVATOR! In all seriousness though, old sites were great to play on, just needs quite a bit of optimization before we consider it.

+Support Holy shit, the hell are y'alls heads going with this? I mean, I want more SCPs to test on but... god damn.

+Support SCP IS A HORROR FRANCHISE, SCARE ME MF'ER!

Other than format, +Support gimme more SCP to test on.

+Support Feed the addiction healthy activity

+Support Great idea! But don't forget the format.

+Support Not MTF myself other than RRH, but the additional card scan seems unnecessary.

+Support New players getting to the surface that just want to mine getting killed because they just happened to pass by E-11 base while going to diamond mines seems like quite the annoyance and would probably discourage escape gameplay other than for the CI training or XP.

This, but it's already shown with the 8286 SWEP so no need to worry about the RDM sit confusion part.

Through the dark we stand, in the light we fall https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lo29IRkQ0XAX9IdZr9FOXCtP-p7VWle4EFQ6UUykpys/edit?usp=sharing ~ Zeta-17

+Support Guy's got a lot of experience under his belt. Been seeing him around often. Very good choice.

From the context, it seemed to be in a sort of 'friendly manner' and not an outright insult. Lets stop the conversation here so we don't clog up the appeal.

- Support Whether the person banning/being offended was gay or not, it's still not okay and is against the harassment/disrespect rule. It's commonly taken in insulting contexts for things like that. Just wait out the time.

Honestly, I can see why at the time he was blacklisted from another MTF branch at the time, but now... Just seems unneeded. +Support Good luck, Wassabi.

I'd say do what was recommended earlier, and either deny/accept gifts or gift credits. Still +supporting but for a different reason listed here.

Accessing Log Grading system... Lore - 15/15 (Does the document follow currently established GL/SCP lore?) While unconventional, the hypothesis and lore relation do connect in some way. For example, you bring up that SCP-999 tasted like stale bread, which would make sense due to SCP-999's demeanor at the time. Length - 20/20 (For the test, is the document the appropriate length and is there major filler?) A four page document for an experiment such as this would definitely make sense, especially with visual stimuli being made available. Good work! Creativity - 12/15 (Has the test been done before? If so, does it change circumstances or does it aim to corroborate previous test results?) After searching through, a test similar to this was conducted before by "ItsSpeky". However, the test did not end the same way, and, to give credit where its due, it would make sense that SCP-999 would go from sadness after one time abuse to anger on two time abuse - candy or not. Grammar - 25/30 (Can the test be understood in a grammatical standpoint? Are there glaring grammatical or punctual errors?) Test had multiple capitalization errors throughout where they were not needed, otherwise, the test was well written and described. I could definitely understand what was going on. Format - 20/20 (Does the test meet the minimum required format to be graded? If not, is it replaced by an equally acceptable requirement?) Minimum format requirements were most definitely met, you added all that you could and made the document look good and understandable along the way. Definitely liked the black background with white text and usage of SCP logos at the beginning and end of documentation. Only thing I could recommend was to make the Foundation logos transparent and part of the background to make it look cooler, but you did well overall in this portion. Misc - 0/1 (Does the person somehow go above and beyond in some form? If so, why?) Not really any outstanding circumstances in this test to provide an extra point. FINAL SCORE 91/100 Good work. Keep it up, Drey. ~ Research Asst. Supervisor, Ternith Plague Logging out...

In Game Name: RAS Ternith Plague // Zeus.aic // Decrypt // Security LCPL Vytal Steam ID (Ex. STEAM_0:1:91255427): STEAM_0:1:234721838 Discord ID (Ex. Pinbal#5433): Dr. Ternith Plague#3343 Squadron you are Applying for (Guardian, Engineer, Analyst): Analyst Current RP Ranks Held: Research Assistant Supervisor (incl. Sentinel Unit + SLTR for RAU/RRA), Probationary Agent (RFA), Lance Corporal (Security) Has anyone recommended you to apply for the RRH program? (If not, it's fine): Yes - Whiskey 1 (Cryptonus) and Echo 39 (Cintal) If applying for Analyst please link notable test-logs here: SCP-079 "head-to-head" test with recently created AIC (Graded: 10/10) SCP-106 revised containment procedures relating from series of tests + background research (Ungraded) SCP-173 speed measurement test (Graded 9.1/10) How many Warns do you have? (With Screenshot Proof): Currently no warnings (as of application) Why do you want to join the Red Right Hand team: I would like to join Red Right Hand to expand my experience and roleplay. I think a crucial portion of SCP-RP is the “RP” portion, and that’s what many members of groups like Research, RRH Analysts, and other personnel strive for. It’s crucial and essential to effectively know how to conduct different forms of roleplay. I believe, by joining Red Right Hand, I can learn new forms of RP I’m not already oriented with, while also sharing my own abilities of roleplay with current members of Red Right Hand. It could also be a new experience, and a positive one given the right circumstances. To summarize why, I simply wish to join Red Right Hand for a fresh and new experience of roleplay, as well as to expand my abilities and activity. Why should we accept you: I feel I should be accepted due to multiple reasons. The first being my length of time on the server. For example, I remember the time when Alpha-1 was its own Task Force similar to Nu-7 and Epsilon-11. A time when Oaths of Silence were mandated and only the best could stick out from the rest. I believe I should also be accepted due to my experience in various divisions. I’ve been command in Security in the past, I am currently a command member of Research, and I’ve been a member of Epsilon-11 in the past on Site-05. Finally, I believe I should be accepted due to the level of detail I put in reports when available. To me, all words have a meaning, and its commonly made early and explained later. This is shown in my Research documentation that has been made within the past month