Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/15/2020 in all areas

  1. Denied Okay, so this is a very unique situation, and I would like to be as concise while explaining the reason for this denial. This report is a mixed collection of disagreement and some not so respected actions from one of our staff members. That staff, Ryzen, has already resigned from his position and can no longer face any punishments staff wise. To address the two reasons for the report... Racism: A large handful of the global SMT team agrees that the claims of racism do not match with the language ryzen used. It can be more interpreted as a base onto how a certain moment in history began, rather than a targeted attack towards a certain race. Sexual Harassment: SMT on every server treat any sort of sexual harassment claim with extreme caution and careful analytics of the entire situation. We are not condoning the actions of the accused, as they are not permitted here for any staff member to do, but some concerns did arise when the messages show they are from a month prior, which, if the actions of the accused were as urgently concerning as they are made to be in this post, it should have been reported sooner. I did attempt to gain some context of previous actions of the sexual harassment claim, but , it is not fair to push our staff into taking the blame for this not being reported to management (which these should always come to) until now. Once again, we do NOT condone the actions, but the specific parts of this case makes it difficult to punish the player. - PoliceRP SMT
    8 points
  2. @Snarlax Couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you.
    4 points
  3. +Support E11 could really use this really spicy update
    2 points
  4. I have been informed that some of those statements are automatic from the coffee machine SCP. I've never actually seen the coffee machine used, and was not aware of that! I'll take the hit on that and admit my mistake. My apologies there.
    2 points
  5. What are you suggesting? - I wish for this prop to be blacklisted because it is being abused. How would this change better the server? - It will end abuse of the prop, and it will prevent minging with this prop before it even grows into a large issue. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - None. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Everyone. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - (This image above shows me spawning in the prop as a demonstration of how it can and will be abused if you were in an active RP zone.)
    1 point
  6. Lore Name: Dr. Sam Warner Rank: JR SCP: 012 Question / Idea: Are blind individuals effected by SCP-012? Background Research: SCP-012 is a sheet of music that if looked upon by any person will cause them to try and finish this unfinishable piece using their own blood. This usually causes the person to die of blood loss. Hypothesis: SCP-012 will certainly have an effect over the individual. Observations (What Happened During Test): Once the subject entered the test chamber, he immediately began to claw at his own eyes until he began to bleed. He than attempted to "finish" the piece. The subject expired 2 minutes later. Evidence/Visual Stimuli (N/A if unable/none): N/A Analysis / Conclusion (What Could Of Caused The Results): It seems that SCP-12's anomalous attributes are not hindered by individuals suffering from blindness. Instead, the object is triggered by an individuals proximity to it, regardless of a clear line of sight. Was Your Hypothesis Correct?: Yes. As I predicted, the subject was terminated.
    1 point
  7. So I was wondering, does anyone watch gaming light videos on YouTube? If so what channels do you watch? (I am a small youtuber that uploads a few GL videos and notice they are the best on my channel so I think there is an audience here) I personally dont really watch GL videos, although I do make then from time to time
    1 point
  8. LMAO!!! I was on that because that stupid model is 23 mbs. LMAO
    1 point
  9. 1 point
  10. Please provide the name of the members who gave you permission.
    1 point
  11. +/- Support Overall Zoey, you are a great person and I feel you would make a great addition to the staff team; however, as Alex and other members have noted that your activity can be spotty and sometimes inconsistent. Try to work on resolving that issue if possible in the coming weeks and I'll change this to a +Support. Good luck!
    1 point
  12. While I agree Zoey does have flaws I think that you have grown from them and have shown you can be mature and a good player. I would say you do need to work on the issues stated above, but I don't think it would hurt to give Zoey a chance at staff and see how you preform. Overall +support Good luck Zoey
    1 point
  13. This is being locked. You can probably guess why.
    1 point
  14. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CxY17sm5-0mOURDlYYSjjktxYSIR9hJWb-lodWYqwI8/edit?usp=sharing Cite: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-035 http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-106 Took me nearly 2 hours to make, hope you enjoy!
    1 point
  15. Accepted Go into the ban panel (at the top it says ban) sign in, go to your profile, go to your warn and click appeal. Fill the information out and in the description put the link to this in it.
    1 point
  16. This guy is a 10/10 minge.
    1 point
  17. +/- support M8VP. I have known you for a while. I have known that you have been a good player and a person to talk with. I remember the day that i was hanging in the ci teamspeak and hoovy came in on his main and questioned you about that msg. I do understand that you may have changed over the time. But I do not see an idea of a full staff restriction lift as you did esentially threaten the server. Which when hoovy came in (i dont remember if this is true) you said you dont know what he means. Then heh posted chat logs he had. I feel like you should have a 1 month staff restriction to give it 1 more month. But i do agree with a reduction of this restriction. If it gets fully lifted i suggest you stay on watch if you make it back into staff. i'm not saying this on basis of friend/relationship. I'm saying this from standpoint as staff. But personally i do agree with a full lift.
    1 point
  18. +Support for changing NLR from 2 minutes to 3 minutes for Gensec CCs to see if this makes things more balanced. Simple Solution to implement Doesn't change any of the paid options for the CC Gives a needed nerf to the CCs Will make the most people happy as a compromise
    1 point
  19. 1 point
  20. I watch them from time to time, its funny to see all the moments/
    1 point
  21. @Igneous It's time to give up that throne buddy. Your time has come.
    1 point
  22. The only thing more intense than this is RAID SHADOW LEGENDS CHOOSE YOUR HERO'S AND BATTLE IT OUT!
    1 point
  23. 1 point
  24. You were leaving bunks as trainee multiple times as a trainee which you aren't supposed to do. You were running around LCZ and minging as Trainee. And the recording only shows me putting you in bunks not the full story of you running all around LCZ and screaming at me when i put you in bunks. This recording doesn't show the wrong things you did at all. Yes I shouldn't be using my physgun off duty but i think doing that is better then just gunning you down, which is what we usually do.
    1 point
  25. I think you guys are forgetting the fact that there were staff members on duty at the time. Me breaking a rule does not allow someone to break a blatant staff handbook rule. He told me he didnt care and to report him when I said I was recording. Hes a Senior Moderator striving to become a Admin yet he cant follow one of the simplest rules in the staff handbook?
    -1 points
  26. I'm starting a petition to take away @Crabbo hat for you see, it's UN-natural for communist crab dogs to have headwear and so i say, TAKE THE HAT
    -1 points
  27. What are you suggesting? - Researchers to be able to shoot 076-2 if he looks at the said researcher. How would this change better the server? - So researchers can defend themselves since 076-2 kills anyone on sight. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Maybe a bit of confusion if it gets implemented at first. Who would this change mostly benefit? - The researchers. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - why i added this is because he killed me twice while i was trying to go test and i wasnt able to defend myself because of the rules
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...