Jump to content

ARU Suggestion


Josh aka Spike

Should we bring back ARU?  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we bring back ARU?

    • Yes (ARU ARU ARU)
      20
    • No
      15

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

-Support 

Unpopular opinion but here it goes

  • Would not fit in RP. Rockford is based in Illinois, USA. This was a big reason why it was removed in the first place
  • This was Valk's department. A revival of ARU will likely bring back bad qualities
  •  We already have 4 main tac units including SWAT, CERT, SRT and CAT 
  • SWAT and SRT have already taken over the need for ARU
  • Overall, the server dosnt need ARU. As it stands, adding in a british unit in an american server will throw off RP. As well, there is no need for a 5th tac unit. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Will Newel said:

-Support 

Unpopular opinion but here it goes

  • Would not fit in RP. Rockford is based in Illinois, USA. This was a big reason why it was removed in the first place
  • This was Valk's department. A revival of ARU will likely bring back bad qualities
  •  We already have 4 main tac units including SWAT, CERT, SRT and CAT 
  • SWAT and SRT have already taken over the need for ARU
  • Overall, the server dosnt need ARU. As it stands, adding in a british unit in an american server will throw off RP. As well, there is no need for a 5th tac unit. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARU does not have to associate with Valk, neither ARU is going to be overpowered Jake Croft lol, why do you think every department was nerfed? This is a Semi-Serious RP server, it doesn't need to be all American, it adds varieties for others who are not American

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Strider™ said:

-Support 

No , The branch was stupid it’s basically British police but valk decided to make a Tac team

It is a tac team... (Its basically SWAT for the tea lovers)

  • Like 1

Ex. Superadmin - AnimeRP Ex. Senior Admin (AND FIRST) - PoliceRP   Ex. Senior Moderator - PoliceRP
Ex. Admin - Clonewars Ex. Admin - DarkRP 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArmyGuy said:

ARU does not have to associate with Valk, neither ARU is going to be overpowered Jake Croft lol, why do you think every department was nerfed? This is a Semi-Serious RP server, it doesn't need to be all American, it adds varieties for others who are not American

It won't replace SRT. It's just another additional like SRT was. Same with NSA, BSI and a bunch of other departments. It will help the server and will not associate with Valk in any way. The past is in the past and this is a new future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support 

Reasons why due to the overwhelming +Supports

  • 100% would fit into RP. The fact that it is a British department really does not make a difference, It could easily be called ESU or ARU. Its really up to SMT to decide what role it would have in RP or an entirely made up branch could be made with the exact way to fit into RP as effectively as possible.
  • It doesnt matter if it was Valkyrie running it, he made a branch that was an absolute top notch prestige branch. No other branch on this server demonstrated that LEVEL of quality and prestige.
  •  ARU could essentially replace the dead branches on the server CERT & NSA.
  • Ultimately there is no interaction between SWAT & SRT - No communication and no joint SOP's which really does throw off RP.
  • The TAC units that exists on the server at this point in time do not display the true quality of an effective branch. There is no RP with people running into the bank with no formations and ultimately pure mingery. Quite frankly only SWAT & ARU are the only branches that should exist with joint SOP for specific things that must be taken care of by each department. There is a HUGE lack of RP, it is static and boring. Things need to be changed to revive the aspects of fun but serious RP. 
Edited by Sassi
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Will Newel said:

-Support 

Unpopular opinion but here it goes

  • Would not fit in RP. Rockford is based in Illinois, USA. This was a big reason why it was removed in the first place
  • This was Valk's department. A revival of ARU will likely bring back bad qualities
  •  We already have 4 main tac units including SWAT, CERT, SRT and CAT 
  • SWAT and SRT have already taken over the need for ARU
  • Overall, the server dosnt need ARU. As it stands, adding in a british unit in an american server will throw off RP. As well, there is no need for a 5th tac unit. 

And I like to add. Why you guys really want ARU back so badly. It just like SRT/SWAT/CERT. If you guys have discipline issues with current tacs units then you need to take it up to the chief and see how would he like to the change that particular department. ARU is not needed and this is Valk toys. Don't bring bad image into this server. 

Edited by Kim Yo Suk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kim Yo Suk said:

And I like to add. Why you guys really want ARU back so badly. It just like SRT/SWAT/CERT. If you guys have discipline issues with current tacs units then you need to take it up to the chief and see how would he like to the change that particular department. ARU is not needed and this is Valk toys. Don't bring bad image into this server. 

In the suggestion, we posted why we wanted ARU back. ARU is no way associated with Valkyrie and won’t be. This won’t give the server a bad image, it would attract new players to join because of the variety of departments and it also has and will attract old players as seen in Nolan’s and others replies. 

42 minutes ago, ArmyGuy said:

ARU does not have to associate with Valk, neither ARU is going to be overpowered Jake Croft lol, why do you think every department was nerfed? This is a Semi-Serious RP server, it doesn't need to be all American, it adds varieties for others who are not American

 

Edited by tcoops
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tcoops said:

In the suggestion, we posted why we wanted ARU back. ARU is no way associated with Valkyrie and won’t be. This won’t give the server a bad image, it would attract new players to join because of the variety of departments and it also has and will attract old players as seen in Nolan’s and others replies. 

 

Then this is clear biases against our previous suggestion which is FBI tactical units. Which you guys do not favor it but surprisingly favor to ADD another tactical unit specifically only ARU.

 

Many people have bad history with Valk and ARU is valk's toys. Why you think he loves to add stuff to ARU and overpowered them and top of all off he is the leader of ARU and apparently entire police force on top of that too. This is not just his toys it also represents his pride. Don't spread his pride around and don't bring the negativity into this server. Don't make the bully (Valk) into winner around this server.

 

These old players who are "willing" to come back for just ARU is pure non-sense and contradict what Nolan said the reason he resigned in gaminglight. Very doubtful on all old players.

Edited by Kim Yo Suk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Kim Yo Suk said:

Then this is clear biases against our previous suggestion which is FBI tactical units. Which you guys do not favor it but surprisingly favor to ADD another tactical unit specifically only ARU.

 

Many people have bad history with Valk and ARU is valk's toys. Why you think he loves to add stuff to ARU and overpowered them and top of all off he is the leader of ARU and apparently entire police force on top of that too. This is not just his toys it also represents his pride. Don't spread his pride around and don't bring the negativity into this server. Don't make the bully (Valk) into winner around this server.

 

These old players who are "willing" to come back for just ARU is pure non-sense and contradict what Nolan said the reason he resigned in gaminglight. Very doubtful on all old players.

Nolan came and spoke to us about it when he saw the suggestion. He was for it, not against. Like we hope others will be in the end. Valks toys or not. That is what it was in the past and Valk is no longer here. It’s to add variety, a change and attract players from not only America, but from other places around the world as well.

 

We want the chance to prove to others that because of what happened in the past, it won’t affect how we see it i the future and the present. ARU wont be overpowered, it’ll be fair. Just like the other departments when they got nerfed. If people had bad history with Valk, they can have bad history with Valk. ARU is not Valk. It’s something he ran in the past and to be honest, he did a good job at running the department but just made bad decisions. That’s not what we will do if ARU is brought back.

 

58 minutes ago, ArmyGuy said:

ARU does not have to associate with Valk, neither ARU is going to be overpowered Jake Croft lol, why do you think every department was nerfed? This is a Semi-Serious RP server, it doesn't need to be all American, it adds varieties for others who are not American

 

Edited by tcoops
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, tcoops said:

He came and spoke to us about it when he saw the suggestion. He was for it, not against. Like we hope others will be in the end. Valks toys or not. That is what it was in the past and Valk is no longer here. It’s to add variety, a change and attract players from not only America, but from other places I the country as well.

 

We want the chance to prove to others that because of what happened in the past, it won’t affect how we see it i the future and the present. ARU wont be overpowered, it’ll be fair. Just like the other departments when they got nerfed. If people had bad history with Valk, they can have bad history with Valk. ARU is not Valk. It’s something he ran in the past and to be honest, he did a good job at running the department but just made bad decisions. That’s not what we will do if ARU is brought back.

7

Ok I would like to make myself Korean police department is that something can I have it? Let not stop there. We should also have Australian too. Let add Chinese police department. Top it all off let have Mexican too. Oh, let add Saudi Arabia police forces. Let not forget British aren't only ones here. There are soo many people from different countries. I don't understand why strictly target British only. 

And I say it again. ARU is created by Valk, Valk was leader of ARU and overpowered them the high hell even though people massively complains about how overpowered they are.  Trust me on this, the majority of people hate to see ARU even on the street.

Edited by Kim Yo Suk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Kim Yo Suk said:

Then this is clear biases against our previous suggestion which is FBI tactical units. Which you guys do not favor it but surprisingly favor to ADD another tactical unit specifically only ARU.

 

Many people have bad history with Valk and ARU is valk's toys. Why you think he loves to add stuff to ARU and overpowered them and top of all off he is the leader of ARU and apparently entire police force on top of that too. This is not just his toys it also represents his pride. Don't spread his pride around and don't bring the negativity into this server. Don't make the bully (Valk) into winner around this server.

 

These old players who are "willing" to come back for just ARU is pure non-sense and contradict what Nolan said the reason he resigned in gaminglight. Very doubtful on all old players.

 

35 minutes ago, Kim Yo Suk said:

And I like to add. Why you guys really want ARU back so badly. It just like SRT/SWAT/CERT. If you guys have discipline issues with current tacs units then you need to take it up to the chief and see how would he like to the change that particular department. ARU is not needed and this is Valk toys. Don't bring bad image into this server. 

Ture 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG it's not based off of talk, it wouldn't be "Valk's toys" that is literally the dumbest thing I've heard of, it can be run differently by a different person, can we stop arguing on this, a suggestion is a suggestion state your opinion and then let it go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArmyGuy said:

OMG it's not based off of talk, it wouldn't be "Valk's toys" that is literally the dumbest thing I've heard of, it can be run differently by a different person, can we stop arguing on this, a suggestion is a suggestion state your opinion and then let it go

So who decided to add ARU in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We explained why we wanted to add ARU. Not that the fact that we could have easily requested to add Korean or Jamaican or Australian whilst were at it, but we want the opportunity and chance to create a department that once was a thing. Valkyrie didn’t run the department terribly, he just made bad decisions. 

 

We will keep going back to the point that Valkyrie is NO way associated with ARU. He ran it in the past and now we want to run it in the future. Leave why happened in the past, in the past. 

You say about all those different departments that we could have suggested to add but why was BSI added when there is FBI? Why was SRT added where there was SWAT and ARU? Exactly. All because we wanted to see something different.

 

ARU was not created by Valkyrie. It was ran by Valkyrie in the past and now we want to run it in the future. Give it a chance, see something new. Everyone has their doubts about departments before they get added. Look where BSI, NSA, SRT, CAT and many more ended up.

 

Give it a chance. Maybe you will change you opinion. 

Just now, Kim Yo Suk said:

So who decided to add ARU in the first place?

If you read the suggestion post, it says it under the “Why” question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...