Jump to content

Garlic

Member
  • Posts

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About Garlic

  • Birthday August 14

Recent Profile Visitors

27,246 profile views

Garlic's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

16

Reputation

  1. I get where you are coming from and I understand that for those who chooses to dedicate themselves to the sever will have no problem understanding the new DEFCON system. However, in my argument, I said that this DEFCON system is not new player friendly and that making them memorize the code may discourage them from playing the server as when comparing them to the old DEFCOn system, it is a universally well-known system used even by the US military (I think).
  2. What are you suggesting? - Reverting back to the old DEFCON system How would this change better the server? - My opinion is rather negative on the new DEFCON system. Granted, the immediate positive trade off is that it gives a more informative description of the situation but that can always be done through chat. However, when analyzing the negative side, I believe that it brings confusion towards new players. Forcing them to remember the code on the server may seem like a hassle and possibly even discourage them from playing the server. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - The disadvantages are subjective but the only negatives in discarding the new DEFCON system is that it sacrifices the description on why we are in this DEFCON. But again, that can always be stated in chat. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Everyone Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A
  3. In Game Name: Garlic Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:228590597 Job applying for (Medical - MEDIC + | Red Right Hand - ANY MTF/CI RANK OR GENSEC COMMAND | Research/RND - Researcher+): Red Right Hand If applying for Red Right Hand preferred O5 to guard: Any O5 that is currently online, I will How many Strikes do you have: 0 Why do you want to join the O5 staff team: I believe that with these recent open spots, my skill in communication, availability, and combat can make a significant contribution towards the Red Right Hand and the safety of the O5s. Another reason in which I am interested in joining the Red Right Hand is the exclusive ability to protect O5 council members. As stated in the lore, O5s are essentially the backbones, masterminds, and leaders running things behind the scene to ensure the safety of the public and the secrecy of the foundation. The astonishing ability to protect the O5s in my opinion makes this an extraordinary position to have. Why should we accept you: I would say that my most outstanding trait a player is my activity on the server. Although I have been inactive lately, I do plan to resume my activity For the past one and a half week, I have been getting on everyday and remained on the server for 12~16 hours straight. In other words, my availability to protect an O5 would be excellent. Of course, other than my activity, I also excel at the art of communication. As my current role as an E11, I get on TeamSpeak daily and communicate to my fellow E11 comrades any SCP breaches, D-class escapees, CI Raid, and Sarkic activity. As I stated in all of my applications before, I put in dedication into the things that choose to do. Evidently, my activity and my achieved rank in the tender timespan of 1 and a half week in E11 can be supported for my claim. Furthermore, my ability to remain professional and calm also qualifies as a viable trait towards my qualification as an RRH and the way that I act towards certain commentary and scenario makes me very easy to work with. Last but not least, my PvP skills. Although adequate, I must remain humble as I surely believe that their are members within the RRH division with more talented combat skill that I do. In conclusion, my skillset to qualify as an Red RIght Hand Member should suffice as I have proven my Combat, Communication, and Availability to be above average. Traits that Garlic excels at: -Activity -Communication -Combat
  4. as for my input, i personally have not had prolonged interaction with you ingame. As other community member are putting a neutral, I will too remain neutral until further one-sided input has been made
  5. Based on the opinion above, that is a +support from me
  6. -/+ Support So as you stated in your reason to appeal your ban, you did kill four or five people, specifically D class. Now I do appreciate you admitting tp killing D class but I did have mutiple interactions with you through sits and you should've known that engaging in wrench fights is a sure way to be brought into a RDM sit. Therefore, I believe it is best to leave this ban period the way it is to serve as a reminder that it is bad to RDM. On the contrary, I would have no objection for the length to be shorten if other member of the community deems that a 4 day ban is unnecessary.
  7. Ah yes. So let me describe my side of the story. So the author of this post made a sit about 939 teaming in which then he provided me with video evidence. After reviewing the evidence, I concluded that it is not teaming. First of all, the video footage starts off by showing 076 and 939 bumping into each other. Their initial reaction was to create distance between each other with showed their acknowledgement of the rule and that they had no means to break it. Furthermore, as the footage progresses, the negev was fired for about a good 20s before the appearance of 939 which eliminates the chance that 939 was waiting in another room for the action to happen. Lastly, the sound being produced by the bullet gave 939 a valid RP reason to kill the MTF as 939 is suppose to attack by sound. In the end, I concluded that this was rather just an unfortunate turn of events for the MTF in which two SCPs of excellent combination just happened to be at the same place. Of course, seeing that he wasn't satisfied with my handling of the sit, I suggested that he could always report him on the forums for the other players to decide if this was FailRP or not. In the end, I will give this a -/+ Support *I do not wish for my opinion to effect the outcome of this post as I am only here to provide my input and opinion of the situation.
  8. That was probably my prop. This post is just to perm-prop that prop so that when i go offline, the prop doesn't disappear
  9. *NOTE: This post is made for forum user: "Mary" as she is unable to post warning appeal because of forum restriction Your In-game Name: Mary Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:519066521 The admin's name in-game: Zeeptin What warning did you receive: Topic Bumping When did you receive this warning: 12/24/2020 Please give a description of the situation that led to the warning: The warning was issued for the reason "topic bumping" Why do you think this warn was false: The message was sent with means to be helpful and possessed no intention to "bump" the topic to the back of the queue Evidence the warning is false:
  10. What are you suggesting? - Few Changes to the MOTD to either make things less confusing for the players or to sync the SOP rules of the branch more. How would this change better the server? - Less confusion Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - no... Who would this change mostly benefit? - E V E R Y O N E !!! Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A 1. In the Mobile Task Force Omnicron-9 section, there is a rule that states this: "Omi-9 personnel are not allowed in D-Block unless it is DEFCON 3 or above, or DEFCON 4 and requested by the highest ranking GENSEC online with the minimum rank of Corporal, or Omi High Command." When stated "unless it is DEFCON 3 or above", does it mean DEFCON 3 or below? 2. Under 096's description it is stated as such: "SCP-096: A keter class SCP. SCP-096 is extremely violent and resembles a slim, humanoid figure. It gets very agitated when someone looks directly at it in close range. Furthermore, it is incredibly fast, making it the perfect killing machine." When stated "A Keter class SCP", does it mean Euclid? 3. In the self breach section for SCP 098 its states "SCP-098's self breaching process can be stopped by providing them 2 Class-D. If no MTF are available to escort Class D to SCP 098’s CC, Gensec/RCF needs to escort the Class D in their place. SCP-098 must advert two warnings over a period of 10 minutes that they require one Class-D." In the first line, it states that the breaching process can be stopped when provided to D class. However, in the third line, it conflicts that by saying that only one D class is needed.
×
×
  • Create New...